Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:44:59.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeology in current society. A Central European perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2011

Martin Gojda
Martin Gojda*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of West Bohemia, Sedlackova 15, Plzen 306 14, Czech Republic (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years, Central Europe has experienced an unprecedented acceleration in social development (especially due to the demise of the communist regimes), in streams of thought (for example the post-modern vision of truth and the relativity of scientific knowledge) and, above all, in the availability of new information and communication technologies. Like every discipline, archaeology has been obliged not only to react to the contemporary dynamic but also to adapt to it in a positive — i.e. creative — way. Among the resultant trends to be noted in the Czech Republic are a decreasing interest in a single general theoretical paradigm, coupled with an increasing demand for the conservation and mitigation of sites threatened by development and looting. As a possible consequence of these developments, the past two decades have seen a shift in the agenda of archaeological researchers towards landscape and a realignment of the discipline away from the humanities and towards environmental and geographical considerations.

Type
Research article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 85 , Issue 330 , December 2011 , pp. 1448 - 1453
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, J. 1995. Some challenges in contemporary archaeology (Oxbow lecture 2). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Bene, J. & Pokorný, P. (ed.). 2008. Bioarchaeology. Prague: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Bintliff, J. 2000. Is the past ‘knowable’ or is its study just ‘do-able’. Leiden: University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Bland, R. 2005. A pragmatic approach to the problem of portable antiquities: the experience of England and Wales. Antiquity 79: 440–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, M. 2001. The future of field archaeology, in Kobyliński, Z. (ed.) Quo vadis archaeologia? Whither European archaeology in the 21st century?: 118–32. Warsaw: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences & Foundation Res Publica Multiethnica.Google Scholar
Crutchley, S. & Crow, P.. 2010. The light fantastic: using airborne laser scanning in archaeological survey. Swindon: English Heritage. Available at: http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/light-fantastic/light-fantastic.pdf (accessed 1 March 2011).Google Scholar
Devereux, B.J., Amable, G.S. & Crow, P.. 2008. Visualisation of LiDAR models for archaeological feature detection. Antiquity 72: 470–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doneus, M. & Briese, C.. 2006. Full-waveform, airborne laser scanning as a tool for archaeological reconnaissance, in Campana, S. & Forte, M. (ed.) From space to place. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Remote Sensing in Archaeology, Rome, 4-7 December 2006 (British Archaeological Reports international series 1568): 99–105. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Dreslerová, D. & Pokorný, P.. 2004. Vývoj osídlení a struktury prav?eké krajiny na st?redním Labi. Pokus o p?rímé srovnání archeologické a pyloanalytické. Archeologické rozhledy 56: 739–62.Google Scholar
Dreslerová, D. & Sádlo, J.. 2000. Les jako sou?cást prav?eké kulturní krajiny. Archeologické rozhledy 52: 330–46.Google Scholar
Fairclough, G. 2006. Our place in the landscape? An archaeologist's ideology of landscape perception and management, in Mayer, T. (ed.) Landscape ideologies: 177–97. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Gojda, M. 2004a. Prehistoric Bohemia: landscapes and settlements in the heart of Europe. Landscapes 5(1): 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gojda, M. (ed.) 2004b. Ancient landscape, settlement dynamics and non-destructive archaeology. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Gojda, M. (ed.) 2010. Studies in remote sensing for archaeology. Plzeň: University of West Bohemia.Google Scholar
Kobyliński, Z. (ed.) 2001. Quo vadis archaeologia? Whither European archaeology in the 21st century? Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences & Foundation Res Publica Multiethnica.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuna, M. 2004. Nedestruktivní archeologie: teorie, metody a cile [Non-destructive archaeology: theory, methods and goals]. Praha: Academia (in Czech with English summaries).Google Scholar
Rundkvist, M. 2010. Prospects for Sweden. Antiquity 74: 848–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šmejda, L. 2007. Poznámky k průzkumu lesního prost?redí pomocí detektorů kovů, in Krištuf, P. & Šmejda, L. & Vařeka, P. (ed.) Opomíjená archeologie: 233–45. Plzeň: University of West Bohemia.Google Scholar