Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:48:38.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SG-APSIC1164: Cost-effectiveness of temporary isolation rooms in acute-care settings in Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2023

Nicholas Graves
Affiliation:
Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
Yiying Cai
Affiliation:
Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
Dale Fisher
Affiliation:
Singapore National University Hospital, Singapore
Martin Kiernan
Affiliation:
University of West London, London, United Kingdom
Brett Mitchell
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle, Australia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Objectives: We estimated the change to health-service costs and health benefits resulting from a decision to adopt temporary isolation rooms, which are effective at isolating the patient within a general ward environment. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the decision to adopt temporary isolation rooms in a Singapore hospital. Methods: Existing data were used to update a model of the impact of adopting temporary isolation rooms on healthcare-associated infections. We predicted the expected change to health service costs and health benefits, measured in life years gained. Uncertainty was addressed using probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and the findings were tested with plausible scenarios to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. Results: We predicted 478 fewer HAIs per 100,000 occupied bed days resulting from a decision to adopt temporary isolation rooms. This decreased would result in cost savings of SGD$329,432 (US $247,302) and 1,754 life years gained. When the effectiveness of the intervention was set at 1% of cases of HAI prevented, the incremental cost per life year saved was SGD$16,519 (US $12,400), indicating that this would be a cost-effective measure in Singapore. Conclusions: We have provided evidence that adoption of a temporary isolation room would be cost-effective for Singapore acute-care hospitals. Using temporary isolation rooms may be a positive decision for other countries in the region with fewer resources for infection prevention and control.

Type
Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Organisms
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America