Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:40:21.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accounting for local scale variability in benthos: implications for future assessments of latitudinal trends in the coastal Ross Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2006

Vonda Cummings
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 14-901, Wellington, New Zealand
Simon Thrush
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand
Alf Norkko
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand present address: Finnish Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 33, FIN-00931 Helsinki, Finland
Neil Andrew
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 14-901, Wellington, New Zealand present address: WorldFish Center, PO Box 500, GPO, Penang, Malaysia
Judi Hewitt
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand
Greig Funnell
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand
Anne-Maree Schwarz
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand present address:WorldFish Center, PO Box 77, Gizo, Solomon Islands

Abstract

This paper is a contribution to the Latitudinal Gradient Project. It describes macro and epifaunal assemblages and habitats at three shallow water locations at the southern end of the western Ross Sea coast, and investigates relationships between faunal composition and environmental characteristics. Many variables (e.g. substrate type, sediment composition, depth, latitude, longitude) contributed to explaining the differences in community composition between locations, with latitude (a likely surrogate for broader scale factors, e.g. ice cover) one of the most important. The percentage explained by environmental characteristics was strongly scale dependent, decreasing with increasing scale of observation. As much as 66% and 75% of the variability in macrofaunal and epifaunal assemblages, respectively, was explained at the smallest scale (i.e. between transects within a location), compared to 9–18% and 11–32%, respectively, at the scale of the entire study. This relationship was also true for species richness and total abundance. This suggests that while small-scale habitat variability will not confound our ability to detect latitudinal gradients in future studies, adequately quantifying the environmental factors important in structuring these communities at larger (latitudinal) spatial scales will be important. Finally, large differences in habitat structure did not translate into large differences in the diversity of fauna, illustrating the difficulty of predicting faunal composition in the Ross Sea based on seafloor topography alone.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Antarctic Science Ltd 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)