Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:04:13.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Did Romans Have an Ethnic Identity?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Erich S. Gruen
Erich S. Gruen*
Affiliation:
The University of California, Berkeley , [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper begins with a stark contrast. Whereas the Athenians took great pride in claiming autochthony, a bloodline unsullied by admixture with barbarians or even other Hellenes, Rome's legendary genealogy unhesitatingly encompassed a host of divergent blends and multiple minglings. Greek forbears from Arcadia, Trojan immigrants who merged with Latins, Sabine and Etruscan kings, the fabled intermarriage of Romans and Sabine women – all indicate a firm belief in ethnic mixture at the origins of the nation. This article asks a pointed question: if Romans were perfectly comfortable with multiple identities in their own makeup, how does one account for the numerous slurs, smears and nasty comments addressed by Roman writers against other races and peoples? It examines a variety of such calumnies and stereotypes and argues that they do not fall into the category of ethnic prejudice. Many of the more (ostensibly) hostile remarks have been taken out of context, misunderstood, more humorous than malicious, and outweighed by a host of admiring comments. The collection of quips, jibes and clichés does not amount to ethnic bigotry. Indeed ethnicity, in terms of genetic characteristics that render non-Romans inferior to Romans, plays little or no role in these assessments. A far better indicator of the Roman outlook is the remarkable practice of extending citizenship to manumitted slaves — almost all of whom (or their ancestors) came from abroad. The Romans’ sense of themselves did not require the establishment of ethnic superiority.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 47: Thematic Issue: Culture, Identity and Politics in the Ancient Mediterranean World , 2013 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See e.g. Hdt. 7.161.3; Eur., Ion 589–592Google Scholar; Aristoph., Wasps 1075–1080Google Scholar; Thuc. 1.2.5,2.36.1; Plato, , Men. 245 C-DGoogle Scholar; Isoc, . Pan. 24Google Scholar. Additional references and discussion in Montanari, E., Il smito dell' autoctonia: linee di una dinamica mitico-politico ateniense (Rome 1981)Google Scholar; Loraux, N., The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City (Cambridge MA 1986) 13–27Google Scholar; Isaac, B., The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity (Princeton 2004) 114-24Google Scholar.

2 Liv. 1.1.9. 1.2.4-5: Latinos utramque gentem appellavit … coalescentium in dies magis duorum populorum.

3 Sail, . Cat. 6.1–2Google Scholar.

4 Varro, De Vita p. R. fr. 5, Rip.

5 See, especially, Dion. Hal. 1.9-13, 1.31,1.89.

6 Dion. Hal. 1.61-62.

7 Ibid. 1.9.4, 1.89.

8 ILS 212, col. I, lines 10-19. Livy has similar origins for the early Roman kings: 1.34.1-6.

9 Tac, . Ann. 11.24Google Scholar. On Tacitus’ alterations of the Claudian speech, see Griffin, M.T., “The Lyons Tablet and Tacitean Hindsight’, CQ 32 (1982) 404-18CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Claudius’ liberality is parodied in [Seneca], Apocolocyntosis, 3.3.

10 Flor. 2.6.1: populus Romanus Etruscos, Latinos Sabinosque sibi miscuerit et unum ex omnibus sanguinem ducat.

11 Cic, . Rep. 3.25Google Scholar; cf. Liv. 1.8.5.

12 Cf. Moatti, C., Raison de Rome (Paris 1997) 263-73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 See Bickerman, E., ‘Origines Gentium’, CP 47 (1952) 65–81Google Scholar. Cf. Gruen, E.S., Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (Princeton 2011) 224-5Google Scholar.

14 See the reconstruction, with extensive bibliography, in Gruen, , Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome (Ithaca 1992) 6–51Google Scholar, and the more recent and fuller treatment by Erskine, A., Troy between Greece and Rome (Oxford 2001) 131–224Google Scholar, with different conclusions.

15 Liv. 1.9-13; see 1.13.4: nec pacem modo sed civitatem unam ex duabus faciunt. Also Cic, . De Rep. 2.13Google Scholar; Dion. Hal. 2.46.1-3; Plut, . Rom. 19–21Google Scholar.

16 Cf. Cornell, T.J., The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (London and New York 1995) 75-7Google Scholar, with further bibliography. See the treatment of the tale and its sources by Miles, G.B., Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome (Ithaca, 1995) 179–219Google Scholar, who focuses, however, upon its relevance for the conceptualisation of Roman marriage.

17 Cic, . Balb. 31Google Scholar.

18 Cf. Dench, E., From Barbarians to New Men: Greek, Roman, and Modern Perceptions of Peoples of the Central Apennines (Oxford 1995) 22-24, 253, 343-4Google Scholar.

