Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:54:42.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Significance of the Londesborough Ring Broch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

David Brown
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , March 1977 , pp. 95 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

46 Antiq. Journ. lv (1975), 384–8Google Scholar.

47 Quoted bySwanton, M. J., Antiq. Journ. xlvii (1967), 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar, from J. R. Mortimer, 40Years Researches in British and Saxon Burial Mounds (1905). P. 353Google Scholar.

48 Myres, J. N. L. and Green, B., The Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries of Caistor-by-Norwich and Mark shall (1973), pp. 100–3Google Scholar.

49 Leeds, E. T. and Riley, M., Oxoniensia, vii (1942), 62–70Google Scholar.

50 Wheatley 27 :Leeds, E. T., Proc. Soc. Ant., ser. 2, xxix (1916)Google Scholar; Chatham 18: Douglas, J., Nenia Britannica (1793)Google Scholar.

51 Long Wittenham III: British Museum; Brighthampton 49: Ashmolean Museum; Alfriston 43: Griffith, A. F. and Salzmann, L. F., Sussex Arch. Coll. lvi (1914), 39–40Google Scholar; Dorchester: Leeds, E. T. and Kirk, J. R., Oxoniensia, xvii/xviii (1952/1930), 68–70Google Scholar; Abingdon 3: Leeds, E. T. and Harden, D. B., An Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Abingdon (1936)Google Scholar; Petersfinger :Leeds, E. T. and Shortt, H. de S., An Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Petersfinger (1953)Google Scholar.

52 Sarre 94:Arch. Cant, vi (1864/1865). 174Google Scholar; Minster Lovel l3: Ashmolean Museum; Abingdon, see note 6; Brighthampton: Ashmolean Museum; Lin ton Heath: Neville, R. C., Arch. Journ. xi (1854), 98–9Google Scholar; Wheatley 27, see note 5; Nassington 13: Leeds, E. T. and Atkinson, R. J. C., Antiq. Journ. xxiv (1944), 124Google Scholar; West Overton: Evison, V. I., Fifth Century Invasions (1965), fig. 21Google Scholar; Orpington 39: Tester, P. J., Arch. Cant, lxxxiii (1968), 143–4Google Scholar; Holywell Row 52: Leth-bridge, T. C., Recent Excavations in Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries (1931)Google Scholar.

53 Fairford:Wylie, W. M., Fairford Graves (1852), pl. vGoogle Scholar; Chessell Down:F.C.H. Hants (1900), p. 389Google Scholar; Bifrons 23: Arch. Cant, x (1876), 308Google Scholar; Chatham: Douglas, J., Nenia Britannica (1793), p. 82Google Scholar, pl. 20, 1.

54 Swanton, M. J., Forks Arch. Journ. xli (1963/1966), fig. 2, 7Google Scholar.

55 Antiq. Journ. lv (1975), 388Google Scholar.

56 Genrich, A., NachricAten aus NiedersacAsens Urgeschichte, xxxviii (1969), 15Google Scholar.

57 Zimmermann, W. H., Neue Ausgrabungen in NiedersacAsen, vii (1972), Taf. 26, 3Google Scholar.

58 Information from Dr. Genrich, July 1976. Dr. Genrich is in favour of interpreting the pair of rings as part of the closing apparatus of the purse. He points out a similar pair of rings in Liebenau Korpergrab 96 (NaNU, xl (1971), 280-7).Google Scholar

59 Pescheck, C., Frankenland, xxiii (1971), 235–7Google Scholar.

60 Behrens, G., Mainzer Zeitschrift, xxxv (1940), 13–14, Abb. 1 and 2, 32Google Scholar.

61 This note is an expansion of some ideas put forward by me in A. C. C. Brodribb, A. R. Hands, and D. R. Walker, Excavations at Shakenoak, vol. iii, Site F (1972), 109. For suggestions as to the meaning of some of the objects in these amulet collections the reader is referred to Audrey Meaney's forthcoming Anglo-Saxon Amulets.