Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:37:26.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phylogeographic patterns of mtDNA reflecting the colonization of the Canary Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1999

J. C. RANDO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna, Tenerife
V. M. CABRERA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna, Tenerife
J. M. LARRUGA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna, Tenerife
M. HERNÁNDEZ
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna, Tenerife
A. M. GONZÁLEZ
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna, Tenerife
F. PINTO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna, Tenerife
H.-J. BANDELT
Affiliation:
Mathematisches Seminar, Universität Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Although the Canary Islands were settled by humans, possibly of Berber origin, as late as 2500 years ago, the precise course and numbers of early migrations to the archipelago remain controversial. We have therefore analysed mtDNA variation (HVS-I as well as selected RFLP sites) in 300 individuals from the seven Canary Islands. The distribution and variation across the islands in a specific mtDNA clade of Northwest African ancestry suggest that there was one dominant initial settlement process that affected all the islands, from east to west. This indicates that a certain genetic affinity of present-day Canary Islanders to Northwest African Berbers mainly stems from the autochthonous population rather than slaves captured on the neighbouring African coast. The slave trade after the European conquest left measurable, though minor, traces in the mtDNA pool of the Canary Islands, which in its majority testifies to the European immigration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© University College London 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)