Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:05:50.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuities and discontinuities: archaeology and ethnoarchaeology in the heart of the Eastern Bororo territory, Mato Grosso, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Irmhild Wüst
Irmhild Wüst*
Affiliation:
Museu Antropológico, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Cx P 131, 74.605-220 Goiânia GO, Brazil. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Bororo and cultural continuity

Cultural continuity and discontinuity is a fascinating issue in archaeological investigation, especially in regions where native populations are still present, as in the case of southeastern Mato Grosso. Since there is no necessary correlation between archaeological cultures and self-conscious ethnic groups (Hodder 1978; 1982; Jones 1997), research in areas where a link between ethnographically andlor ethnohistorically known groups and the archaeological record can be established presents a significant challenge for the study of processes involved in cultural continuities, ruptures, and the maintenance or abandonment of stylistic boundaries. This is especially true in a context of colonial impact on native populations, as in the case of the Bororo society.

Keywords

Central BrazilBororo Indiansceramic traditionsethnoarchaeologycultural change
Type
Special section: Issues in Brazilian archaeology
Information
Antiquity , Volume 72 , Issue 277 , September 1998 , pp. 663 - 675
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albisetti, C. & Venturelli, A.J. 1962,1967. Enciclopédia Bororó I & II. Campo Grande: Museu Regional Dom Bosco.Google Scholar
Baldus, H. 1979. A posição social da mulher entre os Bororó Orientais, in Baldus, H. Ensaios de etnologia Brasileira: 60–91. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional.Google Scholar
Brochado, J.P. 1984. An ecological model of the spread of pottery and agriculture into Eastern South America. Ph.D dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Carneiro, R.L. 1983. The cultivation of manioc among the Kuikuru Indians of the Upper Xingu, in Hames, & Vickers, : 65–111.Google Scholar
Castro, D.E.V. & Cunha, D.M.C. (ed.) 1993. Etnologia e história Indígena: núcleo de história indìgena e do indigenismo. São Paulo: USP-FAPESP.Google Scholar
Cordell, K.S. & Yannie, V.J. 1991. Ethnicity, ethnogenesis, and the individuai: a processual approach toward dialogue, in Preuce, W. (ed.), Processual and postprocessual archaeologies: multiple ways of knowing the past: 96–107. Carbondale (IL): Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University. Occasional Paper 10.Google Scholar
Cunha Da, M.C. (ed.). 1992. História dos índios no Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Crocker, J.C. 1967. The social organization of the Eastern Bororó. Ph.D dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Crocker, J.C. 1969 Reciprocity and hierarchy among the Eastern Bororó, Man 4(1): 44–58.Google Scholar
Deboer, W.R.; Kintig, K. & Rostoker, A.G. 1996. Ceramic se-riation and site reoccupation in lowland South America, Latin American Antiquity 7(3): 263–78.Google Scholar
Dongoske, K.E., Yeatts, M. Anyon, R. & Ferguson, T.J. 1997. Archaeological cultures and cultural affiliation: Hopi and Zuni perspectives in the American Southwest, American Antiquity 62(4): 600–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, S.M. 1992 Space-time of the Bororó of Brazil. Gainsville (FL): University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Fensterseifer, E. & Schmitz, P.I. 1975. Fase Iporá. Uma fase Tupiguarani, Anuário de Divulgação Científica (Universidade Católica de Goiás, Goiânia) 2: 19–70.Google Scholar
González, E.M.R. 1996. A ocupação ceramista pré-colonial do Brasil Central: origens e desenvolvimento. Ph.D dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Gross, O.K. 1979. A new approach to Central Brazilian social organization, in Margoli, M.L. & Carte, W.E. (ed.), Anthropological perspectives: essays in honor of Charles Wagley: 321–342. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, O.K. 1983. Village movement in relation to resources in Amazonia, in Hames, & Vickers, (ed.): 429–49.Google Scholar
Hames, R.B. & Vicker, W.T. (ed.). 1983. Adaptative responses of native Amazonians. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heckenberger, M.J. 1996. War and peace in the shadow of empire: sociopolitical change in the Upper Xingu of southeastern Amazonia, AD 1400–2000. Ph.D dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1978. Simple correlations between material culture and society: a review, in Hodde, I. (ed.), The spatial organization of culture: 3–20. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1979. Economic and social stress and material culture patterning, American Antiquity 44(3): 446–54.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982. Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 1997. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledege.Google Scholar
Koslowski, J. 1895. Três semanas entre os índios Guatò, Revista do Museu de la Piata 6: 221–50.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1973 (1955). Tristes trópicos. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
Maybury-Lewis, D. 1974. Akwë-Shavante society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maybury-Lewis, D. (Ed.). 1979. Dialectical societies: the Gê and Bororó of central Brazil. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meggers, B.J. 1991. Cultural evolution in Amazonia, Anthropological Papers 85: 191–216. Ann Arbor (MI): Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Meggers, B.J. 1995. Archaeological perspectives on the potential of Amazonia for intensive exploitation, in Nishizaw, T. & Uitto, I.J. (ed.), The fragile tropics of Latin America: sustainable management of changing environments: 68–93. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, E.T. et al. 1992. Arqueologia: ambiente — desenvolvimento, arqueologia nos empreendimentos hidrelétricos da Eletronorte, resultados preliminares. Brasília: Centrals Elétricas do Norte do Brasil.Google Scholar
Muccillo, R. & Wüst, I. 1981–2. Aspectos da tecnologia cerâmica Bororó, Arquivos do Museu de História Natural 6–7: 323–8.Google Scholar
Neves, W.A. (org.). 1991. Origens, adaptações e diversidade biológica do homem nativo da Amazónia. Belém: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Coleção Snethlage.Google Scholar
Nimuendajú, C. 1942. The Serente. Washington (DC): Frederick Webb Hodge Anniversary Publication Fund.Google Scholar
Nimuendajú, C. 1946. The eastern Timbira. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 41.Google Scholar
Nimuendajú, C. 1981 (1944). Mapa etnohistórico de Curt Nimuendajú. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Fundação Nacional Pró-Memória.Google Scholar
Ramos, A.R. 1980. Hierarquia e simbiose: relações intertribais no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, A.C. 1994a. Amazonian anthropology: strategy for a new synthesis, in Roosevelt, 1994b: 1–32.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, A.C. (Ed.). 1994b. Amazonian Indians from prehistory to present, anthropological perspectives: 1–32. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Schmitz, P.I. 1987. Prehistoric hunters and gatherers of Brazil, Journal of World Prehistory 1(1): 53–126.Google Scholar
Schmitz, P.I., Wüst Copé, S.M. & Thies, U.E. 1982. Arqueologia do centro-sul de Goiás: uma fronteira de horticultores indígenas no centro do Brasil. São Leopoldo: Instituto Anchietano de Pesquisas. Pesquisas Antropologia 33.Google Scholar
Sempé, M.C. & Cacciano, M.A. 1995. Las culturas agroalfareras del Alto Uruguay (Missiones), Argentina, Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia (Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo) 5: 27–38.Google Scholar
Serpa, P.M.N. 1988. Boé Épa. O cultivo da roça entre os Bororó do Mato Grosso. Master’s dissertation, Departamento de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, R.J. 1993 Radiocarbon calibration program, Rev. 3.0, Radiocarbon 35: 215–30.Google Scholar
Viertler, R.B. 1976. As aldeias Bororó: alguns aspectos de sua organização social. São Paulo: Museu Paulista. Coleção Museu Paulista, Série Etnologia 2.Google Scholar
Viertler, R.B. 1986. A formação da sociedade Bororó: mitologia e considerações etnohistóricas, Revista de Antropologia (Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo) 29: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viertler, R.B. 1987. Mito, rito e condições de sobrevivência entre os índios Bororó do Mato Grosso: esboço para uma abordagem interdisciplinar do fenómeno mítico, Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros (São Paulo) 27: 113–24.Google Scholar
Viertler, R.B. 1989. O estudo antropológico de aldeias indígenas no Brasil: estado atual de uma pesquisa entre os Bororó, Dédalo (Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo) 27: 47–64.Google Scholar
Viertler, R.B. 1990. As duras penas: um histórico das relações entre índios Bororó e ‘civilizados’ no Mato Grosso. São Paulo: FFLCH/USP. Antropologia 16.Google Scholar
Von Den Steinen, K. 1894. Unter den Naturvõlkern Central Brasiliens. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
Whitehead, N.L. 1992. Tribes make states and states make tribes: warfare and the creation of colonial tribes and states in northeastern South America, in Ferguso, R.B. & Whitehea, N.L. (ed.), War in the tribal zone, expanding state and indigenous warfare: 127–50. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Wüst, I. 1983. Aspectos da ocupação pré-colonial em uma área do Mato Grosso de Goiás tentativa de uma análise espacial. Master’s dissertation, Departamento de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Wüst, I. 1990. Continuidade e mudança: para uma interpretação dos grupos pré-coloniais na bacia do rio Vermelho, Mato Grosso. Ph.D dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Wüst, I. 1992. Pre-colonial settlement strategies in Bororó territory, Brazil, in Ortiz-Troncoso, O.R. & va der Hammen, T. (ed.), Archaeology and environment in Latin America: 253–8. Amsterdam: Proceedings of the 46th Congress of Americanists, 1988.Google Scholar
Wüst, I. 1994. The Eastern Bororó from an archaeological perspective, in Roosevelt, 1994b: 315–42.Google Scholar
Wüst, I. & Barreto, C. In press. The ring villages of central Brazil: a challenge for Amazonian archaeology, Latin American Antiquity.Google Scholar
Wüst, I. & Carvalho, H.B. 1996. Novas perspectivas para o estudo dos ceramistas pré-coloniais do centro-oeste brasileiro: a análise espacial do sitio Guará 1 (GO-NI-100), Goiás, Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia (Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo) 6: 47–81.Google Scholar
Wüst, I. & Schmitz, P.I. 1975. A fase Jataí — um estudo preliminar, Anuário de Divulgação Científica (Goiânia: Universidade Católica de Goiás) 2(2): 71–93.Google Scholar
Zerries, O. 1953. The bullroarer among south American Indians, Revista do Museu Paulista (NS) 7: 275–310.Google Scholar