Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:46:45.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trichoptera as bioindicators of habitat integrity in the Pindaíba river basin, Mato Grosso (Central Brazil)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

Lilian R. Pereira ,
Helena S. R. Cabette  and
Leandro Juen
Lilian R. Pereira*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais – PPGCA, Cidade Universitária, Bloco CELBE, CEP 78.200-000, Cáceres, MT, Brazil
Helena S. R. Cabette
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, BR 158, Km 148, Caixa Postal 08, CEP 78690-000, Nova Xavantina, MT, Brazil
Leandro Juen
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Correia, No. 1, Bairro Guama, CEP 66.075-110, Belém, PA, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We evaluated the influence of environmental integrity and the potential as bioindicator of larval stages of species of Trichoptera in 20 streams of first to fourth order in the Pindaíba river basin, Mato Grosso, Central Brazil. We measured stream integrity with the habitat integrity index (HII), establishing three levels of conservation: preserved, altered and impacted environments. We used (i) simple regression to assess the effect of habitat integrity on species abundance of Trichoptera and (ii) the indicator species analysis (IndVal) to assess the potential as bioindicator of each species. We found that 12 morphospecies showed relationship with HII: six species were bioindicators of preserved and two species of altered environments. Morphospecies that showed relationship in the two analyses (i and ii) were considered strong bioindicators, considering that the other species supported higher environmental variation, becoming evident that loss of physical structure reduces the abundance of organisms specialized in preserved environments. The results showed that the distribution and abundance of trichopterans can be an indicator of habitat integrity. Trichopteran species have bioindicator potential, corroborating the hypotheses of this work that abundance of organisms will be smaller in environments with low integrity, and that many species are specific to preserved environments, disappearing from impacted environments, and also characteristic species of altered environments.

