Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:11:33.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeology and the Luddites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

D. P. Agrawal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The views of Jacquetta Hawkes give vent to the uncomfortable feelings that many older archaeologists have been harbouring against the ‘intrusion’ of science into their exclusive domain of ‘humanistic’ archaeology. I am not so bothered here about the protests of the ‘passing generation’ which is ‘suffering from universal decay’ (using her own words) as with the problems of the two cultures, the methods and meaning of archaeology, its relation with other sciences and the direction towards which it is heading.

Type
Articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 44 , Issue 174 , June 1970 , pp. 115 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohmers, A. 1963. A Statistical Analysis of Flint Artifacts, in (ed.) Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. S., Science in Archaeology (London) 469–81.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, R. B. 1960. Scientific Explanation (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Cassidy, H. G. 1962. The Problem of Sciences and the Humanities in (ed.) Brode, W. R., Science in Progress, XII series, 93–116.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D. 1963. Foreword to (ed.) Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. S., Science in Archaeology (London), 17–19.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J. 1968. The Proper Study of Mankind, Antiquity, 255–62.Google Scholar
Koestler, A. 1964. The Act of Creation, quoting Max Planck (New York).Google Scholar
Kosambi, D. D. 1966. Scientific Numismatics, Scientific American, vol. 214, 102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, B. B. 1951, Further Copper Hoards from the Gangetic Basin and a Review of the Problems, Ancient India, No. 7, 20.Google Scholar
Lindsay, R. B. 1963. The Role of Science in Civilization (New York).Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1959. Approach to Archaeology (Harmondsworth).Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. 1965. The Two Cultures: And a Second Look (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Vallois, H. V. 1960. Vital Statistics in Prehistoric Population as Determined from Archaeological Data, in (eds.) Heizer, R. F. and Cook, S. F., The Application of Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (Chicago: Viking Fund Publication in Anthropology, no. 28), 186–222.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R. E. M. 1956. Archaeology from the Earth (London).Google Scholar
Wheeler, R. E. M. 1963. Foreword to (ed.) Biek, L., Archaeology and the Microscope (London).Google Scholar
Wheeler, R. E. M. 1966. Civilization of the Indus Valley and Beyond (London).Google Scholar
Wheeler, R. E. M. Wiener, N. 1968. Intellectual Honesty and the Contemporary Scientist, Science Today (Bombay), II, no. 7, 26–30. (Remarks made at MIT in 1963).Google Scholar