Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:45:39.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A mathematical model for variation in water-retention curves among sandy soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

H.W. Hunt ,
A.M. Treonis ,
D.H. Wall  and
R.A. Virginia
H.W. Hunt*
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
A.M. Treonis
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, USA
D.H. Wall
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory and Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
R.A. Virginia
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
*
*[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Equations were developed to predict soil matric potential as a function of soil water content, texture and bulk density in sandy soils. The equations were based on the additivity hypothesis - that water-retention of a whole soil depends on the proportions of several particle size fractions, each with fixed water-retention characteristics. The new model is an advancement over previously published models in that it embodies three basic properties of water-retention curves: a) matric potential is zero at saturation water content, b) matric potential approaches -∞ as water content approaches zero, and c) volumetric water content in dry soil is proportional to bulk density. Values of model parameters were taken from the literature, or estimated by fitting model predictions to data for sandy soils with low organic matter content. Most of the variation in water-release curves in the calibration data was explained by texture, with negligible effects of bulk density and sand particle size. The model predicted that variation in clay content among soils within the sand and loamy sand textural classes had substantial effects on water-retention curves. An understanding of how variation in texture among sandy soils contributes to matric potential is necessary for interpreting biological activity in arid environments.

Keywords

Antarctic soilsbiological activitybulk densitysoil texturesoil matric potentialsoil waterwater-release curve
Type
BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 427 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooks, R.H. & Corey, A.T. 1964. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology Paper No. 3. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, 27 pp.Google Scholar
Buchan, G.D. 1991. Soil temperature regime. In Smith, K.A. & Mullins, C.E., eds. Soil analysis physical methods. Basel: Marcel Dekker, 551–612.Google Scholar
Cameron, R.E. & Conrow, H.P. 1969. Soil moisture, relative humidity, and microbial abundance in Dry Valleys of southern Victoria Land. Antarctic Journal of the United States, 4(1), 23–28.Google Scholar
Campbell, G.S. 1985. Soil physics with BASIC. Oxford: Elsevier, 150 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, I.B. 2003. Soil characteristics at a long-term ecological research site in Taylor Valley, Antarctica. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 41, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, I.B. & Claridge, G.G.C. 1987. Antarctica: soils, weathering processes and environment. New York: Elsevier, 367 pp.Google Scholar
Clapp, R.B. & Hornberger, G.M. 1978. Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research, 14, 601–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, G.G.C. 1965. The clay mineralogy and chemistry of some soils from the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 8, 186–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, G.G.C. & Campbell, I.B. 1968. Soils of the Shackleton Glacier region, Queen Maud Range, Antarctica. New Zealand Journal of Science, 11, 171–218.Google Scholar
Coleman, D.C., Crossley Jr, D.A. & Hendrix, P.F. 2004. Fundamentals of soil ecology, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, 408 pp.Google Scholar
Cosby, B.J., Hornberger, G.M., Clapp, R.B. & Ginn, T.R. 1984. A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water Resources Research, 20, 682–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtright, E.M., Wall, D.W. & Virginia, R.A. 2001. Determining habitat suitability for soil invertebrates in an extreme environment: the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 13, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Kadi, A.I. 1985. On estimating the hydraulic properties of soil, Part 1. Comparison between forms to estimate the soil-water characteristic function. Advances in Water Resources, 8, 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fountain, A.G., Lyons, W.B., Burkins, M.B., et al. 1999. Physical controls on the Taylor Valley ecosystem, Antarctica. BioScience, 49, 961–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freckman, D.W. & Virginia, R.A. 1997. Low-diversity Antarctic nematode communities: distribution and response to disturbance. Ecology, 78, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In Klute, A., ed. Methods of soil analysis Part 1: physical and mineralogical methods. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, 1358 pp.Google Scholar
Griffin, D.M. 1981. Water and microbial stress. Advances in Microbial Ecology, 5, 91–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haverkamp, R. & Parlange, J.-Y. 1986. Predicting the water-retention curve from particle-size distribution: 1. Sandy soils without organic matter. Soil Science, 142, 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H.W., Wall, D.H., DeCrappeo, N.M. & Brenner, J.S. 2001. A model for nematode locomotion in soil. Nematology, 3, 705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H.W., Antle, J.M. & Paustian, K. 2003. False determinations of chaos in short noisy time series. Physica D, 180, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killham, K. 1994. Soil ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 260 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klute, A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. In Klute, A., ed. Methods of soil analysis Part 1: physical and mineralogical methods. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, 635–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn, D.M. & Doran, J.W. 1984. Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous dioxide production in tilled and non-tilled soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 48, 1267–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCuen, R.H., Rawls, W.J. & Brakensiek, D.L. 1981. Statistical analysis of the Brooks-Corey and the Green-Ampt parameters across soil textures. Water Resources Research, 17, 1005–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGill, W.B., Hunt, H.W., Woodmansee, R.G. & Reuss, J.O. 1981. PHOENIX, a model of the dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in grassland soils. Ecological Bulletin (Stockholm), 33, 49–115.Google Scholar
Parsons, A.N., Barrett, J.E., Wall, D.H. & Virginia, R.A. 2004. Soil carbon dioxide flux in Antarctic Dry Valley ecosystems. Ecosystems, 7, 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J. & Bockheim, J.G. 1980. Soil development on moraines of Taylor Glacier, lower Taylor Valley, Antarctica. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porazinska, D.L., Wall, D.H. & Virginia, R.A. 2002. Population age structure of nematodes in the Antarctic Dry Valleys: perspectives on time, space, and habitat suitability. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 34, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, E.D. & Shipp, R.F. 1978. Soil water retention as related to particle size in selected sands and loamy sands. Soil Science, 126, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, C. & Nimmo, J.R. 1994. Modeling of soil water retention from saturation to oven dryness. Water Resources Research, 30, 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakaguchi, A., Nishimura, T. & Kato, M. 2005. The effect of entrapped air on the quasi-saturated soil hydraulic conductivity and comparison with the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Vadose Zone Journal, 4, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel-Issem, C.M., Burger, J.A., Powers, R.F., Ponder, F. & Patterson, S.C. 2005. Seedling growth as a function of soil density and water content. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D.C., Bromley, A.M. & Craig, R.M.F. 1971. Ground temperatures in an Antarctic dry valley. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 14, 477–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treonis, A.M. & Wall, D.H. 2005. Soil nematodes and desiccation survival in the extreme arid environment of the Antarctic Dry Valleys. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45, 741–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treonis, A.M., Wall, D.H. & Virginia, R.A. 1999. Invertebrate biodiversity in Antarctic Dry Valley soils and sediments. Ecosystems, 2, 482–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treonis, A.M., Wall, D.H. & Virginia, R.A. 2000. The use of anhydrobiosis by soil nematodes in the Antarctic Dry Valleys. Functional Ecology, 14, 460–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treonis, A.M., Wall, D.H. & Virginia, R.A. 2002. Field and microcosm studies of decomposition and soil biota in a cold desert soil. Ecosystems, 5, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ugolini, F.C. 1963. Soil investigations in the Lower Wright Valley, Antarctica. Proceedings of the International Permafrost Conference. National Academy of Sciences National Research Council Publication Number 1287, 55–61.Google Scholar
Ugolini, F.C. & Anderson, D.M. 1973. Ionic migration and weathering in frozen Antarctic soils. Soil Science, 115, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Genuchten, M.T. 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vereecken, H., Maes, J., Feyen, J. & Darius, P. 1989. Estimating the soil moisture retention characteristic from texture, bulk density, and carbon content. Soil Science, 148, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vishniac, H.S. 1993. The microbiology of Antarctic soils. In Friedmann, E.I., ed. Antarctic microbiology. New York: Wiley-Liss, 297–341.Google Scholar
Wall, D.H. & Virginia, R.A. 1999. Controls on soil biodiversity: insights from extreme environments. Applied Soil Ecology, 13, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, A.W., Sparling, G.P., Feltham, C.W. & Reynolds, J. 1992. Microbial activity and survival in soils dried at different rates. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 30, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, K.A. 2005. Development of property-transfer models for estimating the hydraulic properties of deep sediments at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5114, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Wösten, J.H.M., Pachepsky, Y.A. & Rawls, W.J. 2001. Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing hydraulic characteristics. Journal of Hydrology, 251, 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeiliguer, A.M., Pachepsky, Y.A. & Rawls, W.J. 2000. Estimating water retention of sandy soils using the additivity hypothesis. Soil Science, 165, 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar