Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:23:30.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pertinax and Plots in the Historia Augusta: A Dismissal in 170 and Two Conspiracies in 193 CE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2022

Paul Jarvis*
Affiliation:
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen

Abstract

This article examines two attempted senatorial coups against Pertinax during his brief reign in 193 CE. By examining literary and epigraphic evidence related to these coups, I argue that Pertinax's political opponents in 193 should be understood to come from a particular political and dynastic network, and that this network represents the final attempt of the connections of Lucius Verus to compete for the imperial power. Further support for this argument is adduced via an analysis of Pertinax's dismissal from a procuratorial post in 170, where there is circumstantial and prosopographical evidence to suggest opposition deriving from connections of this same network earlier in his career. I conclude by discussing how, through the analysis of these coups and similar incidents, we may gain insights into socio-political conflicts at a crisis point for the imperial aristocracy, and how they illustrate the ongoing importance of Antonine dynastic politics, ever-present but sometimes difficult to see.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Australasian Society for Classical Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdy, R. (2007), ‘Review: Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa. Coins from Roman Sites and Collections of Roman Coins from Romania, Vol. I’, Britannia 38, 383–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alföldy, G. (1974), ‘P. Helvius Pertinax und M. Valerius Maximianus’, Situla 14/15, 199215.Google Scholar
Alföldy, G. (1977), Konsulat und Senatorenstand unter den Antoninen. Bonn.Google Scholar
Alföldy, G. (1979), ‘Zum cursus honorum des Aurelius Tuesianus’, ZPE 34, 247–72.Google Scholar
Banchich, T. (2015), The Lost History of Peter the Patrician. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birley, A. R. (1969), ‘The Coups d'Etat of the Year 193’, BJ 169, 247–80.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. (1987 2), Marcus Aurelius. London.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. (1988 2), Septimius Severus. The African Emperor. London.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. (1997), ‘Marius Maximus, the Consular Biographer’, ANRW 2.34.3, 2678–757.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. (2005 2), The Roman Government of Britain. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birley, A. R. (2012), ‘Cassius Dio and the Historia Augusta’, in van Ackeren, M. (ed.), A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Oxford, 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, D. (1969), ‘The Organization of the Legion: The First Cohort and the Equites Legionis’, JRS 59, 50–5.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. (1979), ‘Notes on the Heirs of Commodus’, AJPh 100, 288306.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. (1980), Fronto and Antonine Rome. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chausson, F. (2007), ‘Variétés généalogiques – IV. Cohésion, collusions, collisions: une autre dynastie Antonine’, in Bonamente, G. and Brandt, H. (eds.), Historiae Augustae Colloquium Bambergense. Bari, 123–63.Google Scholar
Corbier, M. (1982), ‘Les familles clarissimes d'Afrique proconsulaire Ier-IIIe siècles’, Tituli 5, 685754.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2012), ‘Cassius Dio and Caracalla’, CQ 62, 796815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devijver, H. (1974), ‘De leeftijd van Ridderofficieren tijdens het vroeg-Romeinse Keizerrijk’, Handelingen van de Koninklijke Zuidnederlandse Maatschappij voor Taal- en Letter-kunde en Geschiedenis 28, 83146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devijver, H. (1988), ‘Les militiae equestres de P. Helvius Pertinax’, ZPE 75, 207–14.Google Scholar
Dise, R. L. (1997a), ‘Trajan, the Antonines, and the Governor's Staff’, ZPE 116, 273–83.Google Scholar
Dise, R. L. (1997b), ‘Variation in Roman Administrative Practice: The Assignments of Beneficiarii Consularis’, ZPE 116, 284–99.Google Scholar
