Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:15:05.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Palaeolithic landscape of extraction: flint surface quarries and workshops at Mt Pua, Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ran Barkai
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Avi Gopher
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Philip C. La Porta
Affiliation:
Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Graduate School Center, City University of New York, New York NY 10036, USA. [email protected]

Extract

The authors report on investigations at quarrying sites on Mount Pua, Israel. they suggest that the area shows a degree of industrial organization from the late Lower Palaeolithic with a resultant impact on the landscape.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkai, R. & Gophkk, A. 2001. Lower-Middle Paleolithic flint extraction sites and workshops at Har Pua, Israel. Paper presented at the XIVth International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Liège, Belgium, September 2001.Google Scholar
Bar Yosef, O. & Kuhn, S. 1999. The big deal about blades: laminar technologies and human evolution, American Anthropologist 101: 322–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, B.A.B, Fevrier, S. Blickstein, J.I.B Paddayya, K. Petragija, M. Jhaldiyal, R. & Skinner, R. 2001. ESR dating of an Acheulean quarry site at Isampur, India. Paper presented at the Paleoanthropology Society Meeting, Missouri, USA, March 2001.Google Scholar
Claris, P. & Quartermaine, J. 1989. The Neolithic quarries and axu factory sites of Great Langdale and Scafell Pike: A new field survey, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 55: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debono, H. & Goren-Inbar, N. 2001. Note on a link between Acheulian handaxes and the Levallois method, Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society 31: 923.Google Scholar
Dibrle, H.L. & Bar-Yosef, O. (ed.). The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology. Madison (WI): Prehistory Press. Monograph in World Archaeology 23.Google Scholar
Goren, N. 1979. An Upper Acheulian industry from the Golan Heights, Quartär 29–30: 105–21.Google Scholar
Goren-Inbar, N. 1985. The lithic assemblage of the Berekhat Ram Acheulian site, Paléorient 11: 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, A.E. & Momgal, K. 1995. Modeling the production of elongated blanks from the Early Levantine Mousterian at Rosh Ein Mor, in Dibble, & Bar-Yosef, (ed.): 267–77.Google Scholar
Monnier, G.F. 2000. A re-evaluation of the archaeological evidence for a Lower/Middle Paleolithic division in western Europe. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Ohel, M. 1986. The Acheulian industries of Yiron, Israel. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series S307.Google Scholar
Ohel, M. 1990. Lithic analysis of Acheulian assemblages from the Avivim Sites, Israel Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series S5fi2.Google Scholar
Paddayya, K., Jhaldtyai, R. & Petraglia, M. 2000. Excavation of an Acheulian workshop at Isainpur, Karnataka (India), Antiquity 74: 751–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petraglia, M., La Porta, P. & Paddayya, K. 1999. The first Acheulian quarry in India: stone tool manufacture, biface morphology and behaviors, Journal of Anthropological Besearch 55: 3970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, D. 2000. The British Lower Paleolithic: out of the doldrums, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 66: 397403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolland, N. 1995. Levallois technique emergence: single or multiple? A review of the Euro-African record, in Dibble, & Bar-Yosef, (ed.): 333–59.Google Scholar
Ronen, A., Gilead, I. Bruder, G. & Meller, P. 1974. Notes on the Pleistocene geology and prehistory of the central Dishon Valley, Upper Galilee, Israel, Quartär 25: 1323.Google Scholar
Shimelmitz, R., Barrai, R. & Gopher, A. 2000. Canaanean blade workshop at Mt. Haruvim, Israel, Tel Aviv 27: 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, D. 1998. Raw material as evidence for human behaviour in the Lower Pleistocene: the Olduvai case, in Petraglia, M.D. & Korisettar, R. (ed.), Early human behaviour in global context: the rise & diversity of the Lower Paleolithic Period: 133–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stiles, D., Hay, R. & O’Neil, J. 1974. The MNK chert factory site, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, World Archaeology 5: 285308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuffreau, A. 1995. Variability of Levallois technology in northern France and neighboring areas, in Dibble, & Bar-Yosef, (ed.): 413–27.Google Scholar
Tuffreau, A., Lamotte, A. & Makcy, J.-L. 1997. Land-use and site function in Acheulean complexes of the Somme valley, World Archaeology 29: 225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeersch, P.M., Pauussen, E. & Van Peer, P. 1990. Paleolithic chert exploitation in the limestone stretch of the Egyptian Nile Valley, The African Archaeological Review 8: 77102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeersch, P.M., Pauussen, E. & Van Peer, P. 1995. Paleolithic chert mining in Egypt, Archaeologia Polona 33: 1130.Google Scholar
Vermeersch, P.M., Pauussen, E. & Van Peer, P. 1997. Extensive Middle Paleolithic chert extraction in the Qena area (Egypt), in Schild, R. & Sulgostowska, Z. (ed.), Man and flint (Proceedings of the Vllth International Flint Symposium): 133–42. Warsaw: Institute of Archaeology & Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Vermeersch, P.M., Paulissen, E. Stokes, S. Charlier, C. Van Peer, P. Stringer, C. & Lindsay, W. 1998. Palaeolithic burial of modern human at Taramsa hill, Egypt, Antiquity 72.: 47584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yair, A. 1962. The morphology of Nahal Dishon. MA thesis, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem. (In Hebrew with English summary.)Google Scholar