19 Cato F2.22 (Beck and Walter): Cato autem et Gellius a Sabo Lacedaemonio trahere eos originem referunt. Porro Lacedaemonios durissimos fuisse omnis lectio docet. Sabinorum etiam mores populum Romanum secutum idem Cato dicit = Serv. on Aen. 8.638. A variant version of Cato's remark appears in Dion. Hal. 2.49.2. See Poucet, J., ‘Les origins mythiques des Sabins’, in Études Étrusco-Italiques (Louvain 1963) 157-69Google Scholar; Letta, C., ‘I mores dei Romani e l'origine dei sabini in Catone’, in Riposati, B., Preistoria, storia e civiltà dei Sabini (Rieti 1985), 29–34Google Scholar; Musti, D., Strabene e la Magna Grecia (Padua 1988) 253-7Google Scholar; Dench, , From Barbarians to New Men (η. 18) 86-7Google Scholar; Farney, G., Ethnie Identity and Aristocratic Competition in Republican Rome (Cambridge 2007) 101Google Scholar.

20 Serv. on Aen. 8.638; cf. Sil. Ital. 8.414-415; Poucet, , ‘Origins mythiques des Sabins’ (n. 19) 203-13Google Scholar.

21 The genealogical connection appears in a wide assemblage of sources: e.g. Polyb. 6.11a.7; Cic, . Rep. 2.34–35Google Scholar; Strabo, 5.2.2; Liv. 1.34; Dion. Hal. 3.46-47.

22 The appearance of Etruscans in Greek myth goes back at least as far as Hesiod, who has the offspring of Odysseus and Circe become rulers over the Tyrrhenians: Hes, . Theog. 1011–1016Google Scholar. Cf. West, M.L., Hesiod's Theogony (Oxford 1966) 435-6Google Scholar. And Etruscan interest in Hellenic mythology was no mere passive receptivity of Greek vases: cf. Spivey, N. and Stoddart, S., Etruscan Italy (London, 1990) 97–106Google Scholar.

23 ILS, 212, col. I, lines 10-19.

24 Serv.on Aen. 1.380, 3.170, 7.205-248. Cf. Farney, , Ethnic Identity (n. 19) 141-4Google Scholar.

25 Cf. Gruen, , Culture and National Identity (n. 14) 6–51Google Scholar; Erskine, , Troy between Greece and Rome (n. 14) 131-56Google Scholar.

26 Gruen, , Culture and National Identity (n. 14) 26-9Google Scholar; Erskine, , Troy between Greece and Rome (n. 14) 143–148Google Scholar.

27 Pictor, F1-2 (Beck and Walter); Diod. Sic. 7.5.4-5; Dion. Hal. 1.74.1; Plut, . Rom. 3.1–3Google Scholar.

28 Serv. on Aen. 1.273.

29 Cato, F1.1.4-15; 2.26 (Beck and Walter); Dion. Hal. 1.11.1,1.13.2.

30 Dion. Hal. 1.10-13, 1.89.1-2. Hall, J.M., ‘Arcades His Oris: Greek Projections on the Italian Ethnoscape?’, in Gruen, (ed.), Cultural Borrowings and Ethnic Appropriations in Antiquity (Stuttgart 2005) 265-71Google Scholar, questions the ascription to fifth century writers.

31 Dion. Hal. 1.31, 1.89.22; Strabo, 5.3.3.

32 Dion. Hal. 1.34.1, 1.41-44.

33 Polyb. in Dion. Hal. 1.32.1.

34 He did, however, read Roman historians on the origins of Rome as well: Dion. Hal. 1.73.1-3.

35 Pictor F2 (Beck and Walter).

36 Cato F1.19 (Beck and Walter): cf.F2.26 (Beck and Walter).

37 Liv. 1.5.1-2, 1.7.3-15.

38 Dion. Hal. 1.49.1-2; Strabo, 13.1.53; cf. Erskine, , Troy between Greece and Rome (n. 14) 119–121Google Scholar.

39 Serv, . on Aen. 3.167, 7.207Google Scholar.

40 See Fabre-Serris, J., Rome, l'Arcadie et la mer des Argonautes (Villeneuve d'Ascq 2008) 13–30Google Scholar.

41 See especially Balsdon, J.P.V.D., Romans and Aliens (London 1979) 30-4, 59–70Google Scholar; Dauge, Y.A., Le Barbare (Brussels 1981) 57–280Google Scholar; Isaac, , The Invention of Racism (n. 1) 381–491.Google Scholar

42 Plaut, . Bach. 742-743, 812–813Google Scholar; Most. 20-24, 64-65, 958-960; Poen. 600-603; Truc. 86-87. Cf. Moore, T.J., The Theater of Plautus (Austin 1998) 50–66Google Scholar.