Dobson, B. (1972), ‘Legionary Centurion or Equestrian Officer? A Comparison of Pay and Prospects’, AncSoc 3, 193207.Google Scholar
Eck, W. and Pangerl, A. (2010), ‘Eine neue Bürgerrechtskonstitution für die Truppen von Pannonia inferior aus dem Jahr 162 mit einem neuen Konsulpaar’, ZPE 173, 223–6.Google Scholar
Fitz, J. (1966), ‘Der markomannisch-quadische Angriff gegen Aquileia und Opitergium’, Historia 15, 336–67.Google Scholar
Frere, S. S. (1980), ‘Hyginus and the First Cohort’, Britannia 11, 5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, M. (2011), ‘Identity Theft: Doubles and Masquerades in Cassius Dio's Contemporary History’, ClAnt 30, 3386.Google Scholar
Hekster, O. (2002), Commodus. An Emperor at the Crossroads. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemelrijk, E. A. (2004), ‘City Patronesses in the Roman Empire’, Historia 53, 209–45.Google Scholar
Hose, M. (2007), ‘Cassius Dio: A Senator and Historian in the Age of Anxiety’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Oxford, Chichester, and Malden, MA, 461–7.Google Scholar
Hunink, V. (1997), Apuleius: Pro Se De Magia (Apologia). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jarvis, P. (2017), ‘M. Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus: Adoption, Marriage, and the Manipulation of Imperial Propinquity’, Chiron 47, 120.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. (2010), ‘Lucian, Fronto and the Absence of Contemporary Historiography under the Antonines’, AJPh 131, 285325.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. (2012), ‘Commemoration of the Antonine Aristocracy in Cassius Dio and the Historia Augusta’, CQ 62, 387414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemezis, A. (2014), Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbe, H.-G. (1962), ‘Der Pertinaxstein aus Brühl’, BJ 162, 407–20.Google Scholar
Kovács, P. (2009), Marcus Aurelius’ Rain Miracle and the Marcomannic Wars. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippold, A. (1980), ‘Pertinax in Rätien?’, ZPE 38, 203–15.Google Scholar
Lippold, A. (1983), ‘Zur Laufbahn des P. Helvius Pertinax’, BHAC 1979–1981, 173–91.Google Scholar
Mayer-Olivé, M. (2008), ‘La vida de Pertinax y el Manuscrito Pal. Lat. 899’, Antiquité Tardive 16, 169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasek, S. (2013), Coniuratio ad principem occidendum faciendumque. Der erfolgreiche Staatsstreich gegen Commodus und die Regentschaft des Helvius Pertinax (192/193 n. Chr.). Munich.Google Scholar
Pflaum, H.-G. (1960–82), Les carrières procuratoriennes équestres sous le Haut-Empire romain. Paris.Google Scholar
Pflaum, H.-G. (1961), ‘Les gendres de Marc-Aurèle’, JS 2841.Google Scholar
Pighi, G. B. (1965), De ludis saecularibus populi Romani Quiritium. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Polley, A. R. (2003), ‘The Date of Herodian's History’, AC 72, 203–8.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S. (2014 2), The Roman Empire at Bay AD 180395. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raepsaet-Charlier, M.-T. (1987), Prosopographie des femmes de l'ordre senatorial (Ier–IIe siècles). Leuven.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, D. (2013), ‘The Sources of the Historia Augusta Re-examined’, Histos 7, 146–80.Google Scholar
Roxan, M. (1972), ‘Epigraphic Notes’, Epigraphische Studien 9, 246–50.Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. (1982), Personal Patronage under the Early Empire. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. (1990), ‘Probleme der Datierung des Costoboceneinfalls im Balkanraum unter Marcus Aurelius’, Historia 39, 493–8.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. (1998), ‘Herodian's Historical Methods and Understanding of History’, ANRW 2.34.4, 2775–836.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E. (1979), ‘Dux, Praepositus’, ZPE 36, 263–78.Google Scholar
Strobel, K. (2010), Kaiser Trajan. Regensburg.Google Scholar
Thomasson, B. E. (1996), Fasti Africani. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Tully, G. D. (2004), ‘Did Centurions Lead Detachments of their Legions in Wartime?AClass 47, 139–50.Google Scholar
Whittaker, C. R. (1964), ‘The Revolt of Papirius Dionysius in A.D. 190’, Historia 13, 348–69.Google Scholar
Winterling, A. (2009), Politics and Society in Imperial Rome. London.Google Scholar