Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:48:46.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Excavations at Ur, 1923–1924

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2012

Extract

I have already described (Antiquaries Journal, iv, 329–46) the work carried out at Tell el Obeid during the winter of 1923–4 by the Joint Expedition of the British Museum and the Museum of the University of Pennsylvania: here I shall deal with what was really the major operation of the season, the clearing of the Ziggurat at Ur itself. Upon this site from 120 to 200 workmen were employed continuously for four and a half months, first under the supervision of Messrs. Gadd and Fitz-Gerald, later under that of the whole staff. Khalil of Jerablus was native foreman at Ur while the Tell el Obeid excavations were in progress, and after they were shut down Hamoudi took over the head control of the entire gang; Yahia, Hamoudi's son, acted as clerk on the work and is responsible for a great deal of the photographic work. All the plans and drawings are by Mr. F. G. Newton.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 2 note 1 This is no disparagement of the work done by Koldewey, Dombart, and others; but those writers had insufficient data and their restorations therefore were necessarily conjectural.

page 8 note 1 The inscriptions do not help us much. The brick-stamps either give the name of E-temen-ni-gur, which is the Temenos generally (Ur-Nammuand Warad-Sin), or that of E-giš-šir-gal, which is presumably that of the great Nannar-temple complex (Kuri-Galzu, Sin-balaṭsu-iḳbi, Nebuchadrezzar, Nabonidus).

page 11 note 1 To make the following account clear it should be remarked that the lowest or first platform existed only at the SE. end of the ziggurat: the second platform only at the NW. end and along the NE. and SW. sides: consequently the third platform was the first to run all round the building; it never has more than one platform-level below it but is really the third in its relation to the general scheme of the ziggurat.

page 12 note 1 We could prove modern destruction at precisely this point; the wall on the south side of the presumed stairs has lost nine or ten courses of its brickwork in the last few years, as is shown by contrasting its present condition with older photographs. A whole staircase may well have vanished in sixty years.

page 14 note 1 ‘The ascertained colours applied to the stages of the ziggurat at Ur are a welcome contribution to the settling of a much discussed question. While the blue of the topmost shrine is not only attested archaeologically, but confirmed by the inscriptions of Nebuchadrezzar, much doubt has been expressed whether the other parts of the building were also coloured. Victor Place reported that he had found traces of colour upon the ziggurat at Khorsabad, and, in spite of sceptics, it now appears that he was probably quite right. But from the fact that some of the most famous ziggurats (e. g. that of Borsippa) bore names which suggested that they were of seven stories, the theory was developed that the normal type was a building of seven stories, each coloured the hue that was conjectured to symbolize the Sun and Moon, and the five planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, Mercury, Venus) known to the Babylonians. It was even supposed that these colours may have corresponded with those of the seven concentric walls of Ecbatana which according to Hdt. i, 98 were respectively white, black, purple, dark blue, scarlet, silver, and gold. But, even if these colours could be proved to have left traces, or to be identified with the heavenly bodies named, it is quite certain that seven was only one of the numbers of stages which a ziggurat might have, three or four being at least equally common. It is therefore impossible to maintain this theory of the planets, but, as the ziggurat seems to represent an artificial mountain, with the abode of the god upon the (blue) summit of it, there is every reason to see in the arrangement and the colouring of the stages a cosmological significance, even if its precise import is uncertain.’—C. J. Gadd.

page 19 note 1 A number of these, found last year, were illustrated in Ant. Journ., iii, 332.