Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:05:50.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New evidence for the antiquity of the intestinal parasite Trichuris (whipworm) in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

Petra Dark
Petra Dark*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, Whiteknights PO Box 227, Reading RG6 6AB, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The whipworm, Trichuris trichiura L., is one of the most common human intestinal parasites worldwide, yet little is known of its origin and global spread. Archaeological records for this nematode have all been of Neolithic or later date, suggesting a possible association between the spread of pastoral farming and human acquisition of whipworm. This paper reports the discovery of eggs of the genus Trichuris in late Mesolithic deposits from south Wales, indicating that whipworm was present in Europe before the arrival of agriculture. This raises the possibility that human infection by Trichuris arose through contact with wild animals in parts of the landscape frequented by both human and animal groups.

Keywords

Severn EstuaryGoldcliffMesolithicTrichuriswhipwormnematodeendoparasite
Type
Method
Information
Antiquity , Volume 78 , Issue 301 , September 2004 , pp. 676 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J.R.L. 1997. Subfossil mammalian tracks (Flandrian) in the Severn Estuary, S.W. Britain: mechanisms of formation, preservation and distribution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B352: 481–518.Google Scholar
Allen, J.R.L. 2000. Goldcliff Island: geological and sedimentological background, in Bell, Caseldine & Neumann: 12–18.Google Scholar
Aspöck, H., Auer, H. & Picher, O.. 1996. Trichuris trichiura eggs in the Neolithic glacier mummy from the Alps, Parasitology Today 12: 255–6.Google Scholar
Aspöck, H., Auer, H. Picher, O. & Platzer, W.. 2000. Parasitological examination of the Iceman, in Bortenschlager, S. & Oeggle, K. (eds), The Iceman and his Natural Environment. Palaeobotanical Results. The Man in the Ice 4: 127–136. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspöck, H., Barth, F.E. Flamm, H. & Picher, O.. 1974. Parasitäre Erkrankungen des Verdauungstraktes bei prähistorischen Bergleuten von Hallstatt und Hallein (Österreich), Mitt. Anthropol. Ges. Wien 103: 41–7.Google Scholar
Beer, R.J.S. 1976. The relationship between Trichuris trichiura (Linnaeus 1758) of Man and Trichuris suis (Schrank 1788) of the pig, Research in Veterinary Science 20: 47–54.Google Scholar
Bell, M. et al. 2000. The Goldcliff late-Mesolithic site, 5400–4000 Cal Bc, in Bell, , Caseldine & Neumann: 33–63.Google Scholar
Bell, M., Allen, J.R.L. Nayling, N. & Buckley, S. 2002. Mesolithic to Neolithic coastal environmental change c. 6500–3500 cal Bc, Archaeology in the Severn Estuary 12 (for 2001): 27–53.Google Scholar
Bell, M., Allen, J.R.L. Buckley, S. Dark, P. & Haslett, S.K.. 2003. Mesolithic to Neolithic coastal environmental change: excavations at Goldcliff East, 2002, Archaeology in the Severn Estuary 13 (for 2002): 1–29.Google Scholar
Bell, M., Caseldine, A. & Neumann, H.. 2000. Prehistoric Intertidal Archaeology in the Welsh Severn Estuary. York: Cba Research Report 120.Google Scholar
Bouchet, F., PéTrequin, P., Paicheler, J-C. & Dommelier, S.. 1995. Première approche paléoparasitologique du site Néolithique de Chalain (Jura, France), Bull. Soc. Path. Ex. 88: 265–8.Google Scholar
Coard, R. 2000. Large mammal bone assemblages, in Bell, , Caseldine & Neumann: 48–53.Google Scholar
Dark, P. 2003. Preliminary results of pollen and microcharcoal analysis of the sequence from Site D, in Bell, et al.: 20–22.Google Scholar
De Rouffignac, C. 1991. Parasite remains, in A. Vince (ed.) Aspects of Saxo-Norman London: 2. Finds and Environmental Evidence. London: London and Middlesex Archaeological Society Special Paper 12: 386–8.Google Scholar
Ferreira, L.F., De AraúJo, A.J.G. & Confalonieri, U.E.C.. 1980. The finding of eggs and larvae of parasitic helminths in archaeological material from Unai, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 74: 798–800.Google Scholar
Ferreira, L.F., De Araújo, A.J.G. & Confalonieri, U.E.C.. 1983. The finding of helminth eggs in a Brazilian mummy. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 77: 65–7.Google Scholar
Hall, A.R., Jones, A.K.G. & Kenward, H.. 1983. Cereal bran and human faecal remains – some preliminary observations, in Proudfoot, B. (ed.) Site Environment and Economy: 85–104. Oxford: Bar International Series 173.Google Scholar
Helbaek, H. 1958. Grauballemandens Sidste Maltid. Kuml. 1958: 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, P.D. 1985. A review of the evidence of human endoparasitism in the pre-Columbian New World through the study of coprolites. Journal of Archaeological Science 12: 299–310.Google Scholar
Jones, A.K.J. 1983. A coprolite from 6–8 Pavement, in Hall, A.R.K Kenward, H. Williams, D. & Greig, J.R.A. (eds), Environment and Living Conditions at Two Anglo- Scandinavian Sites: 225–9. London: Cba.Google Scholar
Jones, A.K.G. 1985. Trichurid ova in archaeological deposits: their value as indicators of ancient faeces, in Fieller, N.R.J. Gilbertson, D.D. & Ralph, N.G.A. (eds), Palaeobiological Investigations: Research Design, Methods and Interpretation: 105–19. Oxford: Bar S266.Google Scholar
Jones, A.K.G. 1990. Coprolites and faecal concretions, in Bell, M., Brean Down Excavations 1983–1987: 242–5. London: Hbmce.Google Scholar
Jones, A.K.J. 1986. Parasitological investigations on Lindow Man, in Stead, I.M. Bourke, J.B. & Brothwell, D., Lindow Man: the Body in the Bog: 136–9. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Jones, A.K.G. & Hutchinson, A.R. 1991. The parasitological evidence, in McCarthy, M.R., The Structural Sequence and Environmental Remains from Castle Street, Carlisle: Excavations 1981–2: 65–72. Kendal: Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Kliks, M.M. 1990. Helminths as heirlooms and souvenirs: a review of New World Paleoparasitology. Parasitology Today 6: 93–100.Google Scholar
Knights, B.A., Dickson, C.A. Dickson, J.H. & Breeze, D.J.. 1983. Evidence concerning the Roman military diet at Bearsden, Scotland, in the 2nd century Ad. Journal of Archaeological Science 10: 139–52.Google Scholar
Mellars, P. & Dark, P.. 1998. Star Carr in Context. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Moore, P.D., Webb, J.A., & Collinson, M.E.. 1991. Pollen Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pike, A.W. & Biddle, M. 1966. Parasite eggs in medieval Winchester. Antiquity 40: 293–6.Google Scholar
Reinhard, K.J., Hevly, R.H. & Anderson, G.A.. 1987. Helminth remains from prehistoric Indian coprolites on the Colorado Plateau. Journal of Parasitology 73: 630–9.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P.J. Bard, E. Beck, J.W. Burr, G.S. Hughen, K.A. Kromer, B. Mccormac, G. Van Der Plicht, J. & Spurk, M.. 1998. Intca 198 Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 24000–0 cal Bp. Radiocarbon 40: 1041–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E.L. 1955. Parasitic helminths in mediaeval remains. The Veterinary Record 67: 216–8.Google Scholar
Thienpont, D., Rochette, F. & Vanparijs, O.F.J.. 1979. Diagnosing Helminthiasis by Coprological Examination. Beerse (Belgium): Janssen Research Foundation.Google Scholar