43 Gell, . NA 13.8.1–5Google Scholar.

44 Cato, in Plin, . NH 29.7.14Google Scholar.

45 Plut, . Cato 12.5Google Scholar; cf. Liv. 8.22.8.

46 Cic. Sest. 141.

47 Cic. De Or. 2.265.

48 Ibid. 1.47, 1.102-103.

49 Cic. Prov. Cons. 10: tradidit in servitutem Iudaeis et Syris, nationibus natis servituti.

50 Cato, F4.9 (Beck and Walter).

51 Liv. 23.5.12: natura et moribus inmitem ferumque.

52 Cic, . Q.Fr. 1.1.27Google Scholar.

53 Cic, . Font. 30,43-44,49Google Scholar.

54 Ibid. 26-27.

55 Cic, . Scaur. 42Google Scholar.

56 Strabo, 7.1.4; Manilius, 1.896-903; Vell. Pat. 2.118: in summa feritate versutissimi natumque mendacio genus.

57 Sen, . De Ira, 2.15Google Scholar.

58 Cic, . Nat. Deor. 1.43Google Scholar; Rep. 3.14; Tusc. Disp. 5.78.

59 Juv, . Sat. 15.1–7Google Scholar.

60 Ibid. 1.26-29.

61 Cic, . Flacc. 67Google Scholar.

62 Seneca, in Augustine, , CD 6.11Google Scholar: sceleratissima gens.

63 Tac, . Hist. 5.3.1,5.5.1-2, 5.5.5, 5.8.2Google Scholar.

64 Seneca, in Augustine, , CD 6.11Google Scholar.

65 Petronius, fr. 37.

66 Martial, 11.94.

67 Juv, . Sat. 14.104Google Scholar.

68 Cic, . Font. 30Google Scholar.

69 Cic. Sull. 17.

70 Cic, . Nat. Disp. 1.43Google Scholar; Tusc. Disp. 5.78.; cf. Cat. 4.5,4.10.

71 See Gruen, ‘Cicero and the Alien’ (forthcoming).

72 For this interpretation of Cato and Hellenism, see Gruen, , Culture and National Identity (n. 14) 52–83Google Scholar.

73 On Punica fides, see Gruen, , Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (n. 13) 115-40Google Scholar.

74 Ibid. 141-58.

75 Cato, Orig. F2.3 (Beck and Walter).

76 Gruen, , Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (n. 13) 159-78Google Scholar.

77 Cic, . Nat. Deor. 1.81–82Google Scholar.

78 Ibid.

79 See Witt, R.E., Isis in the Greco-Roman World (London 1971)Google Scholar; Malaise, M., Les conditions de pénétration et de diffusion des cultes égyptiens découverts en Italie (Leiden 1972)Google Scholar; Takâcz, S., Isis and Sarapis in the Roman World (Leiden 1995)Google Scholar.

80 Juv, . Sat. 15.4–6Google Scholar; Gruen, , Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (n. 13) 110-11Google Scholar.

81 Epictetus, in Arr, . Epict. diss. 1.22.4Google Scholar.

82 Varrò, , in August. De Consensu Evangelistarum, 1.30Google Scholar.

83 Vano, , in August. CD, 4.31Google Scholar.

84 Seneca, , in August. CD, 6.11Google Scholar.

85 Tac, . Hist. 5.2–13Google Scholar.

86 See Gruen, , Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (n. 13) 187-96Google Scholar.

87 Tac, . Hist. 5.4.2, 5.5.4Google Scholar.

88 Ibid. 5.5.1-2.

89 Cicero's claim that Syrians and Jews were ‘bom to be slaves’ (Prov. Cons. 10) refers to their vulnerability in armed might and their proneness to conquest and enslavement. Livy, like Cicero, reckons Asians as fit to be slaves (35.49.8, 36.17.4-50). But the statements are set in the mouths of Roman generals exhorting troops against the enemy, and are not a reflection of Livian views or of considered opinion. The same holds for Livy's assertion that Carthaginians were cruel and ferocious, both by custom and by nature (23.5.2), also uttered by a Roman commander, this time after the battle of Cannae. Velleius’ claim that Germans were liars by birth (2.118.1) comes in the context, unsurprisingly, of their ambush of Varas.

90 SIG 543.

91 Dion. Hal. 1.9.4.

92 Treggiari, S., Roman Freedmen during the Late Republic (Oxford 1969) 11–20Google Scholar; Bradley, K.R., Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire: A Study in Social Control (Brussels 1984) 81–112Google Scholar; Gardner, J., Being a Roman Citizen (London 1993) 7–51Google Scholar; Bradley, , Slavery and Society at Rome (Cambridge 1994) 162-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mouritsen, H., The Freedman in the Roman World (Cambridge 2011) 66–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For skepticism on the frequency of manumission, see Wiedemann, T.E.J., ‘The Regularity of Manumission at Rome’, CQ 35 (1985) 162-75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 Demonstrations: Cic, . Flacc. 67Google Scholar; grain distributions: Philo, , Legatio, 158Google Scholar.

94 Athenaeus, 1.20b-c.

95 Martial, 8.61.5. On foreign groups in Rome generally, see the valuable study of Noy, D., Foreigners at Rome: Citizens and Strangers (London 2000) esp. 205-84Google Scholar.

96 Juv, . Sat. 3.58-60, 68–71Google Scholar.

97 Cic, . Nat. Deor. 2.8Google Scholar.