Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T19:17:50.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cohort effects in mortality modelling: a Bayesian state-space approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2018

Man Chung Fung ,
Gareth W. Peters  and
Pavel V. Shevchenko Open the ORCID record for Pavel V. Shevchenko [Opens in a new window]
Man Chung Fung
Affiliation:
Data61, CSIRO, Sydney, NSW 2122, Australia
Gareth W. Peters
Affiliation:
Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Pavel V. Shevchenko*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Finance and Actuarial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
*
*Correspondence to: Pavel V. Shevchenko, Department of Applied Finance and Actuarial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cohort effects are important factors in determining the evolution of human mortality for certain countries. Extensions of dynamic mortality models with cohort features have been proposed in the literature to account for these factors under the generalised linear modelling framework. In this paper we approach the problem of mortality modelling with cohort factors incorporated through a novel formulation under a state-space methodology. In the process we demonstrate that cohort factors can be formulated naturally under the state-space framework, despite the fact that cohort factors are indexed according to year-of-birth rather than year. Bayesian inference for cohort models in a state-space formulation is then developed based on an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler, allowing for the quantification of parameter uncertainty in cohort models and resulting mortality forecasts that are used for life expectancy and life table constructions. The effectiveness of our approach is examined through comprehensive empirical studies involving male and female populations from various countries. Our results show that cohort patterns are present for certain countries that we studied and the inclusion of cohort factors are crucial in capturing these phenomena, thus highlighting the benefits of introducing cohort models in the state-space framework. Forecasting of cohort models is also discussed in light of the projection of cohort factors.

Keywords

Mortality modellingCohort featuresState-space modelBayesian inferenceMarkov chain Monte Carlo
Type
Paper
Information
Annals of Actuarial Science , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 109 - 144
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrieu, C., Doucet, A. & Holenstein, R. (2010). Particle Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B, 72, 269–342.Google Scholar
Barrieu, P., Bensusan, H., El Karoui, N., Hillairet, C., Loisel, S., Ravanelli, C. & Salhi, Y. (2012). Understanding, modelling and managing longevity risk: key issues and main challenges. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 3, 203–231.Google Scholar
Biffis, E. (2005). Affine processes for dynamic mortality and actuarial valuations. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 37(3), 443–468.Google Scholar
Brouhns, N., Denuit, M. & Vermunt, J.K. (2002). A Poisson log-bilinear regression approach to the construction of projected lifetables. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31, 373–393.Google Scholar
Cairns, A., Blake, D. & Dowd, K. (2006). A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: theory and calibration. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(4), 687–718.Google Scholar
Cairns, A., Blake, D. & Dowd, K. (2008). Modelling and management of mortality risk: a review. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2(3), 79–113.Google Scholar
Cairns, A., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G., Epstein, D., Ong, A. & Balevich, I. (2009). A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality models using data from England and Wales and the United States. North American Actuarial Journal, 13(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Cairns, A., Blake, D., Dowd, K. & Kessler, A.R. (2016). Phantoms never dies: living with unreliable population data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 179(4), 975–1005.Google Scholar
Carter, C. K. & Kohn, R. (1994). On Gibbs sampling for state-space models. Biometrika, 81(3), 541–553.Google Scholar
Celeux, C., Forbes, F., Robert, C.P. & Titterington, D.M. (2006). Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Bayesian Analysis, 1(4), 651–674.Google Scholar
Chan, J.C.C. & Grant, A.L. (2016). On the observed-data deviance information criterion for volatility modelling. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 14(4), 772–802.Google Scholar
Currie, I.D. (2009). Smoothing and forecasting mortality rates with P-splines. Available online at the address http://www.ma.hw.ac.uk/ iain/research.talks.html [accessed 01-Feb-2017].Google Scholar
Currie, I.D. (2016). On fitting generalized linear and non-linear models of mortality. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2016(4), 356–383.Google Scholar
Czado, C., Delwarde, A. & Denuit, M. (2005). Bayesian Poisson log-bilinear mortality projections. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 36, 260–284.Google Scholar
Dahl, M. & Moller, T. (2006). Valuation and hedging of life insurance liabilities with systematic mortality risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 39, 193–217.Google Scholar
De Jong, P. & Tickle, L. (2006). Extending the Lee-Carter mortality forecasting. Mathematical Population Studies, 13, 1–18.Google Scholar
Del Moral, P., Peters, G.W. & Vergé, C. (2013). An introduction to stochastic particle integration methods: With applications to risk and insurance. In J. Dick, F. Kuo, G. Peters & I. Sloan, (Eds.) Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2012. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics (Vol. 65) (pp. 39–81). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Delwarde, A., Denuit, M. & Eilers, P.H.C. (2007). Smoothing the Lee-Carter and Poisson log-bilinear models for mortality forecasting: a penalized likelihood approach. Statistical Modelling, 7, 29–48.Google Scholar
Doucet, A., Pitt, M.K., Deligiannidis, G. & Kohn, R. (2015). Efficient implementation of Markov chain Monte Carlo when using an unbiased likelihood estimator. Biometrika, 102(2), 295–313.Google Scholar
Dowd, K., Cairns, A., Blake, D., Coughlan, G., Epstein, D. & Khalaf-Allah, M. (2010). Evaluating the goodness of fit of stochastic mortality models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 47, 255–265.Google Scholar
Enchev, V., Kleinow, T. & Cairns, A.J.G. (2016). Multi-population mortality models: fitting, forecasting and comparisons. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2017(4), 319–342.Google Scholar
Fung, M. C., Ignatieva, K. & Sherris, M. (2014). Systematic mortality risk: an analysis of guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits in variable annuities. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 58, 103–115.Google Scholar
Fung, M.C., Peters, G.W. & Shevchenko, P.V. (2015). A state-space estimation of the Lee-Carter mortality model and implications for annuity pricing. In T. Weber, M.J. McPhee & R.S. Anderssen, (Eds.), MODSIM2015, 21st International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (pp. 952–958). Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. www.mssanz.org.au/modsim2015/E1/fung.pdf.Google Scholar
Fung, M.C., Peters, G.W. & Shevchenko, P.V. (2017). A unified approach to mortality modelling using state-space framework: characterisation, identification, estimation and forecasting. Annals of Actuarial Science, 11(2), 343–389.Google Scholar
Gourieroux, C. & Monfort, A. (1997). Time Series and Dynamic Models. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haberman, S. & Renshaw, A. (2011). A comparative study of parametric mortality projection models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48, 35–55.Google Scholar
Harvey, A. C. (1989). Forecasting: Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirz, J., Schmock, U. & Shevchenko, P.V. (2017a). Actuarial applications and estimation of extended CreditRisk+. Risks, 5(2), 23:1–23:29.Google Scholar
Hirz, J., Schmock, U. & Shevchenko, P.V. (2017b). Crunching mortality and life insurance portfolios with extended CreditRisk+. Risk Magazine, January, 98–103.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. & Villegas, A. M. (2015). Robustness and convergence in the Lee-Carter model with cohort effects. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 64, 186–202.Google Scholar
Kleinow, T. & Richards, S. J. (2016). Parameter risk in time-series mortality forecasts. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2017(9), 804–828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2016.1255655.Google Scholar
Kogure, A., Kitsukawa, K. & Kurachi, Y. (2009). A Bayesian comparison of models for changing mortalities toward evaluating longevity risk in japan. Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 3(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Kogure, A. & Kurachi, Y. (2010). A Bayesian approach to pricing longevity risk based on risk-neutral predictive distributions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 46, 162–172.Google Scholar
Koissi, M., Shapiro, A.F. & Hognas, G. (2006). Evaluating and extending Lee-Carter model for mortality forecasting: bootstrap confidence interval. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38, 1–20.Google Scholar
Lee, R.D. & Carter, L.R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 659–675.Google Scholar
Leng, X. & Peng, L. (2016). Inference pitfalls in Lee-Carter model for forecasting mortality. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 70, 58–65.Google Scholar
Li, J., Chan, W. & Cheung, S. (2011). Structural changes in the Lee-Carter mortality indexes. North American Actuarial Journal, 15(1), 13–31.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. & Li, J.S.-H. (2016). It’s all in the hidden states: a longevity hedging strategy with an explicit measure of population basis risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 70, 301–319.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. & Li, J.S.-H. (2017). The locally linear Cairns-Blake-Dowd model: a note on delta-nuga hedging of longevity risk. ASTIN Bulletin, 47(1), 79–151.Google Scholar
Luciano, E. & Vigna, E. (2008). Mortality risk via affine stochastic intensities: calibration and empirical relevance. Belgian Actuarial Bulletin, 8(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. (2009). The “golden generations” in historical context. British Actuarial Journal, 15, 151–184.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. (2010). Reexamining the dominance of birth cohort effects on mortality. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 365–390.Google Scholar
O’Hare, C. & Li, Y. (2012). Explaining young mortality. Insurance, Mathematics and Economics, 50, 12–25.Google Scholar
Pedroza, C. (2006). A Bayesian forecasting model: predicting U.S. male mortality. Bio-Statistics, 7(4), 530–550.Google Scholar
Peters, G.W., Targino, R.S. & Wuthrich, M.V. (2017). Bayesian modelling, Monte Carlo sampling and capital allocation of insurance risks. Risks 5, 53. Available at SSRN: 2961888.Google Scholar
Petris, G., Petrone, S. & Campagnoli, P. (2009). Dynamic Linear Models with R. Springer.Google Scholar
Plat, R. (2009). On stochastic mortality modeling. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 45(3), 393–404.Google Scholar
Renshaw, A. & Haberman, S. (2003). Lee-Carter mortality forecasting with age-specific enhancement. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33, 255–272.Google Scholar
Renshaw, A. & Haberman, S. (2006). A cohort-based extension to the Lee-Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38, 556–570.Google Scholar
Shang, H.L., Booth, H. & Hyndman, R.J. (2011). Point and interval forecasts of mortality rates and life expectancy: a comparison of ten principal component methods. Demography, 25(5), 173–214.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, P.V., Hirz, J. & Schmock, U. (2015). Forecasting leading death causes in australia using extended CreditRisk+. In T. Weber, M.J. McPhee & R.S. An-derssen, (Eds.) MODSIM2015, 21st International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (pp. 966–972). Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. www.mssanz.org.au/modsim2015/E1/shevchenko.pdf.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D.J., Best, N.G., Carlin, B.P. & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 64, 583–639.Google Scholar
van Berkum, F., Antonio, K. & Vellekoop, M. (2016). The impact of multiple structural changes on mortality predictions. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2016(7), 581–603.Google Scholar
van Dyk, D.A. & Park, T. (2008). Partially collapsed Gibbs samplers: theory and methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(482), 790–796.Google Scholar
Villegas, A.M., Millossovich, P. & Kaishev, V. (2015). StMoMo: An R package for stochastic mortality modelling. Available at SSRN: 2698729.Google Scholar
Willets, R. C. (2004). The cohort effect: insights and explanations. British Actuarial Journal, 10, 833–877.Google Scholar
Yang, S.S., Yue, J.C. & Huang, H. (2010). Modeling longevity risks using a principal component approach: a comparison with existing stochastic mortality models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 46(1), 254–270.Google Scholar