Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:35:03.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Nineteenth-Century Anglo-Saxon Finds from Lincolnshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

David Parsons
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 78 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 79 note 1 See Arch. Journ. ciii (1946), 23Google Scholar; Rahtz, Philip, ‘Caistor, Lincolnshire—1959’, Antiq. Journ. xl (1960), 175–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar, especially p. 182 and fig. 3, p. 184.

page 80 note 1 Arch. Journ. vi (1849), 411Google Scholar. See also the Castle Hill evidence discussed below, although the Anglo-Saxon character of this is not proven.

page 80 note 2 A. Genrich, Formenkreise und Stammesgruppen in Schleswig-Holstein (1954), Tafeln 8F and 25C3.

page 80 note 3 I am grateful to Mrs. S. C. Hawkes, F.S.A., for information about the vessel from Grave 34, which had no datable associations.

page 80 note 4 Meaney, A. L., A Gazetteer of Early Anglo-Saxon Burial Sites (1964), p. 155Google Scholar.

page 80 note 5 Meaney, op. cit., p. 160.

page 80 note 6 Arch. Journ. xiv (1857), 174Google Scholar.

page 80 note 7 Information kindly supplied by C. N. Moore and Paul Everson.

page 81 note 1 See Rahtz, op. cit., p. 187.

page 81 note 2 It should be noted, however, that William Stukeley, who previously recorded the discovery of these inhumations, placed Castle Hill south-west of the church (fig. 2, D) (Itinerarium Curiosum (2nd ed. 1776), p. 102). Mr. J. Richards of Caistor tells me that the name currently applies to the plot south-east of the one marked B on fig. 2 and that the adjacent lane is also called Castle Hill. I am grateful to him and to the Revd. H. Roth well for transmitting this information, and for other help.

page 81 note 3 Arch. Journ. vi (1849), 412Google Scholar.

page 81 note 4 Arch. Journ. xxi (1864), 264–5Google Scholar.

page 81 note 5 Meaney, op. cit., p. 162.