Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T04:41:45.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistance to Antifungals in Non-albicans Candida Species Isolates in the Southeast Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2024

Priscilla Pineda
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Health
Erin Hitchingham
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Health
Melphine Harriott
Affiliation:
TN Department of Health HAI/AR Program
Cody Rocha
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Health
Cherie Drenzek
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Public Health
Grace Lee
Affiliation:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH - OFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Ashley Marin
Affiliation:
Louisiana Department of Health
Melanie Roderick
Affiliation:
Alabama Department of Public Health
JoAnna Wagner
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Public Health
Carolyn Stover
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Health

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem in Candida spp., leading to treatment challenges and increased morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) fungal priority pathogens list classifies C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis as high priority and leading causes of candidemia with high fluconazole resistance. In the US, these organisms are the most frequently isolated non-albicans Candida species. In 2016, the Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network (ARLN) was created to monitor resistance threats, including in Candida spp. This study describes the proportion of resistance in C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis isolates sent to the Southeast ARLN from 2017 to 2023. Methods: This study evaluated C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis submitted to the Southeast ARLN from Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee from February 2017- September 2023. Species identification was confirmed by Bruker Biotyper matrix assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF). Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) was performed using TREK frozen broth microdilution panels. Minimum inhibitory concentration values from the clinical instrument were used to determine susceptibility based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard interpretations from the 2020 CLSI M60 guidelines. Data were extracted from the laboratory information management system. Analyses were conducted using SAS v9.4. Results: AFST testing was performed on 660 C. glabrata, 500 C. parapsilosis, and 233 C. tropicalis isolates from within the Southeast region. The predominant specimen sources by species were blood 25.30% C. glabrata; other/not specified 27.80% C. parapsilosis; and lower respiratory 36.91% C. tropicalis. Resistance to fluconazole is as follows: C. glabrata, 12.88%; C. parapsilosis, 3.41%; C. tropicalis, 36.64%. Resistance to voriconazole is as follows: C. parapsilosis, 1.00%; C. tropicalis 30.04%. Resistance to at least one echinocandin (Anidulafungin, Capsofungin, Micafungin) is as follows: C. glabrata, 1.67%; C. parapsilosis, 0.60%; C. tropicalis, 0.43%. Overall, there was a decreasing trend in resistance to fluconazole, and voriconazole in all three species between 2017 and 2023. Conclusions: Antifungal resistance in non-albicans Candida species represents an emerging public health threat, however, within the Southeast region, ARLN data has shown a decreasing trend of azole resistance. This may be due in part to changes in reporting requirements and submission criteria from within the region. Nevertheless, C. tropicalis showed high resistance to azoles within the Southeast region. These Candida species should be monitored to inform clinical decision making and identify resistance patterns in other US regions due to their increase in resistance worldwide.

Type
Emerging Pathogens
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America