Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:40:12.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon dating of the Linear Pottery culture: the contribution of cereal and bone samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Alasdair Whittle
Alasdair Whittle*
Affiliation:
School of History and Archaeology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff CF1 3XU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 64 , Issue 243 , June 1990 , pp. 297 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Radiocarbon dating has not had an easy time with the Linearbandkeramik Kultur, the early Neolithic of the loess plains of central Europe. First-generation radiocarbon dates, establishing a ‘long’ chronology for European prehistory, were unwelcome as making LBK impossibly old. Newer dates, now in general harmony with the rest of Europe, are nevertheless in a less clear order than one would hope.

References

Apsimon, A. 1986. Ballynagilly and the beginning and end of the Irish Neolithic, in Laet, S.J. (ed.), Acculturation and continuity in Atlantic Europe: 15–30. Bruges: de Tempel.Google Scholar
Bogucki, P. 1988. Forest farmers and stockherders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breunig, P. 1985. Bandkeramische Phasen und 14C Datierung. Ein Vergleich, Archädologisches Korrespondenzblatt 15: 139–45.Google Scholar
Breunig, P. 1987. 14-C Chronologie des Vorderasiatischen, Südostund Mitteleuropdischen Neolithikums. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
Cahen, D. & Gilot., E. 1983. Chronologie radiocarbone du Néolithique danubien, in Laet, S.J.de (ed.),Progrés recents dans 1’étude du Néolithiqueancien: 21–40. Bruges: de Tempel.Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Housley, R.A., Law, L.A. & Bronk., C.R. 1989. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 9, Archaeometry 31: 207–34.Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Law, I.A., Bronk, C.R. & Housley., R.A. 1989. The Oxford accelerator mass spectrometer facility: technical developments in routine dating. Archaeometry 31: 99–113.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. & Makkay, J.. 1977. Die Linienbandkeramik in der grossen Ungarischen Tiefebene. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D. 1983. Die ältestlinienbandkeramischen Funde von Eilsleben, Wanzleben, Kr., und der Beginn des Neolithikums im Mittelelbe-Saale-Gebiet, Nachrichten aus Niedersachsens Urgeschichte 52: 177–202.Google Scholar
Kinnes, I. 1988. The cattleship Potemkin: reflections on the first Neolithic in Britain, in Barrett, J. and Kinnes, I. (ed.), The archaeology of context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: recent trends: 2–8. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Kinnes, I. & Thorpe, I.J.. 1986. Radiocarbon dating: use and abuse, Antiquity 60: 221–3.Google Scholar
Kosse, K. 1979. Settlement ecology of the Early and Middle Neolithic Körös and Linear Pottery cultures in Hungary. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series 64.Google Scholar
Lüning, J. 1988. Zur Verbreitung und Datierung Bandkeramischer Erdwerke, Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 18: 155–8.Google Scholar
Lüning, J. & Modderman, P.J.R.. 1982. Hausgrundrisse der ältesten Bandkeramik aus Schwanfeld, Landkreis Schweinfurt, Unterfranken, in Christlein, R. (ed.), Das archäologisches Jahr in Bayern 1981: 66–7. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss.Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J.R. 1970. Linearbandkeramik aus Elsloo und Stein, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 3.Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J.R. 1982. Die Radiokarbon Datierung der Bandkeramik, in Pavúk, J.(ed.).Google Scholar
Pavlů, I. 1981. Altneolithische Häuser in Böhmen, Archeologické rozhledy 33: 534–43.Google Scholar
Pavúk, J. (ed.). 1982. Siedlungen der Kultur mit Linearkeramik in Europa. Nitra: Archaologisches Institut der Slowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Pearson, G.W., Pilcher, J.R., Baillie, M.G.L. Corbett, D.M.C. & Qua, F. 1986. High-precision 14C measurements of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from AD 1840-5210 BC Radiocarbon 28: 911–34.Google Scholar
Quitta, H. 1960. Zur Frage der altesten Bandkeramik in Mitteleuropa, Praehistorische Zeitschrift 38: 1-38, 153–88.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P. 1983. Sedentary hunters: the Erte-bolle example, in Bailey, G. (ed.), Hunter-gatherer economy in prehistory: 111–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarz-Mackensen, G. 1983. Die Siedlung der altesten Linienbandkeramik von Eitzum, Ldkr. Wolfenbuttel, in Wegner, G. (ed.), Friihe Bauernkulturen in Niedersachsen: 23–36. Oldenburg: Veroffentlichungen der urgeschicht-lichen Sammlungen des Landesmuseums zu Hannover 30.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H. 1971. Working with radiocarbon dates, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 37(2): 15–33.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. 1988. Problems in Neolithic archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar