Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:50:56.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic on mortality associated with healthcare-associated infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2023

Andrew Atkinson
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
Katelin B. Nickel
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
John M. Sahrmann
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
Dustin Stwalley
Affiliation:
Institute for Informatics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
Erik R. Dubberke
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
Kathleen McMullen
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention, Mercy Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
Jonas Marschall
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
Margaret A. Olsen
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
Jennie H. Kwon
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
Jason P. Burnham*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
*
Corresponding author: Jason P. Burnham; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), and mortality.

Design:

Retrospective cohort.

Setting:

Three St. Louis, MO hospitals.

Patients:

Adults admitted ≥48 hours from January 1, 2017 to August 31, 2020.

Methods:

Hospital-acquired infections were defined as those occurring ≥48 hours after admission and were based on positive urine, respiratory, and blood cultures. Poisson interrupted time series compared mortality trajectory before (beginning January 1, 2017) and during the first 6 months of the pandemic. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify risk factors for mortality in patients with an HAI before and during the pandemic. A time-to-event analysis considered time to death and discharge by fitting Cox proportional hazards models.

Results:

Among 6,447 admissions with subsequent HAIs, patients were predominantly White (67.9%), with more females (50.9% vs 46.1%, P = .02), having slightly lower body mass index (28 vs 29, P = .001), and more having private insurance (50.6% vs 45.7%, P = .01) in the pre-pandemic period. In the pre-pandemic era, there were 1,000 (17.6%) patient deaths, whereas there were 160 deaths (21.3%, P = .01) during the pandemic. A total of 53 (42.1%) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients died having an HAI. Age and comorbidities increased the risk of death in patients with COVID-19 and an HAI. During the pandemic, Black patients with an HAI and COVID-19 were more likely to die than White patients with an HAI and COVID-19.

Conclusions:

In three Midwestern hospitals, patients with concurrent HAIs and COVID-19 were more likely to die if they were Black, elderly, and had certain chronic comorbidities.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Introduction

Much has been written about severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its effects on mortality Reference Tian, Jiang and Yao1Reference Potere, Valeriani and Candeloro4 but relatively little on the effect of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) on mortality among patients with SARS-CoV-2. In the initial phase of the pandemic, data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network have demonstrated higher rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and ventilator-associated events (VAEs), compared to both pre-pandemic times and as a function of SARS-CoV-2 caseload, but these studies reported HAI incidence and did not comment on mortality. Reference Weiner-Lastinger, Pattabiraman and Konnor5,Reference Baker, Sands and Huang6

With this gap in understanding, we sought to use pre- and early-pandemic-era data to determine patient-level risk factors for mortality among patients with HAIs including urine, bloodstream, and respiratory infections. We used Fine–Gray competing risk models to investigate the impact of the pandemic on mortality in patients with an HAI in a network of St. Louis hospitals.

Methods

Data sources

This retrospective observational study was approved by the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board with a waiver of informed consent. Patient-level data were obtained for hospitalizations from January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2020 from the BJC HealthCare Clinical Data Repository for the three hospitals in the BJC System that treated the majority of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, including one large quaternary care referral hospital and two community hospitals. The COVID-19 pandemic era defined to be from March 12, 2020 to the end of the study period. A randomly selected single admission was included for those with multiple admissions. All-cause mortality during the hospitalization was defined as the primary end point, with patients censored on September 30, 2020 if they were not discharged by then. Healthcare-associated infections (excluding Clostridioides difficile infection) were defined as those occurring ≥48 hours after admission and were based on positive urine, respiratory, and blood cultures, as defined in previous studies. Reference Kwon, Nickel and Reske7 The HAI date was defined as the first positive culture collection date. Patients could have more than one HAI during an admission, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC’s) repeat infection time frame, that is, a 14-day time frame during which no new infections of the same type are reported. 8

Covariates

Inpatient stays at each facility of ≥48 hours duration were used to define monthly admission counts, total days admitted, and average length of stay (LOS). Demographics collected included sex, race, age, and payer; zip code was used to calculate zip-code level socioeconomic status measures, including the U.S. Census Bureau median household income and the CDC Social Vulnerability Index. Additional data included comorbidities defined using ICD-10-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnosis codes and the Elixhauser classification, Reference Elixhauser, Steiner, Harris and Coffey9,10 body mass index (BMI), procedures/surgeries performed during admission (only those performed prior to an HAI) per ICD-10-PCS codes, admitting service defined as the first non-emergency department service per admission, inpatient medications, and ICU stay. Coronavirus disease 2019 was defined using laboratory results and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes; a medical record review was performed for admissions with a COVID-19 ICD-10-CM diagnosis code without a positive laboratory result to confirm a clinical diagnosis of infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the patients with categorical variables displayed as the number and percentage, and continuous variables as median with interquartile range. Group differences were investigated using the χ2 test (or variants thereof) for categorical and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.