Keywords

Environmental conservationmacroinvertebratesecological integrityCerrado
Type
Research Article
Information
Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , 2012 , pp. 295 - 302
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angermeier, P.L. and Karr, J.R., 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives. Bioscience, 44, 690–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrisano, E.B., 1995. Insecta Trichoptera. In: Lopretto, E.C. and Tell, G. (eds.), Ecossistemas de aguas continentales, metodologia para su estúdio, Ediciones Sul, La Plata, 1199–1227.Google Scholar
Bahar, M.D.M., Ohmori, H. and Yamamuro, M., 2008. Relationship between river water quality and land use in a small river basin running through the urbanizing area of Central Japan. Limnology, 9, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, D.F., Dorvillé, L.F.M., Buss, D.F., Nessimian, J.L. and Soares, L.H.J., 1998. Distribuição de comunidades de insetos aquáticos no gradiente longitudinal de uma bacia fluvial do sudeste brasileiro. Oecol. Bras., 5, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, D.F., Dorvillé, L.F.M., Buss, D.F. and Nessiamian, J.L., 2001. Spatial and temporal organization of aquatic insects assemblages in the longitudinal gradient of a tropical river. Braz. J. Biol., 61, 295–304.Google ScholarPubMed
Bispo, P.C., Oliveira, L.G., Bini, L.M. and Souza, K.G., 2006. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera assemblages from riffles in mountain streams of Central Brazil: environmental factors influencing the distribution and abundance of immatures. Braz. J. Biol., 66, 611–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonada, N., Prat, N., Resh, V.H. and Statzner, B., 2006. Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 51, 495–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brasil, 1981. Projeto RADAMBRASIL, Folha SD 22. Goiás: geologia, geomorfologia, pedologia, vegetação, uso potencial da terra, Ministério das Minas e Energia/Divisão de Publicação, Brasília, 636 p.
Buss, D.F., Baptista, D.F. and Nessimian, J.L., 2003. Bases conceituais para a aplicação de biomonitoramento em programas de avaliação da qualidade da água de rios. Cader. Saúde Públ., 19, 465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortezzi, S.S., Bispo, P. da C., Paciencia, G. de P. and Leite, R.C., 2009. Influencia da ação antrópica sobre a fauna de macroinvertebrados aquáticos em riachos de uma região do Cerrado do sudoeste do Estado de São Paulo. Iheringia, Sér. Zool., 99, 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couceiro, S.R.M., Hamada, N., Luz, S.L.B., Forsberg, B.R. and Pimentel, T.P., 2007. Deforestation and sewage effects on aquatic macroinvertebrates in urban stream in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 575, 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisci-Bispo, V.L., Bispo, P.C. and Froehlich, C.G., 2004. Triplectides larvae in empty cases of Nectopsyche (Trichoptera, Leptoceridae) at Parque Estadual Intervales, São Paulo State, Brazil. Revta Bras. Ent., 48, 133–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisci-Bispo, V.L., Bispo, P.C. and Froehlich, C.G., 2007. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera assemblages in two Atlantic rainforest streams, Southeastern Brazil. Revta Bras. Zool., 24, 312–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, K.W., Merrit, R.W. and Andrade, C.N., 2005. The use of invertebrate functional groups to characterize ecosystem attributes in selected stream in rivers in southeast Brazil. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ., 40, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias-Silva, K., Cabette, H.S.R., Juen, L. and De Marco, P. Jr., 2010. The influence of habitat integrity and physical-chemical water variables on the structure of aquatic and semi-aquatic Heteroptera. Zoologia, 27, 918–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufrêne, M. and Legendre, P., 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr., 67, 345–366.Google Scholar
Ferreira-Peruquetti, P. and De Marco, P. Jr., 2002. Efeito da alteração ambiental sobre comunidades de Odonata em riachos de Mata Atlântica de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revta Bras. Zool., 19, 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidelis, L., Nessimian, J.L. and Hamada, N., 2008. Distribuição espacial de insetos aquáticos em igarapés de pequena ordem na Amazônia Central. Acta Amazon., 38, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, O.S. Jr. and Bueno-Soria, J., 1982. Studies of neotropical caddisflies, XXXII: The immature stages of Macronema variipenne Flint & Bueno, with the division of Macronema by the resurrection of Macrostemum (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 95, 358–370.Google Scholar
Flint, O.S. Jr., Holzenthal, R.W. and Harris, S.C., 1999. Catalog of the Neotropical Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera), Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, OH, 239 p.
Hering, D., Schmidt-Kloiber, A., Murphy, J., Lucke, S., Zamora-Muños, C., Lópes-Rodrígues, M.J., Huber, T. and Graf, W., 2009. Potential impact of climate change on aquatic insects: a sensitivity analysis for European caddisflies (Trichoptera) based on distribution patterns and ecological preferences. Aquat. Sci., 71, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzenthal, R.W. and Hamilton, S.W., 1988. New species and records of Costa Rican Polycentropus (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc., 96, 332–344.Google Scholar
Holzenthal, R.W. and Pes, A.M.O., 2004. A new genus of long-horned caddisfly from the Amazon basin (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae: Grumichellini). Zootaxa, 621, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzenthal, R.W., Blahnik, R.J., Prather, A.L. and Kjer, K.M., 2007. Order Trichoptera Kirby, 1813 (Insecta), caddisflies. Zootaxa, 1668, 639–698.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S.H., 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr., 54, 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juen, L. and De Marco, P. Jr., 2011. Odonate biodiversity in terra-firme forest streamlets in Central Amazonia: on the relative effects of neutral and niche drivers at small geographical extents. Insect Conserv. Divers., 4, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juen, L., Cabette, H.S.R. and De Marco, P. Jr., 2007. Odonate assemblage structure in relation to basin and aquatic habitat structre in Pantanal wetlands. Hydrobiologia, 579, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammert, M. and Allan, J.D., 1999. Assessing biotic integrity of streams: effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrate. Environ. Manage., 23, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins-Silva, M.J., Engel, D.W., Rocha, F.M. and Araújo, J., 2008. Imaturos de Trichoptera na Bacia do Rio Paranã, GO, com novos registros de gênero. Neotrop. Entomol., 37, 735–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, R.W. and Cummins, K.W., 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, Kendall/Hunts, Dubuque, 311 p.
Nessimian, J.L., Venticinque, E.M., Zuanon, J., De Marco, P. Jr., Gordo, M., Fidelis, L., Batista, J.D. and Juen, L., 2008. Land use, habitat integrity and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia, 614, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, G.J. and McDonald, M.E., 2004. Application of ecological indicators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 35, 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueira, D.S., Cabette, H.S.R. and Juen, L., 2011. Estrutura e composição da comunidade de Trichoptera (Insecta) de rios e áreas alagadas da bacia do rio Suiá-Miçú, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Iheringia, Sér Zool., 101 (3): 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, L.G. and Froehlich, C.G., 1997. Diversity and community structure of aquatic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) in a southeastern Brazilian mountain stream. Acta Limnol. Bras., 9, 139–148.Google Scholar
Pather, A.L., 2003. Revision of the neotropical caddisfly Phylloicus (Trichoptera: Calamoceatidae). Zootaxa, 275, 1–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pes, A.M.O., Hamada, N. and Nessimian, J.L., 2005. Chaves de identificação de larvas para famílias e gêneros de Trichoptera (Insecta), da Amazônia Central, Brasil. Revta Bras. Ent., 49, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pes, A.M.O., Hamada, N. and Soares, C.C., 2008. Description of the last-instar larva and pupa and the bionomics of Smicridea (Smicridea) truncata Flint (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in Central Amazonia, Brazil. Zootaxa, 1732, 54–60.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team, 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Accessed online on June 2010, http://www.rproject.org
Reiso, R. and Brittain, J.E., 2000. Life cycle, diet and habitat of Polycentropus jlavomaculatus, Plectrocnemia conspevsa and Rhyacophila nubila (Trichoptera) in Ovre Heimdalen, Jotunheimen Mountains, Norway. Norw. J. Entomol., 47, 113–124.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D.M. and Resh, V.H., 1993. Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg, D.M. and Resh, V.H. (eds.), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Chapman & Hall, London, 1–9.Google Scholar
Shimano, Y., Cabette, H.S.R., Salles, F.F. and Juen, L., 2010. Composição e distribuição da fauna de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) em área de transição Cerrado – Amazônia, Brasil. Iheringia. Sér. Zool., 100, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silveira, M.P., Buss, D.F., Nessimian, J.L. and Baptista, D.F., 2006. Spatial and temporal distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates in a southeastern Brazilian River. Braz. J. Biol., 66, 623–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, H.M. de L., Juen, L. and Cabette, H.S.R., 2010. Diversidade beta de Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) em córregos da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Pindaíba/MT. In: Santos, J.E., Galbiati, C. and Moschini, L.E. (eds.), Gestão e educação ambiental: água, biodiversidade e cultura, RiMa, São Paulo, 109–123.Google Scholar
Souza, H.M. de L., Cabette, H.S.R. and Juen, L., 2011. Baetidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) em córregos do cerrado matogrossense sob diferentes níveis de preservação ambiental. Iheringia, Sér Zool, 101 (3): 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spies, M.R., Froehlich, C.G. and Kotzian, C.B., 2006. Composition and diversity of Trichoptera (Insecta) larvae communities in the middle section of the Jacuí river and some tributaries, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Iheringia, Sér. Zool., 96, 389–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strahler, H.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 33, 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Braak, C.J.F., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradients analysis. Ecology, 67, 1167–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utz, R.M., Hilderbrand, R.H. and Boward, D.M., 2009. Identifying regional differences in threshold responses of aquatic invertebrates to land cover gradients. Ecol. Indic., 9, 556–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, G.B., 1996. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera), University of Toronto Press Incorporated, Toronto, 457 p.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis (4th edn,), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York, 630 p.Google Scholar

OLM limn110074 - Trichoptera as bioindicator...

Appendix

Download OLM limn110074 - Trichoptera as bioindicator...(Audio)
Audio 43.9 KB