Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:37:43.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dover rune brooch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Vera I. Evision
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , September 1964 , pp. 242 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 242 note 1 Supervised by the author. The processes of cleaning, preservation and drawing of the objects have been delayed, but when this work is completed it will be possible to publish the report.

page 243 note 1 Stephens, G., Old Northern Runic Monuments, iv (1901), pp. 55–57Google Scholar; Victoria County History, Kent, i, p. 340; Archiv. Stud. neuren Sprachen, clxiv (1933), pp. 250–2; R. Jessup, Anglo-Saxon Jewellery (1950), p. 111, pl. xix, 6.

page 243 note 2 Bruce-Mitford, R. L. S., ‘Late Saxon Disc Brooches’, Dark Age Britain, ed. Harden, D. B., (1956), pp. 193–8Google Scholar, fig. 38, pls. xxviii and xxix A. R. I. Page, ‘The Inscriptions’, in D. M. Wilson, Anglo-Saxon ornamental metalwork, 700–1100 (1964), pp. 88–89, No. 83, fig. 34.

page 243 note 3 Kuhn, H., Die germanischen Bügelfibeln der Völkerwanderungszeit in der Rheinprovinz (1940), p. 198Google Scholar, Taf. 83. 20, 14; cf. also Taf. 82. 18, 13 and 19, 10.

page 243 note 4 Kendrick, T. D., ‘Polychrome Jewellery in Kent’, Antiquity, vii, 429 ff.Google Scholar, pl. 1, 1–3, 8–10.

page 243 note 5 Leeds, E. T., Early Anglo-Saxon Art and Archaeology (1936), p. 117Google Scholar, pl. xxxiii, 1–3.

page 243 note 6 Clarke, R. Rainbird, East Anglia (1960), p. 137Google Scholar, fig. 43; Wrenn, C. L., ‘Saxons and Celts in South-west Britain’, Trans. Hon. Soc. of Cymmrodorion (1959), pp. 40–41Google Scholar; Wrenn, C. L. ‘Magic in an Anglo-Saxon Cemetery’, English and Medieval Studies presented to J. R. R. Tolkien (1962), ed. Davis, N. and Wrenn, C. L., pp. 306–20.Google Scholar

page 243 note 7 The Shell Magazine, Sept. 1962, pp. 266–8; Illustrated London News (1963), no. 6474, vol. ccxliii, pp. 320–1.

page 244 note 1 Brown, G. Baldwin, The Arts in Early England, vol. iv, pl. cxlvi, 4.Google Scholar

page 244 note 2 Cf. quatrefoil cloisons on a fifth-century Frankish buckle found in Kent, T. D. Kendrick, op. cit., fig. 7.

page 244 note 3 Arntz, H. und Zeiss, H., Die einheimischen Runendenkmäler des Festlandes (1939), pp. 120–33Google Scholar, Taf. vi, 7, xxxix, 7.

page 244 note 4 Ibid., pp. 307–19, Taf. xxiii; xli, 26.

page 244 note 5 Ibid., pp. 167–72, Taf. ix; Werner, J., Das alamannische Gräberfeld von Bülach (1953), pp. 10–11Google Scholar, 123, fig. 249, pl. 1, 10, 10 a.

page 244 note 6 Arntz und Zeiss, op. cit., pp. 232–5, Taf. xiv.

page 244 note 7 Ibid., pp. 344–50, Taf. xxviii.

page 244 note 8 Elliott, R. W. V., Runes (1959), p. 79, pl. iii, fig. 7Google Scholar. D. M. Wilson, op. cit., No. 36.

page 244 note 9 Bruce-Dickins, , ‘The Inscriptions upon the Coffin’, The Relics of St. Cuthbert (1956), ed. Battiscombe, C. F., pp. 305–7.Google Scholar

page 245 note 1 Ibid., p. 306.

page 245 note 2 Arntz und Zeiss, op. cit., p. 159.

page 245 note 3 Elliott, op. cit., p. 24.

page 245 note 4 According to my reading, Antiq. Journ. xl (1960), 243–4.

page 245 note 5 Kendrick, op. cit., pl. 1, 9.

page 245 note 6 Cf. Elliott, op. cit., p. 34: ‘We may assume then that the Anglo-Saxon settlers brought with them from the Continent a modified version of the older Germanic fuþark.’

page 245 note 7 Urn No. 60/201, The Shell Magazine, Sept. 1962, pp. 266–7; Illustrated London News (1963), no. 6474, vol. ccxliii, pp. 320–1.