Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:17:22.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Construction of national identity and origins in East Asia: a comparative perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Fumiko Ikawa-Smith
Fumiko Ikawa-Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, McGill University, 855 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T7 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many authors have remarked that archaeology in East Asia is part of the discipline of history (Chang 1981: 148; Ikawa-Smith 1975: 15; Nelson 1995: 218; Olsen 1987: 282–3; Von Falkenhausen 1993). Furthermore, it is more ‘locally focussed’ (Barnes 1993: 40), with most of the practising archaeologists investigating archaeological remains within their own national boundaries. To paraphrase the famous statement by North American archaeologists, ‘American archaeology is anthropology or it is nothing’ (Willey & Phillips 1957: 2), into ‘East Asian archaeology is national history or it is nothing’ would be an overstatement, but it is not too far from the reality. The major goal of archaeology in East Asia is to enhance understanding of a nation's past, by increasing its temporal depth. In other words, construction of national identity is the prime business of archaeology in East Asia.

Keywords

ChinaKoreaJapanViet Namnational identityethnic minoritiescultural heritage management
Type
Special section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 281 , September 1999 , pp. 626 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, G.L. 1990. The origins of bureaucratic archaeology in Japan, Journal of the Hong Kong Archaeological Society 12: 183–96.Google Scholar
Barnes, G.L. 1993. China, Korea and Japan: The rise of civilization in East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boule, M., Breuil, H. Licent, E. & Teilhard de Chardin, P.. 1928. Le paléolithique de la Chine, Archives de l’Institut de Paléontologie Humaine 4: 1–138.Google Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1977. Chinese archaeology since 1949, Journal of Asian Studies 36(4): 623–46.Google Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1981. In search of China’s beginnings: new light on an old civilization. American Scientist 69: 148–60.Google Scholar
Egami, N. 1962. Light on Japanese cultural origins from historic archaeology and legend, in Smith, R.J. & Beardsley, R.K. (ed.), Japanese culture: Its development and characteristics: 11–16. Chicago (IL); Aldine.Google Scholar
Fawcett, C.P. 1990. A study of the socio-political context of Japanese archaeology. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Fawcett, C.P. 1995. Nationalism and postwar Japanese archaeology, in Kohl, & Fawcett, (ed.): 232–46.Google Scholar
Hanihara, K. 1991. Dual structure model for the population history of Japanese, Japan Review 2: 1–33.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1975. The cradle of the Bast. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Ikawa-Smith, F. 1975. Japanese ancestors and Palaeolithic archaeology, Asian Perspectives 18(1): 15–25.Google Scholar
Ikawa-Smith, F. 1990. L’idéologie de l’homogénéité culturelle dans l’archéologie préhistorique japonaise, Anthropologie et société 14(3): 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, Lanpo & Huang, Weiwen. 1985. On the recognition of China’s Palaeolithic cultural traditions, in Wu, Rukang & Olsen, J. W. (ed.). Paleoanthropology and Palaeolithic archaeology in the People’s Republic of China: 259–65. Orlando (FL): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jeong-Hak. 1978. The prehistory of Korea. Honolulu (HI): University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kim, Won-Yong. 1975. The Neolithic culture of Korea, in Pearson, R.J. (ed.), The traditional culture and society of Korea: Prehistory: 61–125. Honolulu (HI): The Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kim, Won-Yong. 1983. Recent archaeological discoveries in the Republic of Korea. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1986. Trends in administrative salvage archaeology, in Pearson, et al. (ed.): 491–6.Google Scholar
Kohl, P.L. & Fawcett, C. (ed.). 1995. Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Movius, H.L. 1949. The lower palaeolithic cultures of southern and eastern Asia, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society n.s. 38(4): 329–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, S.M. 1995. The politics of ethnicity in prehistoric Korea, Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, in Kohl, P.L. & Fawcett, C. (ed.), 218–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, J.W. 1987. The practice of archaeology in China today, Antiquity 61: 282–90.Google Scholar
Pai, Hyung Il. 1994. The politics of Korea’s past: The legacy of Japanese colonial archaeology in the Korean peninsula, East Asian History 7: 25–48.Google Scholar
Pai, Hyung Il. 1999. The colonial origins of Korea’s collected past, in Hyung Il, Pai & Tangherini, T. (ed.), Nationalism and the construction of Korean identity. 13–32. Berkeley (CA): Center for Korean Studies, University of California. Korean Research Monograph 26.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. 1992. The nature of Japanese archaeology, Asian Perspectives 31(2): 115–27.Google Scholar
Pearson, R.J., Barnes, G.L. & Hutterer, K.L. (ed.). 1986. Windows on the Japanese past: Studies in archaeology and prehistory Ann Arbor (MI): Center for Japanese Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M. 1984. Japan, in Cleere, H. (ed.), Approaches to the archaeological heritage; 82–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1984. Alternative archaeologies: nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, Man 19: 355–70.Google Scholar
Tsuboi, K. 1986. Problems concerning the preservation of archaeological sites in Japan, in Pearson, et al. (ed.): 481–90.Google Scholar
Umehara, T. 1981. Wasurerareta Ichi-man-nen (The forgotten 10,000 years), in Tatsusaburo, Hayashiya et al., Nippon bunka no soseiki (The genesis of the Japanese culture): 114–21. Tokyo: Shincho-sha. Shincho Kodai Bijitsu-kan 12.Google Scholar
Utagawa, H. 1989. lomante no kokogaku (The archaeology of lomante), Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Von Falkenhausen, L. 1993. On the historiographical orientation of Chinese archaeology, Antiquity 67: 839–49.Google Scholar
Von Falkenhausen, L. 1995. The regional paradigm in Chinese archaeology, in Kohl, & Fawcett, (ed.): 198–217.Google Scholar
Willey, G.R. & Phillips, P.. 1958. Method and theory in American archaeology. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Xinzhi. 1995. The continuity of human evolution in East Asia, in Brenner, S. & Hanihara, K. (ed.), The origins and past of modern humans as viewed from DNA: 267–82. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.Google Scholar