Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:16:07.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A revolution in radiocarbon dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The conventional radiocarbon dating method relies on the accurate measurement of a sample's beta-ray decay rate in order to determine the age of the sample. The new method instead counts the individual C14 atoms in a sample using an ultra-sensitive mass spectrometer. There are numerous advantages to this approach. The problem of cosmic ray background does not arise. Shorter counting times on samples a thousand times smaller may be possible. We might also expect the production of more accurate age determinations. The new method will permit a great expansion in the variety of archaeological materials which can be dated because only milligram samples will be required. Research on the design of a dedicated C14 atom-counting machine is now in progress. This note is by E. B. Banning, Department of Near Eastern Studies and Department of Physics Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Toronto, Canada, and L. A. Pavlish, Department of Anthropology and Department of Physics Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Toronto, Canada.

Type
Notes and News
Information
Antiquity , Volume 53 , Issue 209 , November 1979 , pp. 226 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennet, C. L., Beukens, R. P., Clover, M. R., Gove, H. E., Liebert, R. B., Litherland, A. E., Purser, K. H. and Sondheim, W. E.. 1977. Radiocarbon dating using electrostatic accelerators: negative ions provide the key, Science, 198, 508–10.Google Scholar
Bennet, C. L., Beukens, R. P., Clover, M. R., Elmore, D., Gove, H. E., Kilius, L. R., Litherland, A. E., Purser, K. H.. 1978. Radiocarbon dating using electrostatic accelerators: dating of milligram samples, Science, 201, 345–7.Google Scholar
Beukens, R. P. and Pavlish, L. A.. 1978. TL and 14C dating of pottery: archaeometric potential, paper delivered to Canadian Archaeological Association, Quebec, 29 April.Google Scholar
Litherland, A. E. 1978. Radiocarbon dating: recent technological developments. A lecture in the Quaternary Interdisciplinary Seminar Series, University of Toronto, 24 January. Also see (ed.) Gove, H. E., Radiocarbon dating with accelerators (New York, 1978).Google Scholar
Muller, R. A. 1977. Radioisotope dating with a cyclotron, Science, 196, 489–94.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A. Stephenson, E. J., Mast, T. S.. 1978. Radio-isotope dating with an accelerator: a blind measurement, Science, 201, 347–8.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. E. Korteling, R. G. and Stott, W. R.. 1977. Carbon-14: direct detection at natural concentrations, Science, 198, 507–8.Google Scholar
Purser, K. H., Liebert, R. B., Litherland, A. E., Beukens, R. P., Gove, H. E., Bennet, C. L., Clover, M. R. and Sondheim, W. E.. 1977. An attempt to detect stable N- ions from a sputter ion source and some implications of the results for the design of tandems for ultra-sensitive carbon analysis. In proceedings of the Second International Conference on Electrostatic Accelerators, Revue de Physique Appliquée, 12, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, M. 1977. Accelerator technique improves radioisotope dating, Physics Today, 30, No. 12, 17–19.Google Scholar
Tans, P. P., De Jong, A. F. M., Mook, W. G.. 1978. Chemical pre-treatment and radial flow of 14C in tree rings, Nature, 271, 234–5.Google Scholar