Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:07:57.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Silk Road riches no embarrassment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

N. James
N. James*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The survival of organicmaterials in the waterless fringes of the Takla Makan and Lop Deserts in the Tarim basin in Xinjiang (north-western China) has fascinated us for a century, since Sven Hedin, Aurel Stein and Albert von Le Coq found the remains of settlements and cemeteries at the Great Wall's lonely outposts and along the routes between China and Central Asia known as the Silk Road. The finds date from the Bronze Age to the later firstmillennium AD. In the 1980s and '90s, it was shown that the most striking of them, the Tarim 'mummies', belong to both Mongoloid and Caucasoid peoples (Mallory&Mair 2000). The archaeology here of public and domestic life is full of the kinds of surprises and contradictions that we are learning to expect—if not accept—with 'globalisation'. Development in the region is now prompting new discoveries but also looters, so the research is urgent.

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 85 , Issue 328 , June 2011 , pp. 654 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

James, N. 2008. Repatriation, display and interpretation. Antiquity 82:770–77.10.1017/S0003598X00097386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, V. (ed.) 2010. Secrets of the Silk Road: an exhibition of discoveries from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China. Santa Ana (CA): Bowers Museum.Google Scholar
Mallory, J. P. & Mair, V. 2000. The Tarim mummies: ancient China and the mystery of the earliest peoples from the West. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Pringle, H. 2010. Battle for the Xinjiang mummies. Archaeology 63(4): 30–35.Google Scholar
Sayer, D. 2009. Is there a crisis facing British burial archaeology? Antiquity 83:199–205.10.1017/S0003598X00098203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitch, B. 2008. Courting controversy —the Lindow Man exhibition at the Manchester Museum. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Committee of ICOM for University Museums & Collections, Manchester, 16th–20th September 2008: 51–4. Available at: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/docviews/ (accessed October 2010).Google Scholar
Uzzell, D. & Ballantyne, R. 1998. Heritage that hurts: interpretation in a postmodern world, in Uzzell, D. & Ballantyne, R. (ed.) Contemporary issues in heritage and environmental interpretation: problems and prospects: 152–71. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Wagner, M., Wang, B., Tarasov, P., Westh-Hansen, S. M., Völling, E. & Heller, J. 2009. The ornamental trousers from Sampula (Xinjiang, China): their origins and biography. Antiquity 83:1065–75.10.1017/S0003598X0009935XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieczorek, A. & Lind, C. (ed.). 2007. Ursprünge der Seidenstraße: sensationelle Neufunde aus Xinjiang, China. Stuttgart: Theiss.Google Scholar