Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:42:26.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Short Note: A method for sexing the chicks of Antarctic shags

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2007

R. Casaux*
Affiliation:
Instituto Antártico Argentino, Cerrito 1248, 1010 Buenos Aires, Argentina and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Av. Rivadavia 1917, 1033 Buenos Aires, Argentina Present address: Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Ecología y Sistemática Animal (LIESA), Ruta 259 km. 5, Planta de Aromáticas, 9200 Esquel, Chubut, Argentina
A. Ramón
Affiliation:
Subsecretaría de Medioambiente, Municipalidad de Esquel, Mitre 524, 9200 Esquel, Chubut, Argentina
A. Baroni
Affiliation:
Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 1113 Buenos Aires, Argentina

Extract

Several studies have been carried out during the last fifteen years on reproduction, population dynamics and diet of the Antarctic shag, Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis Murphy, at different localities in the South Shetland Islands (reviewed in Casaux & Barrera-Oro 2006). In both the colonies studied and in other colonies counted we observed that the number of breeding pairs was steadily decreasing (Casaux & Barrera-Oro 2006). Casaux & Baroni (2002) had earlier suggested that such a decreasing trend might be related, at least partially, to a marked decrease in the inshore populations of two fish prey species, the marbled notothen Notothenia rossii Richardson and the humphead notothen Gobionotothen gibberifrons Lönnberg (Barrera-Oro et al. 2000), which had been studied over a period of 19 years in coastal waters of the South Shetland Islands. Exactly how a reduction in prey availability affects the shag populations (e.g. migration of breeders to other colonies in the area or to new breeding areas, a decrease in the rate of recruitment, an increase in adult mortality, variation in the age at first breeding, etc) is not clear. To investigate this, we started a banding programme at Nelson Island, South Shetland Islands. We postulated that the processes might operate with different intensities on individuals of different sexes, so all individuals in each population studied needed to be sexed. This posed problems for chicks which have monomorphic plumage and no differences in vocalisations (Casaux & Baroni 2000), so that the normal methods for sexing in the field would not work. As most of the external morphological characters in the chicks of Antarctic shags have stabilized by 45–50 days old (Casaux 1998), Casaux & Baroni (2000) had suggested that the use of discriminant functions originally developed for adults could be an appropriate method to sex chicks more than 50 days old.

Type
Short Note
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brothers, N. 1985. Breeding biology, diet and morphometrics of the king shag, Phalacrocorax albiventer purpurascens, at Macquarie Island. Australian Wildlife Research, 12, 8194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrera-Oro, E., Marschoff, E. & Casaux, R. 2000. Trends in relative abundance of fjord Notothenia rossii, Gobionotothen gibberifrons and Notothenia coriiceps at South Shetland Islands, after commercial fishing in the area. CCAMLR Science, 7, 4352.Google Scholar
Burger, A. 1980. Sexual size dimorphism and aging characters in the lesser sheathbill at Marion Island. Ostrich, 51, 3943.Google Scholar
Casaux, R. 1998. Biología reproductiva y ecología alimentaria del Cormorán Antártico Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis (Aves, Phalacrocoracidae) en las Islas Shetland del Sur, Antártida. PhD thesis, University of La Plata, 262 pp. [Unpublished]Google Scholar
Casaux, R. & Baroni, A. 2000. Sexual size dimorphism in the Antarctic shag. Waterbirds, 23, 490494.Google Scholar
Casaux, R. & Baroni, A. 2002. Does fish prey size affect the foraging patterns and breeding output of the Antarctic shag Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis? CCAMLR, Document WG-EMM-02/04, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Casaux, R. & Barrera-Oro, E. 2006. Shags in Antarctica: their feeding behaviour and ecological role in the marine food web. Antarctic Science, 18, 314.Google Scholar
Green, K. 1997. Biology of the Heard Island shag Phalacrocorax nivalis. 1: Breeding behaviour. Emu, 97, 6066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar