Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:05:19.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cosmogenic radiation nuclides in archaeology: a response to Phillips et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Robert G. Bednarik*
Affiliation:
AURA, PO Box 216, Caulfield South 3162, Australia

Abstract

Various methods have been employed in the attempt to date rock-art. Here Robert Bednarik offers a critique of the cosmogenic radiation nuclides method, and its application to the Côa petroglyphs.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bednarik, R.G. 1979. The potential of rock patination analysis in Australian archaeology — part 1, The Artefact 4: 1438.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1995a. The age of the Côa valley petroglyphs in Portugal, Rock Art Research 12: 86103.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1995b. Côa valley rock art analytical research program. Report to Portuguese government, 28 June 1995.Google Scholar
Davis, R. Jr & Schaeffer, O.A. 1955. Chlorine-36 in nature, Annals of the New York Academy of Science 62: 10522.Google Scholar
Dorn, R.I. 1996. A change of perception, La Pintura 23(2): 1011.Google Scholar
Dorn, R.I. 1997. Constraining the age of the Côa valley (Portugal) engravings with radiocarbon dating, Antiquity 71: 10515.Google Scholar
Kurz, M.D. 1986. In-situ production of terrestrial cosmogenic helium and some applications to geochronology, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 50: 285562.Google Scholar
Lal, D. 1991. Cosmic ray labelling of erosion surfaces: in situ production rates and erosion models, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 104: 42439.Google Scholar
Phillips, F.M., Flinsch, M., Elmore, D. & Sharma, P. 1997. Maximum ages of the Côa valley (Portugal) engravings measured with Chlorine-36, Antiquity 71: 100104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, F.M., Leavy, B.D., Jannik, N.D., Elmore, D. & Kudik, P.W. 1986. The accumulation of cosmogenic chlorine-36 in rocks: a method for surface exposure dating, Science 231: 413.Google Scholar
Phillips, F.M., Zreda, M.G., Smith, S.S., Elmore, D., Kubik, P.W., Dorn, R.I. & Roddy, D. 1991. Age and geomorphic history of Meteor Crater, Arizona, from cosmogenic 16C1 and rock varnish 14C, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 55: 26958.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.M., Zreda, M.G., Smith, S.S., Elmore, D., Kubik, P.W. & Sharma, P. 1990. A cosmogenic chlorine-36 chronology for glacial deposits at Bloody Canyon, eastern Sierra Nevada, California, Science 248: 152932.Google Scholar
Watchman, A. 1995. Recent petroglyphs, Foz Côa, Portugal, Rock Art Research 12: 1048.Google Scholar
Watchman, A. 1996. A review of the theory and assumptions in the AMS dating of the Foz Côa petroglyphs, Portugal, Rock Art Research 13: 2130.Google Scholar
Zilhäo, J., Aubry, T., Carvalho, A.F., Baptista, A.M., Gomes, M.V. & Meireles, J. 1997. The rock art of the Côa valley (Portugal) and its archaeological context: first results of current research, Journal of European Archaeology 5(1): 749.Google Scholar
Zreda, M.G., Phillips, F.M., Elmore, D., Kubik, P.W., Sharma, P. & Dorn, R.I. 1991. Cosmogenic 36Cl production rates in terrestrial rocks, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 105: 94109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zreda, M.G., Phillips, F.M. & Smith, S.S. 1990. Cosmogenic 36Cl dating of geomorphic surfaces. Hydrology Program Report 90–91, New Mexico Tech.Google Scholar