Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:57:34.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The King's whetstone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jacqueline Simpson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One question fundamental to the interpretation of the elaborate sceptre found at Sutton Hoo is why whetstone should have been chosen as its material. Too heavy for convenience, yet neither rare nor intrinsically beautiful, why was this substance thought appropriate for such an important item of regalia? The interpretation so far has been that it symbolized the king as war-leader, ‘the forger, giver and master of the swords of his followers’. While this is undoubtedly an attractive and appropriate interpretation, it lacks literary confinnation; I would therefore like to put forward an alternative (or supplementary) hypothesis based on the evidence of certain passages in Old Icelandic writings where whetstones are mentioned in a mythical context, or are described as being used in non-realistic circumstances suggestive of ritual. Despite their late date, Icelandic sources have often cast valuable light on Germanic religion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 53 , Issue 208 , July 1979 , pp. 96 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarne, , , A. , S. Thompson, . 1961. The types of the folktale (Helsinki).Google Scholar
Blinkenberg, C. 1911. The Thunderweapon in religion and folklore (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Bruce-Mitford, R. L. S. 1968. The Sutton Hoo ship-burial: a provisional guide (London, 8th impression).Google Scholar
Davidson, , , H. R. E. 1964. Gods and myths of Northern Europe (London).Google Scholar
1965. Thor’s Hammer, Folklore, xxvi, 1 15.Google Scholar
1967. Pagan Scandinavia (London).Google Scholar
Dumezil, , , G. 1959. Les dieux des Germains (Paris).Google Scholar
Ellis, , , H. R. 1943. The road to Hel (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Finnbogason, , , M. 1952. Edda Snorra Sturlusonar (Reykjavik).Google Scholar
Frazer, , , J. G. 1950. The golden bough (London, abridged ed.).Google Scholar
Fritzner, , , J. 1883-96. Ordbog over det Gamie Norske Sprog (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Gimbutas, , , M. 1963. The Balts (London).Google Scholar
Jónsson, , , G. 1944. (ed.) Gautreks saga, in Fornaldarsdgur Nordurlanda, III, 3–41.Google Scholar
Oakley, , , K. P. 1965 The folklore of fossils, Antiquity, xxxix, 117–25.Google Scholar
1971. The Diopet of Ephesus, Folklore IXXXII, 207–11.Google Scholar
Petersens, , , c. , e. Olsen, . 1919-25. (eds) Knytlinga saga (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Turville-Petre, , , G. 1940.(ed.) Viga~Glàms saga (Oxford).Google Scholar