Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T01:54:37.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensitivity analysis identifies high influence sites for estimates of penguin krill consumption on the Antarctic Peninsula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2012

Heather J. Lynch ,
Norman Ratcliffe ,
Jennifer Passmore ,
Emma Foster  and
Philip N. Trathan
Heather J. Lynch*
Affiliation:
Ecology & Evolution Department, 640 Life Sciences Building, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Norman Ratcliffe
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Jennifer Passmore
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Emma Foster
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Philip N. Trathan
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Krill consumption by natural predators represents a critical link between surveys and models of standing krill biomass and the design of a sustainable krill fishery for the Scotia Sea. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) is a significant component of diet for penguins breeding in this region and, consequently, uncertainties regarding penguin population abundances contribute to uncertainties in krill predation estimates. We use a comprehensive database of Antarctic penguin abundances to identify 14 breeding colonies that contribute most significantly to uncertainty regarding the total number of pygoscelid penguins breeding in this region. We find that a high quality survey of Zavodovski Island alone would decrease uncertainty in total population by 24.8%, whereas high quality surveys of all 14 “high-influence” locations would decrease uncertainty by almost 72%. Updated population estimates at these sites should be considered top priority for future fieldwork in the region. Our results are based on a robust quantitative method for assessing data priorities in estimating krill consumption that is easily extended to other groups of krill predators.

Keywords

Adélie penguinCCAMLRchinstrap penguinkrill managementpenguin population estimatesZavodovski Island
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 19 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, M.B.Forsythe, A.B. 1974. Robust tests for the equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 364–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlini, A.R., Coria, N.R., Santos, M.M., Negrete, J., Juares, M.A.Daneri, G.A. 2009. Responses of Pygoscelis adeliae and P. papua populations to environmental changes at Isla 25 de Mayo (King George Island). Polar Biology, 32, 1427–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. 1994. The Earth is round (p < 0.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P., Morton, A.Poncet, J. 1999. Survey of marine birds and mammals of the South Sandwich Islands. Polar Record, 35, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croxall, J.P.Kirkwood, E.D. 1979. The distribution of penguins on the Antarctic Peninsula and islands of the Scotia Sea. Cambridge: British Antarctic Survey, 186 pp.Google Scholar
Fox, J.Weisberg, S. 2011. An R companion to applied regression, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 472 pp.Google Scholar
Fraser, W.R.Patterson, D.L. 1997. Human disturbance and long-term changes in Adélie penguin populations: a natural experiment at Palmer Station, Antarctic Peninsula. In Battaglia, B., Valencia, J.&Walton, D.W.H., eds. Antarctic communities: species, structure, and survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 445–452.Google Scholar
Fretwell, P.T.Trathan, P.N. 2009. Penguins from space: faecal stains reveal the location of emperor penguin colonies. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 18, 543–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretwell, P.T., LaRue, M.A., Morin, P., Kooyman, G.L., Wienecke, B., Ratcliffe, N., Fox, A.J., Fleming, A.H., Porter, C.Trathan, P.N. 2012. An emperor penguin population estimate: the first global, synoptic survey of a species from space. PLoS ONE, 7, e33751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, H.J., Naveen, R.Fagan, W.F. 2008. Censuses of penguin, blue-eyed shag Phalacrocorax atriceps and southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus populations on the Antarctic Peninsula, 2001–2007. Marine Ornithology, 36, 83–97.Google Scholar
Lynch, H.J., Naveen, R., Trathan, P.N.Fagan, W.F. 2012a. Spatially integrated assessment reveals widespread changes in penguin populations on the Antarctic Peninsula. Ecology, 93, 1367–1377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, H.J., White, R., Black, A.D.Naveen, R. 2012b. Detection, differentiation, and abundance estimation of penguin species by high-resolution satellite imagery. Polar Biology, 35, 963–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveen, R.Lynch, H.J. 2011. Antarctic Peninsula compendium, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency, 374 pp.Google Scholar
Naveen, R., Forrest, S.C., Dagit, R.G., Blight, L.K., Trivelpiece, W.Z.Trivelpiece, S.G. 2000. Censuses of penguin, blue-eyed shag, and southern giant petrel populations in the Antarctic Peninsula region, 1994–2000. Polar Record, 36, 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poncet, S.Poncet, J. 1987. Censuses of penguin populations of the Antarctic Peninsula, 1983–87. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 77, 109–129.Google Scholar
Southwell, C., Forcada, J., Goebel, M., Hinke, J., Lynch, H., Lyver, P., McKinlay, J., Ratcliffe, N., Ramm, D., Reid, K., Reiss, C., Trivelpiece, W., Trivelpiece, S.Trathan, P. 2009. Update on progress in inter-sessional work from the Predator Survey workshop. Document WG-EMM-09/39. Hobart, TAS: CCAMLR, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Trathan, P.N., Ratcliffe, N.Masden, E.A. 2012. Ecological drivers of change at South Georgia: the krill surplus, or climate variability. Ecography, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07330.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trathan, P.N., Forcada, J., Atkinson, R., Downie, R.H.Shears, J.R. 2008. Population assessments of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) breeding at an important Antarctic tourist site, Goudier Island, Port Lockroy, Palmer Archipelago, Antarctica. Biological Conservation, 141, 3019–3028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woehler, E.J. 1993. The distribution and abundance of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic penguins. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, 76 pp.Google Scholar