Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:12:46.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SG-APSIC1136: Multidrug-resistant organisms: Elevating issues identified by antimicrobial stewardship to improve infection control responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2023

Frances Sheehan
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Meru Sheel
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Karina Kennedy
Affiliation:
The Canberra Hospital/Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Kathryn Daveson
Affiliation:
The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Objectives: Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in Escherichia coli bacteremia is on the rise in Australia. Currently, laboratory definitions of multidrug-resistant organisms determine infection control responses. The incidence of particular extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) E. coli phenotype, with nonsusceptibility to both ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, is increasing in the Australian Capital Territory, Australia. The increase was noted primarily through antimicrobial stewardship clinical care rather than standard infection control or microbiology processes. Clinically, patients are left with limited or no oral therapeutic options for treatment. Despite not necessarily meeting the laboratory definition of a multidrug-resistant organism, this phenotype is likely to be just as transmissible as other healthcare-associated pathogens. We sought to determine whether laboratory definitions of multidrug-resistant organisms adequately inform infection control responses. Methods: Using laboratory data from Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Pathology, we identified all ESBL E. coli bloodstream isolate episodes from 2016 to 2020. We then reviewed the antibiotic sensitivities of each isolate to identify isolates with nonsusceptibility to both ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. We then compared these isolates with the multidrug-resistant organism definition used by ACT Pathology. Results: In total, 152 isolates were reviewed. ACT Pathology classified 35 (23.0%) of these isolates as a multidrug-resistant organisms. We identified 80 (52.6%) isolates with nonsusceptibility to both ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Of these 80 isolates, only 24 (30.0%) met the ACT Pathology definition of a multidrug-resistant organism. Conclusions: Multidrug-resistant organism definitions should encompass a broad range of healthcare considerations. When the laboratory defines what is important, it may not include the complete spectrum of clinical care concerns. To help combat the rise of multidrug-resistant organisms, definitions for organisms of resistance and transmissibility significance should be developed in conjunction with microbiology, infection control, and antimicrobial stewardship.

Type
Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Organisms
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America