Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:48:28.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Chironomidae (Diptera) fauna of Greece: ecological distributions and patterns, taxalist and new records

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2014

Mateusz Płóciennik  and
Ioannis Karaouzas
Mateusz Płóciennik*
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Banacha st. 12/16, Lodz 90-237, Poland
Ioannis Karaouzas
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, 46.7 km Athens-Sounio Av., Anavissos 19013, Greece
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

For the first time, a faunistic list of the Chironomidae fauna of Greece is presented along with its ecological distribution. Chironomidae larvae and pupal exuviae were collected from 61 locations in mainland Greece during 2006–2008. 76 taxa (genera to species) were recorded. The genera Potthastia, Brillia, Euorthocladius, Synorthocladius, Tvetenia and Xenochironomus are recorded for the first time from Greece. Furthermore, 12 species are new for Greece and five are new for mainland Greece. Chironomidae collected from running waters were analysed with ordination techniques. The results revealed that Chironomidae assemblages were distinguished into three ecoregions with distinct climatic, geological and hydrochemical features. Running waters in Northwestern Greece were generally dominated by species tolerant to water acidification. Chironomids typical of eastern uplands preferred relatively slow current and soft bottom sediments. Assemblages of the southern Peloponnese Peninsula were represented by species of relatively fast flowing, warm streams. However, these are only preliminary results and many more data are needed to justify this ecological distinction of Chironomidae assemblages. This is the first study contributing to the knowledge of a rather neglected insect group of the Greek fauna. It is expected that more species remain to be identified and recorded and future works will contribute to this initial faunal list.

Keywords

ChironomidaeDipteraecogeographytaxalistnew recordsGreece
Type
Research Article
Information
Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , 2014 , pp. 19 - 34
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashe, P., Murray, D.A. and Reiss, F., 1987. The zoogeographical distribution of Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera). Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Lim., 23, 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AQEM Consortium, 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM method. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of Water Framework Directive. Version 1.0, February 2002.
Bick, H., 1963. A review of central European methods for the biological estimation of water pollution levels. Bull. World Health Org., 29, 401–413.Google ScholarPubMed
Brodersen, K.P. and Lindegaard, C., 1997. Significance of subfossile chironomid remains in classification of shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia, 342/343, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, S.J., Langdon, P.G. and Heiri, O., 2007. The Identification and use of Palaearctic Chironomidae Larvae in Palaeoecology, QRA Technical Guide No. 10, Quaternary Research Association, London, 276 p.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N., 2001. PRIMER v5: user manual. PRIMER-E, 91 p.
Illies, J., 1978. Limnofauna Europea, Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, 532 p.Google Scholar
Klink, A.G. and Moller Pillot, H.K.M., 2003. Chironomidae Larvae, Key to Higher Taxa and Species of the Lowlands of Northwestern Europe, ETI, Amsterdam, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Langton, P.H., 1984. A Key to Pupal Exuviae of West Palaearctic Chironomidae, Privately published by P.H. Langton, 3, St. Felix Road, Ramsey Forty Foot, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, 324 p.Google Scholar
Langton, P.H. and Visser, H., 2003. Chironomidae Exuviae. A Key to Pupal Exuviae of the West Palearctic Region, ETI, Amsterdam, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Laville, H. and Reiss, F., 1992. The chironomid fauna of the Mediterranean region reviewed. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol., 26, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malicky, H., 2005. Die Köcherfliegen Griechenlands, Denisia 17, Landes Museen, Linz, Austria, 240 p.Google Scholar
Margalef, D.R., 1958. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst., 3, 36–71.Google Scholar
Ministry for Development. 2003. Master Plan for the Management of Greek Water Resources, Directorate of Aquatic and Natural Resources, Athens (in Greek), 519 p.
Moller Pillot, H.K.M., 2009a. Chironomidae Larvae, Biology and Ecology of the Chironomini, KNNV Publishing, Zeist, 270 p.Google Scholar
Moller Pillot, H.K.M., 2009b. A key to the larvae of the aquatic Chironomidae of the North-West European Lowlands, private print, not published, 77 p.
Moller Pillot, H.K.M., 2013. Chironomidae Larvae, Volume 3: Biology and Ecology of the Aquatic Orthocladiinae. KNNV Publishing, Zeist, 312 p.
Mora, A. and Csabai, Z., 2008. First annotated checklist of Chironomidae of Rhodos, Greece (Insecta, Diptera). Spixiana, 31/2, 223–231.Google Scholar
Özkan, N. and Camur-Elipek, B. 2006. The dynamics of Chironomidae larvae (Diptera) and the water quality in Meric River (Edirne/Turkey). Tiscia, 35, 49–54.Google Scholar
Özkan, N., Moubayed-Breil, J. and Camur-Elipek, B. 2010. Ecological analysis of Chironomid larvae (Diptera, Chironomidae) in Ergene river basin (Turkish Thrace). Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 10, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paunović, M., Tubić, B., Kračun, M., Marković, V., Simić, V., Zorić, K. and Atanacković, A., 2012. Ecoregions delineation for the territory of Serbia. Water Res. Manage., 2, 65–74.Google Scholar
Petridis, D. and Sinis, A., 1993. Benthic macrofauna of Tavropos Reservoir (central Greece). Hydrobiologia, 202, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petridis, D. and Sinis, A., 1995. Benthos of Lake Mikri Prespa (North Greece). Hydrobiologia, 304, 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, F., 1977. Verbreitungsmuster bei palaearktischen Chironomidenarten (Diptera, Chironomidae). Spixiana, 1, 85–97.Google Scholar
Sæther, O.A. and Spies, M., 2013. Fauna Europaea: Chironomidae. In: Beuk, P. and Pape, T. (eds.), Fauna Europaea: Diptera Nematocera. Fauna Europaea version 2.6. http://www.faunaeur.org.Google Scholar
Skoulikidis, N.Th., Bertahas, I. and Koussouris, T., 1998. The environmental state of freshwater resources in Greece (rivers and lakes). Environ. Geol., 36, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoulikidis, N.Th., Amaxidis, Y., Bertahas, I., Laschou, S. and Gritzalis, K., 2006. Analysis of factors driving stream water composition and synthesis of management tools – a case study on small/medium Greek catchments. Sci. Total Environ., 362, 205–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skoulikidis, N.Th., Karaouzas, I. and Gritzalis, K.C. 2009. Identifying key environmental variables structuring benthic fauna for establishing a biotic typology for Greek running waters. Limnologica, 39, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallenduuk, H.J. and Moller Pillot, H.K.M., 2007. Chironomidae Larvae of the Netherlands and Adjacent Lowlands. General Ecology and Tanypodinae, KNNV Publishing, Zeist, 143 p.Google Scholar
Wiederholm, T., 1983. Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses. Part 1. Larvae. Entomol. Scand. Suppl., 19, Lund, 457 p.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.S. and Ruse, L.P., 2005. A guide to the identification of genera of chironomid pupal exuviae occurring in Britain and Ireland (including common genera from northern Europe) and their use in monitoring lotic and lentic fresh waters. The Freshwater Biological Association. The Ferry House, Far Sawrey, Ambleside, Cumbria, UK, 176 p.
Yunakov, N. and Germann, C., 2012. Brachysomus (Hippomias) samos sp. n. from Greece – first island endemism in the genus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae). Zootaxa, 3408, 59–68.Google Scholar