Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:52:44.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mycenae Revisited Part 1. The Human Remains from Grave Circle A: Stamatakis, Schliemann and Two New Faces From Shaft Grave VI1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Lena Papazoglou-Manioudaki ,
Argyro Nafplioti ,
J.H. Musgrave ,
R.A.H. Neave ,
Denise Smith  and
A.J.N.W. Prag
Lena Papazoglou-Manioudaki
Affiliation:
National Archaeological Museum, Athens
Argyro Nafplioti
Affiliation:
Wiener Laboratory, ASCSA
J.H. Musgrave
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, University of Bristol
R.A.H. Neave
Affiliation:
RN-DS Partnership, Manchester
Denise Smith
Affiliation:
RN-DS Partnership, Manchester
A.J.N.W. Prag
Affiliation:
The Manchester Museum, University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Building work at the National Archaeological Museum in Athens in 2003 led to the rediscovery of the two male skeletons from Shaft Grave VI at Mycenae, found by Panayiotis Stamatakis in 1877 as he completed the excavation of Grave Circle A begun by Schliemann. The find provided a triple opportunity. First came a re-assessment of Stamatakis's important and often pioneering role both at Mycenae and in the archaeology of the later Bronze Age, which has generally been overlooked both because of Schliemann's very vocal antagonism and because of his own overwork and early death. Second, a detailed study of the skulls along with the post-cranial bones allowed a reconstruction of the faces of the two men to set beside the earlier reconstructions of the faces of seven individuals from Grave Circle B. This showed that although the two men were very likely related to each other, one could not demonstrate kinship with any of the seven faces from Circle B on the basis of their facial appearance alone. Finally – to be described in subsequent articles – it opened the way for the first modern morphological and chemical analysis (using strontium isotope ratios) of the entire collection of surviving human skeletal material from Grave Circle A to determine the number of individuals represented, their biological sex and their age at death. By assessing the quality of their living conditions as reflected in their skeletal and dental health, and by exploring skeletal evidence of engagement in physical activities through activity-related modifications there was the opportunity to reconstruct the lifestyle of the men and women buried in the grave circle.

Οικοδομικές δραστηριότητες στο Εθνικό Αρχαιολογικό Μουσείο στην Αθήνα το 2003 οδήγησαν στην ανακάλυψη εκ νέου των δύο ανδρικών σκελετών από το Λακκοειδή Τάφο VI, που αττοκάλυψε ο Παναγιώτης Σταματάκης το 1877 με την ολοκλήρωση της ανασκαφής του Ταφικού Κύκλου Α, η οποία ξεκίνησε από τον Heinrich Schliemann. Αυτό το εύρημα μας έδωσε μία τριπλή ευκαιρία. Πρώτον, επαναξιολογήθηκε ο σημανηκός και συχνά πρωτοποριακός ρόλος, που διαδραμάτισε ο Σταματάκης στις Μυκήνες και την αρχαιολογία της ύστερης Εποχής του Χαλκού. Ο ρόλος του αυτός γενικά παραβλέφθηκε εξαιτίας τόσο του έντονου ανταγωνισμού εκ μέρους του Schliemann όσο κοα του υπερβολικού φόρτου εργασίας αλλά και του πρώιμου θανάτου του Σταματάκη. Δεύτερον, η λεπτομερής μελέτη των κρανίων και μετα-κρανιακών οστών επέτρεψε την αποκατάσταση των προσώπων των δύο ανδρών και τη σύγκρισή τους με τα πρόσωπα επτά ατόμων από τον Ταφικό Κύκλο Β, τα οποία είχαν νωρίτερα αποκατασταθεί. Αυτή η σύγκριση έδειξε ότι παρά την πιθανή συγγένεια των δύο ανδρών του τάφου VI, δεν μπορεί να υποστηριχθεί ανάλογη σχέση μεταξύ αυτών και των επτά προσώπων από τον Ταφικό Κύκλο Β με μόνο κρντήριο τα φυσιογνωμικά τους χαρακτηριστικά. Τέλος, όπως θα παρουσιαστεί σε επόμιενα άρθρα, η μελέτη αυτή άνοιξε το δρόμο για την πρώτη σύγχρονη μορφολογική και χημική ανάλυση (της ισοτοπικής αναλογίας του στροντίου) ολόκληρης της συλλογής ανθρωπίνων σκελετικών υπολειμμάτων από τον Ταφικό Κύκλο Α, με στόχο τον προσδιορισμό του αριθμού των αντιπροσωπευομένων ατόμων και τον καθορισμό του βιολογικού φύλου και της ηλικίας θανάτου αυτών. Αξιολογώντας την ποιότητα των συνθηκών διαβίωσης των ατόμων αυτών, όπως αυτή ανπκατροπτίζεται στη σκελετική και οδοντική τους υγεία, και εξετάζοντας σκελετικές μοφτυρίες yrn την ενασχόλησή τους με φυσικές δραστηριότητες κατέστη δυνατό να ανασυνθέσουμε τον τρόπο ζωής των ανδρών και γυναικών ττου είχαν ταφεί στον Ταφικό Κύκλο Α.

Type
Articles
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 104 , November 2009 , pp. 233 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Åkerström, Å. 1978. ‘Mycenaean Problems II. Four Bronze Casings from Shaft Grave III at Mycenae’, OpAth XII, 38–68.Google Scholar
Angel, J.L. 1964. ‘Osteoporosis: Thalassemia?’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 22, 369–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, J.L. 1966. ‘Porotic Hyperostosis, Anemias, Malarias and Marshes in the Prehistoric Eastern Mediterranean’, Science, 153, 760–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angel, J.L. 1973. ‘Human Skeletons from Grave Circles at Mycenae’, in Mylonas, G.E. (ed), O Tafikos Kyklos B ton Mykinon (Library of the Archaeological Society at Athens, 73; Athens), 379–97.Google Scholar
Biegen, C.W. 1941. ‘The “Halberd” from the Sixth Shaft Grave’ in Epitymbion Chr. Tsounta (Athens), 423–8.Google Scholar
Bouwman, A.S., Brown, K.A., Prag, A.J.N.W. and Brown, T.A. 2008. ‘Kinship between burials from Grave Circle B at Mycenae revealed by ancient DNA typing’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35: 2580–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwman, A.S., Brown, K.A., Brown, T.A., Chilvers, E.R. and Prag, A.J.N.W. 2009. ‘Kinship in Aegean Prehistory? Ancient DNA in human bones from Greece and Crete’. BSA 104, 293–309.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D.R. 1981. Digging Up Bones, 3rd edn. (London).Google Scholar
Brown, T.A., Brown, K.A., Flaherty, C.F., Little, L.M. and Prag, A.J.N.W. 2000. ‘DNA analysis of bones from Grave Circle B at Mycenae: a first report’, BSA 95, 115–19.Google Scholar
Buikstra, J.E. and Ubelaker, D.H. 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains (Arkansas Archaeological Survey Report Number, 44: Fayetteville, AR).Google Scholar
Calder, W. III and Traill, D. 1986. Myth, Scandal and History: The Heinrich Schliemann Controversy and a First Edition of the Mycenaean Diary (Detroit).Google Scholar
Campillo, D. 1991. ‘The possibility of diagnosing meningiomas in palaeopathology’, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 1, 225–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capasso, L., Kennedy, K.A.R. and Wilczak, C.A. 1999. Atlas of Occupational Markers on Human Remains (Journal of Paleontology, Monograph Publication, 3: Teramo).Google Scholar
Chilvers, E.R., Bouwman, A.S., Brown, K.A., Arnott, R.G., Prag, A.J.N.W. and Brown, T.A. 2008. ‘Ancient DNA in human bones from Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in Greece and Crete'’, Journal of'Archaeological Science, 35: 2707–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demakopoulou, K. 1990 a. ‘Mycenae’ in Demakopoulou (1990b), 88–105.Google Scholar
Demakopoulou, K. (ed.). 1990 b. Troy, Mycenae, Tiryns, Orchomenos. Heinrich Schliemann: The 100th anniversary of his death (Athens).Google Scholar
Dickinson, O. 2005. ‘The “face of Agamemnon“’, Hesperia, 74, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, S. 1991. The Argolid at the Transition to the Mycenaean Age: Studies in the Chronology and Cultural Development in the Shaft Grave Period (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Dwight, T. 1905. ‘The size of the articular surfaces of the long bones as characteristics of sex; an anthropological study’, American Journal of Anatomy, 4, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genovés, S. 1969. ‘Sex determination in early man’, in Brothwell, D.R. and Higgs, E. (eds.), Science in Archaeology: A Survey of Progress and Research, 2nd edn. (London), 429–40.Google Scholar
Graziadio, G. 1969. ‘The process of social stratification at Mycenae in the Shaft Grave Period: a comparative examination of the evidence’, AJA 95, 403–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R.J. 1953. ‘Examination of the two skeletons in respect of sex, age and stature’, in Camps, F.E., Medical and Scientific Investigations in the Christie Case (London), 74–99.Google Scholar
Holtby, J.R.D. 1918. ‘Some indices and measurements of the modern femur’, Journal of Anatomy, 52, 363–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Hillson, S. 2002. Dental Anthropology, 3rd edn. (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Howells, W.W. 1973. Cranial Variation in Man: A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference among Recent Human Populations (Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, 67; Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Iakovidis, S.E. 1983. Late Helladic Citadels in Mainland Greece (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iakovidis, S.E. and French, E.B. 2003. Archaeological Atlas of Mycenae (Athens).Google Scholar
Karo, G. 1930–1933. Die Schachtgräber von Mykenai (Munich).Google Scholar
Kavvadias, P. 1894. Les Musées d Athènes: Musée National, Musée d'Acropole (Athens).Google Scholar
Kavvadias, P. 1914. Προϊστορική ἈρΧαιολογία (Athens).Google Scholar
Kaur, H., Harjeet Sahni, D. and Jit, I. 2002. ‘Length and curves of the clavicle in Northwest Indians’, Journal of the Anatomical Society of India, 51, 199–209.Google Scholar
Kilian-Dirlmeier, I. 1986. ‘Beobachtungen zu den Schachtgräbern von Mykenai und zu den Schmuckbeigaben mykenischer Männergräber’, Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 33. 1, 159–98.Google Scholar
Kilian-Dirlmeier, I. 1988. ‘Jewellery in Mycenaean and Minoan “warrior graves“’, in French, E.B and Wardle, K.A. (eds), Problems in Greek Prehistory (Bristol), 161–72.Google Scholar
Kondakis, I. and Kastorchis, E. 1878. ‘Περί τών Παρά τήν NανΠλίαν ΠαναρΧαίων τάφων’, Athenaion, 7, 183–201.Google Scholar
Korres, G. 1974. Bιβλιογραφία Ἐρρίκον Σλήμαν (Athens).Google Scholar
Koumanoudis, S. 1878. Report on Etaireia excavations for 1878, in Πρακτικά της έν Ἀθήνανς ἈρΧαιογολικης Ἐταιρείας, 4–30.Google Scholar
Koumanoudis, S. 1892. Report on Etaireia excavations for 1892, in Πρακτικά της έν Ἀθήνανς ἈρΧαιογολικης Ἐταιρείας, 5–64.Google Scholar
Koumanoudis, S. 1893. Report on Etaireia excavations for 1893, in Πρακτικά της έν Ἀθήνανς ἈρΧαιογολικης Ἐταιρείας, 7–30.Google Scholar
Koumanoudis, S. and Kastorchis, E. 1877. ‘Οί έν ΣΠάτα Ἀττικής άρΧαιοι τάφοι’, Athenaion, 6, 167–72, pls. ε,ζ.Google Scholar
Mann, R.W. and Murphy, S.p. 1990. Regional Atlas of Bone Disease: A Guide to Pathologic and Normal Variation in the Human Skeleton (Springfield, IL).Google Scholar
Milchhöfer, A. 1881. Die Museen Athens (Athens).Google Scholar
Molnar, S. 1971. ‘Human tooth wear, tooth function and cultural variability’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 34, 175–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, D.H. 1973. ‘Bushman maxillary canine polymorphism’, South African Journal of Science, 71, 333–5.Google Scholar
Mountjoy, RA. 1999. Regional Mycenaean Decorated Pottery (Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Rahden).Google Scholar
Mylonas, G.E. 1983. Mycenae Rich in Gold (Athens).Google Scholar
Nafplioti, A. 2007. Population Bio-cultural History in the South Aegean during the Bronze Age (unpublished PhD diss., University of Southampton).Google Scholar
Neave, R.A.H. 2004. ‘Facial mapping,’ in Bogan, p. (ed.), Identification: Investigation, Trial and Scientific Evidence (London), 277–86.Google Scholar
Olivier, G. 1951. ‘Anthropologie de la clavicule III — La clavicule du Français’, Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 2, 121–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, D.J. 2003. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains, 2nd edn. (San Diego).Google Scholar
Ortner, D.J. and Putschar, W.G.J. 1981. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skehtal Remains (Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, 28; Washington and London).Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Th. J. 1998. The Late Bronze Age Daggers of the Aegean I: The Greek Mainland (Prähistorische Bronzefunde VI.11: Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Papazoglou-Manioudaki, L. in press. Ἐθνικὰ ἈρΧαιολογικὰ Mουσείο. Προϊστορική Συλλογή’ in A.Delt. Chr. 58 (2003).Google Scholar
Parsons, F.G. 1914. ‘The characters of the English thigh-bone’, Journal of Anatomy and Physiology, 48, 238–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Parsons, F.G. 1915. ‘The characters of the English thigh-bone: Part II: The difficulty of sexing’, Journal of Anatomy and Physiology, 49, 345–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Parsons, F.G. 1916. ‘On the proportions and characteristics of the modern English clavicle’, Journal of Anatomy, 51, 71–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Pearson, K. and Bell, J. 1919. ‘A study of the long bones of the English skeleton’, Drapers' Company Research Memoirs, Biometrie Series, 10 (London).Google Scholar
Petrakos, V. 1987 a. H εν Ἀθήναις ἈρΧαολογική Ἐταφεία. H ιστορία των 150 Χρὰνων της 1837–1987 (Athens).Google Scholar
Petrakos, V. 1987 b. Ίδεογραφία φης εν Ἀθήναις ἈρΧαιολιγικής Ἐταιρείας’, Arch. Eph. 23–181.Google Scholar
Petrakos, V. 1990. ‘Panayiotis Stamatakis and the Excavation at Mycenae,’ in Demakopoulou (1990b), 106–12.Google Scholar
Philadelpheus, A. 1928. Mνημεια τών Ἀθηνών (Athens).Google Scholar
Philadelpheus, A. 1935. The Museum of Athens (Athens).Google Scholar
Philips, J. 2006. ‘Petrie, the “outsider looking on“’, in Mythos: La préhistoire égéenne du XIXe au XXIe siècle après J.-C. (BCH Suppl. 46), 143–57.Google Scholar
Prag, A.J.N.W. and Neave, R. 1997 (repr. with corrections 1999). Making Faces Using Archaeological and Forensic Evidence (London).Google Scholar
Prag, A.J.N.W., Musgrave, J.H., Neave, R.A.H., and Thimme, D.I. 1995. ‘Seven faces from Grave Circle B at Mycenae’, BSA 90, 107–36.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. and Waldron, T. 1995. A Field Guide to Joint Disease in Archaeology (Chichester).Google Scholar
Rucknagel, D.L. 1966. ‘On the Geographical Distribution and Ethnic Origin of Thalassaemia’, New Zealand Medical Journal, 65, 825–32.Google Scholar
Schliemann, H. 1880. Mycenae: A Narrative of Researches and Discoveries at Mycenae and Tiryns (New York).Google Scholar
Schliemann, H. 1882. Catalogue des trésors de Mycènes au Musée d'Athènes (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Schliemann, H. 1886 Tiryns (London).Google Scholar
Schuchhardt, C. 1891. Schliemann's Ausgrabungen in Troja, Tiryns, Mykenä, Ithaka (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Singh, S. 1969 *. ‘Sexing of American clavicles’, Journal of Anatomical Society of India, 18, 25 (Abstract). [*1972 in text of Kaur et al. (2002)]Google Scholar
Smith, B.H. 1991. ‘Standards of human bone formation and dental age assessment’, in Kelly, M.A., and Larsen, C.S. (eds.), Advances in Dental Anthropology (New York), 143–68.Google Scholar
Stais, V. 1909/1915. Collection Mycénienne du Musée National, Athènes (Athens).Google Scholar
Stais, V. 1926. Mycenaean Collection of the National Museum, Athens (Athens).Google Scholar
Stamatakis, P. 1878. ‘Περί του Παρά το Ηραιον καθαριςθέντος τάφφο’, Ath. Mitt. 3, 271–86.Google Scholar
Stewart, T.D. 1979. Essentials of Forensic Anthropology (Springfield, IL).Google Scholar
Stuart-Macadam, P.L. 1989. ‘Porotic Hyperostosis: relationship between orbital and vault lesions’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 80, 187–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terry, R.J. 1932. ‘The clavicle of the American negro’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 16, 351–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieme, F.P. and Schuil, W.J. 1957. ‘Sex determination from the skeleton’, Human Biology, 29, 242–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Thomas, H. 1938–1939. ‘The Acropolis Treasure from Mycenae’, BSA 39, 65–87.Google Scholar
Trotter, M. 1970. ‘Estimation of stature from intact long bones’, in Stewart, T.D. (ed.), Personal Identification in Mass Disasters (Washington, DC), 71–83.Google Scholar
Traill, D. 1995. Schliemann of Troy: Treasure and Deceit (London).Google Scholar
Tsountas, Chr. 1888. ‘Aνασκαφαί τάφων έν Mυκήναις’, Arch. Eph. 119–80.Google Scholar
Tsountas, Chr. and Manatt, J. 1897. The Mycenaean Age (Boston).Google Scholar
Turner, C., Nichol, C. and Scott, G. 1991. ‘Scoring procedures for key morphological traits for the permanent dentition: the Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System’, in Kelley, M. and Larsen, C. (eds.), Advances in Dental Anthropology (New York), 13–31.Google Scholar
Tyrell, A.J. and Chamberlain, A.T. 1998. ‘Non-metric trait evidence for modern human affinities and the distinctiveness of Neanderthals’, Journal of Human Evolution, 34, 549–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubelaker, D. 1992. ‘Porotic hyperostosis in prehistoric Ecuador’, in Stuart-Macadam, P. and Kent, S. (eds.), Diet, Demography, andDisease (New York), 201–17.Google Scholar
Van Gerven, D.P. 1972. ‘The contribution of size and shape variation to patterns of sexual dimorphism of the human femur’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 37, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasilikou, D. 2006. Oι ανασκαφές Aης ἈρΧαιολογικής Ἐταιρείας στις Kυκλάδες 1872–1910 (Athens).Google Scholar
Velsink, J.G. 2003. ‘The Ivories from the Shaft Graves at Mycenae’, BABesch 78, 1–33.Google Scholar
Waldron, T. 1998. ‘An unusual cluster of meningiomas?’, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 8, 213–17.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, T. 2007. Palaeoepidemiology: The Measure of Disease in the Human Past (Walnut Creek, CA).Google Scholar
White, T.D. and Folkens, P.A. 2000. Human Osteology, 2nd edn. (San Diego, CA).Google Scholar
Younger, J.G. 1997. ‘The stelai of Mycenae Grave Circles A and B’, TέΧνη (Aegaeum, 16; Liège), 229–39.Google Scholar