Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:43:09.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Income Inequality over the Later-Life Course: a Comparative Analysis of Seven OECD Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2011

R. L. Brown  and
S. G. Prus
R. L. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1., Email: [email protected]
S. G. Prus
Affiliation:
Carleton University, D795 Loeb, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K15 5B6, Canada., Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines income inequality over stages of the later-life course (age 45 and older) and systems which can be used to mitigate this inequality. Two hypotheses are tested: (1) levels of income inequality decline during old age because public benefits are more equally distributed than work income; and (2) because of the progressive nature of government benefits, countries with stronger public income security programmes are better able to reduce income inequalities during old age. The analysis is performed by comparing age groups within seven OECD countries (Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America) using Luxembourg Income Study data from around 2000. Both hypotheses are supported. Several conclusions are drawn from the findings.

Keywords

Income InequalitySocial SecurityRetirement Income Security
Type
Papers
Information
Annals of Actuarial Science , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , September 2006 , pp. 307 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, R.L. & Ip, J. (2000). Social security: adequacy, equity, and progressiveness: a review of criteria based on experience in Canada and the United States. North American Actuarial Journal, 2, 1–33.Google Scholar
Brown, R.L. & Prus, S.G. (2004). Social transfers and income inequality in old age: a multinational perspective. North American Actuarial Journal, 8, 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, S. & Waehrer, K. (1996). Later-life economic inequality in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Gerontology, 51B, S307-S318.Google Scholar
Knox, D. & Cornish, R. (1997). The development of some criteria for equity in national retirement income systems. Working paper series. University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000). Reforms for an ageing society. Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001). Ageing and income: financial resources and retirement in 9 OECD countries. Paris.Google Scholar
Palmer, B.A. (2001). 2001 GSU/aon RETIRE project report. Center for Risk Management and Insurance. Georgia State University.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice, Revised edition, 1999. Harvard University Press and Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regie des rentes du Quebec (2004). Evaluation of the Quebec system of financial security at retirement in relation to that of other industrialized countries. Province of Quebec.Google Scholar
Smeeding, T.M. (1991). Cross-national comparisons of inequality and poverty position. In Economic inequality and poverty: international perspectives, 39–59. Edited by Osberg, L.. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar