Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T04:51:58.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transition to Late Antiquity on the Lower Danube: An Interim Report (1996–8)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Andrew Poulter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A total of 268 sites within a region of c 2,000 square kilometres in northern Bulgaria, extending north from the Stara Planina (Haemus) to the Danube, offers a unique opportunity to study the character and extent of economic and social change which separates the Roman Empire from Late Antiquity. The method involves excavations within the Roman city of Nicopolis, along the course of a remarkable Roman aqueduct, and at the ‘type site’ of Gradishte, a Late Roman and early Byzantine fort where one of the primary goals is to reconstruct its palaeoenvironmental history. This is accompanied by site-specific field survey, using geophysics and intensive surface collection, to date and identify different categories of nucleated settlements. Running concurrently, the collection and dating of pottery samples from other sites should help to establish whether there was continuity or dislocation of settlement on the lower Danube in the period of transition between the second and the sixth centuries AD.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 79 , September 1999 , pp. 145 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bartosiewicz, L, Böttger, B, von Bülow, G, Choyke, A M, Döhle, B, Gomoka-Fuchs, G, Schönert-Geiss, E and Stanchev, D 1995. Studien zur Geschichte des Kastells Iatrus (Forschungsstand 1989), BerlinGoogle Scholar
Baxter, D M 1997. ‘A site report and reconstruction of the western aqueduct of the city of Nicopolis ad I strum in the province of Lower Moesia.’ Unpublished BA dissertation, University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar
Baxter, D M 1998. ‘A comparative study of the archaeological recording and technical analysis of Roman aqueducts.’ Unpublished MA dissertation, University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar
Biernacka-Lubanska, M 1973. Wodociagi rzymskie i wczesnobizantyjskie z obszaru mezji dolnej i polnocnej tracji, WarsawGoogle Scholar
Butcher, K 1995. ‘The Coins’, in Poulter 1995, 269–314Google Scholar
Dinchev, V 1997a. ‘Household substructure of the early-Byzantine fortified settlements on the present Bulgarian territory’, Archaeologia Bulgarica., 1, 47–63Google Scholar
Dinchev, V 1997b. Rimskite Vili ψ dneshnata Bulgarska Teritoriya, SofiaGoogle Scholar
Dremsizova, T S and Antonova, V 1964. ‘Sklad za hrani v Madara’, Arheologiy., 6/4, 30–6Google Scholar
Hodge, A T 1992. Roman Aqueducts and Water Supply, LondonGoogle Scholar
Laronde, A 1985. ‘Apollonia de Cyrénaique et son histoire, neuf ans de recherches de la mission archéologique française en Libye’, L'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-lettres, Comptes rendus, 93–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, P P S and Williams, D F 1986. Amphorae and the Roman Economy, LondonGoogle Scholar
Peleg, Y 1991. ‘Ancient pipelines in Israel’, in Future Currents in Aqueduct Studies (ed Hodge, A T), 129–140, LeedsGoogle Scholar
Popescu, E (ed) 1976. Inscripţile Greceşti şi Latine din Secolele IV-XIII descoperite ín România, BucharestGoogle Scholar
Poulter, A G 1983. ‘Town and country in Moesia Inferior’, in Ancient Bulgaria: Papers presented to the International Symposium on the Ancient History and Archaeology of Bulgaria, University of Nottingham, 1981 (ed Poulter, A G), 74–118, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
Poulter, A G 1992. ‘The use and abuse of urbanism in the Danubian provinces during the Later Roman Empire’, in The City in Late Antiquity (ed Rich, J), 99–135, LondonGoogle Scholar
Poulter, A G 1995. The Roman, Late Roman and Early Byzantine city of Nicopolis ad Istrum: the British excavations 1985–1992, Monogr Soc Promotion Roman Stud, LondonGoogle Scholar
Poulter, A G 1998. ‘Field survey at Louloudies: a new late Roman fortification in Pieria’, Annu Brit Sch Athen., 9, 463–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulter, A G 1999. Nicopolis ad Istrum, a Roman to early Byzantine city: the Pottery and the Glass (with Falkner, R. F. and Shepherd, J. D.), Society of Antiquaries of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
Poulter, A G and Kerslake, I 1997. ‘Vertical photographic site recording: the ‘Holmes Boom’, J. Fid Archaeo., 24/2, 221–32Google Scholar
Shkorpil, K V 1905. ‘Materiali dlya Bolgarskih drevnostei Aboba-Pliska’ (Russian), Izvestiya Rousskago arheologicheskago institouta u Konstantinopol, 10, SofiaGoogle Scholar
Soultov, B 1966. ‘Arheologicheski proouchvaniya v Diskodouratera ot 1958 do 1961 godina’, Izvestiya na narodniya mouzei v Veliko Turnovo 3, 25–44Google Scholar
Stenton, E C and Coulton, J J 1986. ‘Oinoanda: the water supply and aqueduct’, Anatolian Stu., 36, 15–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsonchev, D 1931/1934. ‘Vodoprovodit na Nicopolis ad Istrum’, Godishnik na Plovidvskata Narodna Biblioteka i Mousei., 131–148Google Scholar
Uenze, S 1992. Die spätantiken Befestigungen von Sadovec: Ergebnisse der Deutsch-Bulgarisch-Österreichischen Ausgrabungen 1934–1937, I–II, MunichGoogle Scholar
Velkov, I 1934. ‘Razkopki v Madara (1924–1928)’, Sbornik Madara, Razkopki i Proouchvaniy., 77–137, SofiaGoogle Scholar
von Bülow, G, Schieferdecker, D and Heinrich, H. (eds) 1979. Iatrus-Krivina: Spätantike Befestigung und Frühmittelalterliche Siedlung an der unteren Donau, I:Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1966–1973, BerlinGoogle Scholar
von Bülow, G and Schieferdecker, D (eds) 1991. Iatrus-Krivina: Spätantike Befestigung und Frühmittelalterliche Siedlung an der unteren Donau, IV: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1975–1981, BerlinGoogle Scholar