The primary analysis compared the estimates of unadjusted mortality patients with HAIs before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using a χ2 test.

In a further step, a Poisson interrupted times series was used to compare the unadjusted mortality trajectory for those with HAIs before and during the pandemic, using patient LOS as the denominator, and with the associated piece-wise model estimating differences between the two time periods.

The Aalen–Johansen estimator was plotted and group differences evaluated with the Gray’s test. In line with current thinking, Reference Wolkewitz, Lambert and von Cube11 supplementary analyses analyzed time to death and time to discharge within both a Fine–Gray competing risks framework and using cause-specific uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazards (CPH) models for death and discharge separately. Time was measured from admission (“time 0”) to date of death, discharge, or administrative censoring (on 9/30/20). This necessarily introduced immortal time bias within the first 2 days, but this approach was considered more intuitive to understand than implicitly having to adjust for the 2-day time difference in analyses. In addition, we fitted a CPH model to estimate the mortality risk from having a COVID diagnosis, including inverse probability weights (IPWs) to adjust for baseline covariate imbalance between the two periods, using sandwich-type standard errors to account for potential intra-hospital correlation effects. We included all relevant baseline factors in the logistic regression model for the IPWs predicting the pre- (coded 0) and during-pandemic periods (coded 1), truncating at the 95% percentile (refer to the variables in Table S1). The most parsimonious models were determined by forward selection and backward deletion using the Akaike information criterion as the inclusion criterion. The proportional hazards assumption was confirmed both visually by plotting the Schoenfeld residuals and using the Grambsch–Therneau statistic.

Subgroup analyses of Black versus White race provided additional insights regarding potential discrepancies. A post hoc analysis was performed to investigate potential disparities between Black and White patients in more detail. We used 1:1 propensity score matching based on a nearest neighbor algorithm (package MatchIt in R) to identify an equal number of similar Black and White patients in terms of sex, age, BMI, health insurance (private or not), admitting hospital, median household income for the area in which the patient resides, comorbidities, and surgical procedures. We verified the matching process by comparing standardized mean differences and visual inspection of the propensity scores (details in the supplementary material Appendix). Following further stratification by household income (upper 50% quartile, lower 50% quartile), proportional hazards models were fitted and the predicted risk of death for Black and White patients compared during the pandemic.

All analyses were performed in R 3.6.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), with a P-value of less than .05 as statistically significant.

Patient consent statement

This retrospective study was approved by the Washington University in St. Louis Institutional Review Board with a waiver of informed consent.

Results

The final cohort included 6,447 HAI patients ≥18 years of age with admissions ≥48 hours across the three study hospitals from January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2020. Patients were predominantly White (67.9%), female (50.9% vs 46.1%, P = .02), having slightly lower BMI (28 vs 29, P = .001), and more having private insurance (50.6% vs 45.7%, P = .01) in the pre-pandemic compared to the pandemic period (Table 1). Baseline characteristics were broadly comparable between the two periods, but with slightly higher proportions of Black patients hospitalized during the pandemic (27.6% pre vs 34.1% during the pandemic). In the pre-pandemic era, there were 1,000 (17.6%) patient deaths, whereas during the SARS-CoV-2 era, there were 160 deaths (21.3%, P = .01). Among COVID-19 patients who developed an HAI, 53 (42.1%) died during hospitalization.

Table 1. Characteristics of HAI patients, stratified by pre and during pandemic

HAI, hospital-acquired infection; IQR, interquartile range.

a Comparing the pre- and during-pandemic groups.

Figure 1A shows an interrupted time series analysis comparing the trajectory of unadjusted monthly all-cause mortality for patients with an HAI pre-pandemic and during the pandemic. There was a decrease in mortality in the last 2 months of the pandemic period (after an initial increase in the early pandemic), but otherwise mortality was fairly constant. Mortality for those with an HAI increased slightly during the pandemic for COVID-19 patients (Fig. 1B, P-value = .1 for an increase in slope). Cox proportional hazards models comparing all-cause mortality in patients with an HAI prior to and during the pandemic confirmed older age as a risk factor (Table S1). Of note, for those with a COVID diagnosis and an HAI, there was a nonlinear effect in patient age with risk increasing for people of age >65 years (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.3, 4.0], P < .001), and for those with chronic lung disease (aHR 1.9, 95% CI [1.2, 2.2], P < .001) and elevated BMI (aHR 1.6 per 5-point increase, 95% CI [1.4, 1.8], P < .001). Having a COVID diagnosis marginally increased the risk of all-cause death for those with an HAI in inverse probability weighted and adjusted CPH models (aHR 1.7 [1.0, 2.4], P = .08, Table 2)).

Figure 1. Interrupted time series comparing unadjusted monthly all-cause mortality among A. those with an HAI (gray, with point-wise 95% confidence intervals) before the pandemic (linear fit, red dashed) and during the pandemic (linear fit, blue dashed) and B. those with HAI and COVID during the pandemic; time 0 is March 12, 2020; restricted cubic spline smoother with 6 knots indicates the trajectory over the whole period (orange dotted, with 95% confidence interval shaded).

Table 2. Estimated effect of having a COVID diagnosis and an HAI on all-cause mortality from fitted Cox proportional hazards models (N = 6389 patients)

HAI, hospital-acquired infection; HR, hazard ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio.

a Adjusted for sex, age, BMI, race, hospital, and private insurance (yes/no).

Table S3 demonstrates the percentages of HAI by type pre and during the pandemic. The percentage of respiratory HAIs increased during the pandemic but without a concomitant increase in mortality. Having a COVID diagnosis increased mortality rates across all HAIs. Urine HAIs were the most common, followed by respiratory and then blood.

Mortality and race

A subgroup analysis of Black and White patients suggests that prior to the pandemic, patients with an HAI died (and were discharged) at approximately the same rate, regardless of race (Fig. 2 panels A and C, respectively). However, during the pandemic, Black patients with an HAI and COVID were more likely to die than White patients with an HAI and COVID (panels B and D, respectively). Furthermore, the predictive distribution from the Fine–Gray proportional hazards model suggested that this difference was almost exclusively among patients over the age of 65, albeit with only in total 31 deaths (22 Black/9 White) in this subgroup (HR for Black patients 4.9, 95% confidence interval [2.3, 10.5], P < .001, refer to Fig. 3).

Figure 2. Aalen–Johansen estimator for the competing risk of death (with and without COVID), and discharge while having an HAI, stratified by pre and during pandemic, and race.

Figure 3. Estimated predicted risk profiles from the Fine–Gray sub-distribution proportional hazards model for those dying with both an HAI and COVID infection (N = 729 patients), stratified by race and age.

In a further subgroup analysis with patients during the pandemic, selecting matched pairs of Black and White patients based on propensity scores (using the covariates in Table S1) indicated that discrepancies were more pronounced in a subgroup of patients with lower median household income (refer to supplementary material, Figure SG1, and the Appendix). However, given the low number of patients and deaths included in these analyses, especially those with a COVID diagnosis, these results are indicative only.

Discussion

In this study, we show that patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis and an HAI during their hospitalization were marginally more likely to die than patients without COVID-19 and an HAI in the pandemic. One previous study showed an increase in HAIs and mortality during the pandemic, Reference Rosenthal, Myatra and Divatia12 but none have specifically studied the interaction between COVID-19, HAIs, and mortality. In a study on VAEs, pandemic-era patients with VAEs were equally likely to die whether or not they had COVID-19. Reference Weinberger, Rhee and Klompas13 In a small study of ICU patients, HAIs were not associated with an increase in mortality in COVID-19 patients. Reference Ramos, de la Villa and Garcia-Ramos14 There have been a few studies showing an association between COVID, HAIs, and increased risk of death, Reference Vacheron, Lepape and Savey15Reference Bardi, Pintado and Gomez-Rojo17 including one study where this association only held true if the HAI caused septic shock. Reference Grasselli, Scaravilli and Mangioni18

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 affects people of color more than White patients including higher mortality rates. Reference Golestaneh, Neugarten and Fisher19 Though some studies have shown Black patients are not more likely to die after adjusting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities, Reference Yehia, Winegar and Fogel20 we know that Black patients, because of structural racism, are more likely to be poor and have chronic health conditions, which, in effect, means that structural racism has led them to be at higher risk of dying from COVID-19. Our study suggests that Black patients, particularly elderly patients and those with lower household incomes, are more likely to die with COVID-19 and an HAI compared to White patients.

Our study is limited by its regional nature, with all three hospitals located in the St. Louis metropolitan area, which may not be representative of patient populations and risk factors for HAIs and mortality across the state, country, and globe. In addition, as these are observational data, we cannot be certain that the results are a direct result of the pandemic and not some other confounding factor. In particular, the assumption of “no unmeasured confounding” in our weighted analyses was a strong one; the inpatient population was known to be different during the pandemic (e.g. fewer routine surgeries), and the influence of increased general hygiene measures (e.g., masking, cohorting, etc.) cannot be estimated. Our study is limited by the amount of data available, which reduces our statistical power, and may mean that some of the null results we found are due to lack of power rather than lack of true effect. This can be explored further in future studies with larger cohort sizes.

Our study is strengthened by the rigorous analytical method utilized, including Fine–Gray competing risk models, multivariable logistic regression, and interrupted time series.

In conclusion, the patients with HAIs and COVID-19 were more likely to die if they were Black, elderly, and had lower income compared to White patients of a similar age and income bracket.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.409

Acknowledgments

None.

Financial support

This study was funded by CDC grant 75D30120C09598 to JPB. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the CDC. JHK is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (grant 1K23AI137321 to J. H. K.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This work was partially funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation grant number CRSK-3_190977 (PI: AA). AA is also employed at the University Children’s Hospital in Basel, Switzerland.

Competing interests

All authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

*

Jennie H. Kwon and Jason P. Burnham contributed equally to this article.

References

Tian, W, Jiang, W, Yao, J, et al. Predictors of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2020;92:18751883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quah, P, Li, A, Phua, J. Mortality rates of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the emerging literature. Crit Care 2020;24:285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ssentongo, P, Ssentongo, AE, Heilbrunn, ES, Ba, DM, Chinchilli, VM. Association of cardiovascular disease and 10 other pre-existing comorbidities with COVID-19 mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0238215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potere, N, Valeriani, E, Candeloro, M, et al. Acute complications and mortality in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2020;24:389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner-Lastinger, LM, Pattabiraman, V, Konnor, RY, et al. The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections in 2020: a summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;43:114.Google Scholar
Baker, MA, Sands, KE, Huang, SS, et al. The Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis 2021;74:17481754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, JH, Nickel, KB, Reske, KA, et al. Risk factors for hospital-acquired infection during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. J Hosp Infect 2023;133:814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Identifying Healthcare-associated Infections (HAI) for NHSN Surveillance. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed May 2022.Google Scholar
Elixhauser, A, Steiner, C, Harris, DR, Coffey, RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998;36:827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP Elixhauser Comorbidity Software. Rockville, MD: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Accessed December 2020.Google Scholar
Wolkewitz, M, Lambert, J, von Cube, M, et al. Statistical analysis of clinical COVID-19 data: a concise overview of lessons learned, common errors and how to avoid them. Clin Epidemiol 2020;12:925928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, VD, Myatra, SN, Divatia, JV, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on health care-associated infections in intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) findings. Int J Infect Dis 2022;118:8388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberger, J, Rhee, C, Klompas, M. Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of ventilator-associated events during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022;19:8289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramos, R, de la Villa, S, Garcia-Ramos, S, et al. COVID-19 associated infections in the ICU setting: a retrospective analysis in a tertiary-care hospital. Enferm Infect Microbiol Clin 2021; 41:278283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vacheron, CH, Lepape, A, Savey, A, et al. Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia among COVID-19 patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022;206: 161169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damico, V, Murano, L, Margosio, V, et al. Co-infections in critically ill adults with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. An Italian multi-centre prospective study. Minerva Med 2022;114:443453.Google Scholar
Bardi, T, Pintado, V, Gomez-Rojo, M, et al. Nosocomial infections associated to COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: clinical characteristics and outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2021;40:495502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grasselli, G, Scaravilli, V, Mangioni, D, et al. Hospital-acquired infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Chest 2021;160:454465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golestaneh, L, Neugarten, J, Fisher, M, et al. The association of race and COVID-19 mortality. EClinicalMedicine 2020;25:100455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yehia, BR, Winegar, A, Fogel, R, et al. Association of race with mortality among patients hospitalized with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at 92 US hospitals. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2018039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of HAI patients, stratified by pre and during pandemic

Figure 1

Figure 1. Interrupted time series comparing unadjusted monthly all-cause mortality among A. those with an HAI (gray, with point-wise 95% confidence intervals) before the pandemic (linear fit, red dashed) and during the pandemic (linear fit, blue dashed) and B. those with HAI and COVID during the pandemic; time 0 is March 12, 2020; restricted cubic spline smoother with 6 knots indicates the trajectory over the whole period (orange dotted, with 95% confidence interval shaded).

Figure 2

Table 2. Estimated effect of having a COVID diagnosis and an HAI on all-cause mortality from fitted Cox proportional hazards models (N = 6389 patients)

Figure 3

Figure 2. Aalen–Johansen estimator for the competing risk of death (with and without COVID), and discharge while having an HAI, stratified by pre and during pandemic, and race.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Estimated predicted risk profiles from the Fine–Gray sub-distribution proportional hazards model for those dying with both an HAI and COVID infection (N = 729 patients), stratified by race and age.

Supplementary material: File

S2732494X23004096sup001.docx

Atkinson et al. supplementary material

Download S2732494X23004096sup001.docx(File)
File 123.4 KB