Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:06:26.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Man-made Mediterranean temporary ponds as a tool for amphibian conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2012

Albert Ruhí ,
Olatz San Sebastian ,
Carles Feo ,
Marc Franch ,
Stéphanie Gascón ,
Àlex Richter-Boix ,
Dani Boix  and
Gustavo Llorente
Albert Ruhí*
Affiliation:
Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
Olatz San Sebastian
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain Observatorio de Herpetología de Aranzadi, Donostia, Spain Fundació Emys, Riudarenes, Catalonia, Spain
Carles Feo
Affiliation:
Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain Museu Darder Espai d'interpretació de l'Estany, Banyoles, Catalonia, Spain
Marc Franch
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain Observatorio de Herpetología de Aranzadi, Donostia, Spain Fundació Emys, Riudarenes, Catalonia, Spain
Stéphanie Gascón
Affiliation:
Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
Àlex Richter-Boix
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain Department of Population Biology – Evolutionary Biology Centre, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
Dani Boix
Affiliation:
Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
Gustavo Llorente
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Mediterranean temporary ponds (MTPs) are crucial breeding sites for local amphibians, a faunal group in decline in the Mediterranean mainly due to wetland destruction. Although the disappearance of lentic habitats in other regions of the world has been ameliorated by the creation and restoration of wetlands, these tactics remain untested in Mediterranean wetlands. To evaluate the amphibian colonization dynamics of artificial MTPs in the north-eastern Iberian Peninsula, we monitored two artificial MTPs (one in a high-diversity area and the other in a low-diversity area) over 2 years. We selected reference wetlands at each area, and amphibian communities of man-made MTPs were compared to those of reference wetlands. We found that, beginning in the first year, artificial MTPs were a valuable habitat for regional amphibian fauna. Posteriorly, we focused on the reproductive success of the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Using a drift fence equipped with pit-fall traps, we measured the abundance of both reproductive adults entering the pond and post-metamorphic individuals exiting the pond. Using mark-recapture methods, we analyzed the time and energy costs associated with reproduction in the artificial MTPs. We observed a highly variable colonization dynamics between sites, between hydroperiods, and within hydroperiods, and these dynamics often depended on meteorological factors. Our results suggest that even at a short timescale, native amphibian species such as B. calamita can benefit from wetland creation in the Mediterranean region.

Keywords

Mediterranean temporary pondswetland creationconservationamphibiansBufo calamita
Type
Research Article
Information
Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , 2012 , pp. 81 - 93
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Álvarez, J. and Salvador, A., 1984. Cría de anuros en la laguna de Chozas de Arriba (León). Mediterranea, 7, 27–48.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Cobelas, M.A., Rojo, C. and Angeler, D.G., 2005. Mediterranean limnology: current status, gaps and the future. J. Limnol., 64, 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arak, A., 1988. Female mate selection in the natterjack toad: active choice or passive atraction? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 22, 317–327.Google Scholar
Baker, J.M.R. and Halliday, T.R., 1999. Amphibian colonization of new ponds in an agricultural landscape. Herpetolog. J., 9, 55–63.Google Scholar
Balcombe, C.K., Anderson, J.T., Fortney, R.H. and Kordek, W.S., 2005. Wildlife use of mitigation and reference wetlands in West Virginia. Ecol. Eng., 25, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, B. and Beebee, T.J.C., 1986. Climatic effects on calling and spawning of the Natterjack toad Bufo calamita: discriminant analyses and applications for conservation monitoring. Biol. Conserv., 36, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, D.S., Pauley, T.K. and Maerz, J.C., 2008. Amphibian use of man-made pools on clear-cuts in the Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia, USA. Appl. Herpetol., 5, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, T.J.C., 1997. Changes in dewpond numbers and amphibian diversity over 20 years on chalk downland in Sussex, England. Biol. Conserv., 81, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, T.J.C. and Griffiths, R.A., 2005. The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology? Biol. Conserv., 125, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beja, P. and Alcazar, R., 2003. Conservation of Mediterranean temporary ponds under agricultural intensification: an evaluation using amphibians. Biol. Conserv., 114, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beja, P., Kuzmin, S., Beebee, T., Denoël, M., Schmidt, B., Tarkhnishvili, D., Ananjeva, N., Orlov, N., Nyström, P., Ogrodowczyk, A., Ogielska, M., Bosch, J., Miaud, C., Tejedo, M., Lizana, M. and Martínez-Solano, I., 2009. Epidalea calamita. In: IUCN 2011. Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 24 January 2012.Google Scholar
Boix, D., Franch, M. and Mascort, R., 2004a. Els amfibis i rèptils del Baix Ter. In: Quintana, X.D. and Marí, M. (eds.), Els Aiguamolls del Baix Ter, Monografia dels Papers del Montgrí, Vol. 23: Papers del Montgrí, Torroella de Montgrí, Spain, 86–110.Google Scholar
Boix, D., Sala, J., Quintana, X.D. and Moreno-Amich, R., 2004b. Succession of the animal community in a Mediterranean temporary pond. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 23, 29–49.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, D., Sala, J. and Moreno-Amich, R., 2001. The faunal composition of Espolla pond (NE Iberian peninsula): the neglected biodiversity of temporary waters. Wetlands, 21, 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, J.J. and Arntzen, J.W., 1985. Abundance, growth and feeding of natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) in a 4-year-old artificial habitat. J. Appl. Ecol., 22, 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bragg, A.N., 1960. Population fluctuation in the amphibian fauna of Cleveland County, Oklahoma during the past twenty-five years. Southwest Nat., 5, 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, A.B. and Snodgrass, J.W., 2010. Value of artificial habitats for amphibian reproduction in altered landscapes. Conserv. Biol., 24, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooke, P.N., Alford, R.A. and Schwarzkopf, L., 2000. Environmental and social factors influence chorusing behaviour in a tropical frog: examining various temporal and spatial scales. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 49, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P.H. and Lant, C.L., 1999. The effect of wetland mitigation banking on the achievement of no-net-loss. Environ. Manage., 23, 333–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, K.R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol., 18, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comín, F.A.), 2010. Ecological Restoration. A Global Challenge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 318 p.Google Scholar
Cox, N.A., Chanson, J.S. and Stuart, S.N. (eds.), 2006. The Status and Distribution of Reptiles and Amphibians of the Mediterranean Basin, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, 42 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M., 2002. Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-Plus, Chichester, 772 p.Google Scholar
Cushman, S.A., 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol. Conserv., 128, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, J.S. and Beebee, T.C.J., 1993. Density-related features of Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) populations in Britain. J. Zool., 229, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, J.S., Hitchings, S.P., Beebee, T.J.C. and Gent, A., 1997. A recovery program for the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) in Britain. Conserv. Biol., 11, 1329–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Paniagua, C., Fernández-Zamudio, R., Florencio, M., García-Murillo, P., Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Portheault, A., Serrano, L. and Siljeström, P., 2010. Temporay ponds from Doñana National Park: a system of natural habitats for the preservation of aquatic flora and fauna. Limnetica, 29, 41–58.Google Scholar
Dodd, C.K., 1992. Biological diversity of a temporary pond herpetofauna in north Florida sandhills. Biodivers. Conserv., 1, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, M.A., Guyer, C., Juterbock, J.E. and Alford, R., 1994. Techniques for marking amphibians. In: Heyer, W.R., Donnelly, M.A., McDiarmid, R.W., Hayek, L.-A.C. and Foster, M.S. (eds.), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Amphibians, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, 277–284.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. and Lindenmayer, D.B., 2007. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 16, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Muñoz, E., Gilbert, J., Parra, G. and Guerrero, F., 2010. Wetlands classification for amphibian conservation in Mediterranean landscapes. Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 901–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-París, M., Montori, A. and Herrero, P. (eds.), 2004. Amphibia, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, 639 p.Google Scholar
Gascón, S., Boix, D., Sala, J. and Quintana, X.D., 2007. Changes on macrobenthic fauna of a mediterranean salt marsh (Empordà wetlands, NE iberian peninsula) after a severe drought, with special emphasis on the Corophium orientale population. Vie Milieu, 57, 10.Google Scholar
Gibbons, J.W., Winne, C.T., Scott, D.E., Willson, J.D., Glaudas, X., Andrews, K.M., Todd, B.D., Fedewa, L.A., Wilkinson, L., Tsaliagos, R.N., Harper, S.J., Greene, J.L., Tuberville, T.D., Metts, B.S., Dorcas, M.E., Nestor, J.P., Young, C.A., Akre, T., Reed, R.N., Buhlmann, K.A., Norman, J., Croshaw, D.A., Hagen, C. and Rothermel, B.B., 2006. Remarkable amphibian biomass and abundance in an isolated wetland: implications for wetland conservation. Conserv. Biol., 20, 1457–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K. and Ehrhardt, M., 1983. Methods of Seawater Analysis, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 419 p.Google Scholar
Grillas, P., Gauthier, P., Yavercovski, N. and Perennou, C. (eds.), 2004. Mediterranean Temporary Pools, Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles, 118 p.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, A., Guillamón, M., Lacorte, S., Tauler, R. and Barceló, D., 2008. Impact of pesticides used in agriculture and vineyards to surface and groundwater quality (North Spain). Water Res., 42, 3315–3326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlahan, J.E., Findlay, C.S., Schmidt, B.R., Meyer, A.H. and Kuzmin, S.L., 2000. Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature, 404, 752–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakob, C., Poizat, G., Veith, M., Seitz, A. and Crivelli, A.J., 2003. Breeding phenology and larval distribution of amphibians in a Mediterranean pond network with unpredictable hydrology. Hydrobiologia, 499, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, M., 1991. The ecology and conservation value of forestry ponds in Scotland, United Kingdom. Biol. Conserv., 58, 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joly, P. and Grolet, O., 1996. Colonization dynamics of new ponds, and the age structure of colonizing Alpine newts, Triturus alpestris. Acta Oecol., 17, 599–608.Google Scholar
Laan, R. and Verboom, B., 1990. Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biol. Conserv., 54, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacki, M., Hummer, J. and Webster, H., 1992. Mine-drainage treatment wetland as habitat for herptofaunal wildlife. Environ. Manage., 16, 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtinen, R.M. and Galatowitsch, S.M., 2001. Colonization of restored wetlands by amphibians in Minnesota. Am. Midl. Nat., 145, 388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtinen, R.M., Galatowitsch, S.M. and Tester, J., 1999. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands, 19, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesbarrères, D., Fowler, M.S., Pagano, A. and Lodé, T., 2010. Recovery of anuran community diversity following habitat replacement. J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Flores, R.O., Quintana, X.D., Salvadó, V., Hidalgo, M., Sala, L. and Moreno-Amich, R., 2003. Comparison of nutrient and contaminant fluxes in two areas with different hydrological regimes (Empordà Wetlands, NE Spain). Water Res., 37, 3034–3046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miaud, C., Sanuy, D. and Avrillier, J.-N., 2000. Terrestrial movements of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita (Amphibia, Anura) in a semi-arid, agricultural landscape. Amphib. Reptil., 21, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mierzwa, K.S., 2000. Wetland mitigation and amphibians: preliminary observations at a Southwestern Illinois bottomland hardwood forest restoration site. J. Iowa Acad. Sci., 107, 191–194.Google Scholar
Mitsch, W.J. and Wilson, R.F., 1996. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecol. Appl., 6, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montori, A., Llorente, G.A., Richter-Boix, A., Villero, D., Franch, M. and Garriga, N., 2007. Colonización y efectos potenciales de la especie invasora Discoglossus pictus sobre las especies nativas. Munibe, 25, 14–27.Google Scholar
Newman, R.A., 1998. Ecological constraints on amphibian metamorphosis: interactions of temperature and larval density with responses to changing food level. Oecologia, 115, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oertli, B., Auderset Joye, D., Castella, E., Juge, R., Cambin, D. and Lachavanne, J.-B., 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol. Conserv., 104, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oertli, B., Biggs, J., Céréghino, R., Grillas, P., Joly, P. and Lachavanne, J.-B., 2005. Conservation and monitoring of pond biodiversity: introduction. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 15, 535–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearman, P.B., Velasco, A.M. and López, A., 1995. Tropical amphibian monitoring: a comparison of methods for detecting inter-site variation in species’ composition. Herpetologica, 51, 325–337.Google Scholar
Pechmann, J., Estes, R., Scott, D. and Gibbons, J., 2001. Amphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland loss. Wetlands, 21, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzer, P., Lajmanovich, R., Attademo, A. and Beltzer, A., 2006. Diversity of anurans across agricultural ponds in argentina. Biodivers. Conserv., 15, 3499–3513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M.C., Sibrel, C.B. and Gough, G.A., 1996. Wetlands mitigation: partnership between an electric power company and a federal wildlife refuge. Environ. Manage., 20, 933–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petranka, J., Kennedy, C. and Murray, S., 2003. Response of amphibians to restoration of a southern Appalachian wetland: a long-term analysis of community dynamics. Wetlands, 23, 1030–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petranka, J.W., Harp, E.M., Holbrook, C.T. and Hamel, J.A., 2007. Long-term persistence of amphibian populations in a restored wetland complex. Biol. Conserv., 138, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pleguezuelos, J.M., Márquez, R. and Lizana, M., 2002. Atlas y libro rojo de los anfibios y reptiles de España, Dirección General de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Asociación Herpetológica Española, Madrid, 588 p.Google Scholar
Pough, F.H., Magnusson, W.E., Ryan, M.J., Wells, K.D. and Taigent, T.L., 1992. Energetics and locomotion: behavioral energetics. In: Feder, M.E. and Burggren, W.W. (eds.), Environmental Physiology of the Amphibians, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 395–436.Google Scholar
Rannap, R., Lõhmus, A. and Briggs, L., 2009. Restoring ponds for amphibians: a success story. Hydrobiologia, 634, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohr, J.R. and Crumrine, P.W., 2005. Effects of an herbicide and an insecticide on pond community structure and processes. Ecol. Appl., 15, 1135–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhí, A., Boix, D., Sala, J., Gascon, S. and Quintana, X.D., 2009. Spatial and temporal patterns of pioneer macrofauna in recently created ponds: taxonomic and functional approaches. Hydrobiologia, 634, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, J., Gascón, S., Boix, D., Gesti, J. and Quintana, X.D., 2004. Proposal of a rapid methodology to assess the conservation status of Mediterranean wetlands and its application in Catalunya. Arch. Sci., 57, 141–152.Google Scholar
Salvadó, V., Quintana, X. and Hidalgo, M., 2006. Monitoring of nutrients, pesticides, and metals in waters, sediments, and fish of a wetland. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 51, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shulse, C., Semlitsch, R., Trauth, K. and Williams, A., 2010. Influences of design and landscape placement parameters on amphibian abundance in constructed wetlands. Wetlands, 30, 915–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinsch, U., 1988. Temporal spacing of breeding activity in the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Oecologia, 76, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M.A. and Green, D.M., 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography, 28, 110–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, C., Diamond, A. and Gabor, T., 2002. Anuran call surveys on small wetlands in Prince Edward Island, Canada restored by dredging of sediments. Wetlands, 22, 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, S.N., Chanson, J.S., Cox, N.A., Young, B.E., Rodrigues, A.S.L., Fischman, D.L. and Waller, R.W., 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science, 306, 1783–1786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stumpel, A.H.P. and van der Voet, H., 1998. Characterizing the suitability of new ponds for amphibians. Amphib. Reptil., 19, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejedo, M. and Reques, R., 1994. Plasticity in metamorphic traits of natterjack tadpoles: the interactive effects of density and pond duration. Oikos, 71, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejedo, M. and Reques, R., 1997. Bufo calamita. In: Pleguezuelos, J.M. (ed.), Distribución y biogeografía de los anfibios y reptiles en España y Portugal, Asociación Herpetológica Española y Universidad de Granada, Granada, 155–157.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, D. and Calhoun, A., 2006. Monitoring created seasonal pools for functional success: a six-year case study of amphibian responses, Sears Island, Maine, USA. Wetlands, 26, 992–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wake, D.B. and Vredenburg, V.T., 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105, 11466–11473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zacharias, I., Dimitriou, E., Dekker, A. and Dorsman, E., 2007. Overview of temporary ponds in the Mediterranean region: threats, management and conservation issues. J. Environ. Biol., 28, 1–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Zedler, J.B. and Callaway, J.C., 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restor. Ecol., 7, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar