Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:34:38.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Look what we've found’ – a case study in public archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Francis Pryor*
Affiliation:
Fenland Archaeological Trust, Flag Fen Excavations, Fourth Drove, Fengate Peterborough PE1 5UR

Extract

Two generations ago, Sir Mortimer Wheeler made himself the master of public relations in archaeology. He found some of the funds for digging Maiden Castle from opening the site to the visitors, who were able to buy souvenirs for a few pennies. After a period when the public have seemed a nuisance on-site, the fashion has come back — with added urgency in Britain where the pipeline of funding from public sources no longer flows so easily and where responding to some apparent public demand is becoming a new essential.

Flag Fen, in the wetland of eastern England, is being seen as a model of the new approach. It is conspicuous in the pages of Visitors welcome, the new English Heritage guide for excavators, which is reviewed warmly from across the Atlantic elsewhere in this issue. Here the Wheeler of the Fens explains what he is doing there and way.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binks, G., Dyke, J. & Dagnall, P. 1988. Visitors welcome: a manual on the presentation and interpretation of archaeological excavations. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Pryor, F.M.M. 1974–84. Excavation at Fengate, Peterborough England, the first-fourth report[s]. Toronto & Northampton.Google Scholar
Pryor, F.M.M., French, C.A.I. & Taylor, M. 1986. Flag Fen, Fengate, Peterborough 1: discovery, reconaissance and initial excavation (1982–85), Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar