Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:49:11.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Froot-Stein Model Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2011

N. Høgh
Affiliation:
Deloitte, Postboks 1600, 0900 kbh. C., Denmark., Email: [email protected]
O. Linton
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, U.K., Email: [email protected]
J. P. Nielsen
Affiliation:
Royal&SunAlliance Codan, 60 Gammel Kongevej, DK-1790 Copenhagen V, Denmark., Email: [email protected]

Abstract

We investigate the model of Froot & Stein (1998), a model which has very strong implications for risk management. We argue that their conclusions are too strong and need to be qualified. We also argue that their analysis is incorrect and incomplete. Specifically, there are some unusual consequences of their model, which may be linked to the chosen pricing formula.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cochrane, J.H. (2001). Asset pricing. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Dimson, E., Marsh, P. & Staunton, M. (2002). Global evidence on the equity risk premium. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Froot, K.A., Scharfstein, D.S. & Stein, J.C. (1993). Risk management: coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. The Journal of Finance, XLVIII(5), 16291658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froot, K.A. & Stein, J.C. (1998). Risk management, capital budgeting, and capital structure policy for financial institutions: an integrated approach. The Journal of Financial Economics, 47, 5582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J., Huber, P. & Koch, P. (2001). The economics of insurance: how insurers create value for shareholders. Swiss Re: Technical Publishing.Google Scholar
Høgh, N. (2003). Conscious risk selection using shareholder value as optimality measure. Thesis for degree Cand, Act. University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Lo, A.W. (2002). The statistics of Sharpe Ratios. Financial Analysts Journal. July/August, 3652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, M. (1963). Calculus. Schaum Outline Series, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar