Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:19:41.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trajectories of evolution and drivers of change in European mountain cattle farming systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

A. García-Martínez ,
A. Olaizola  and
A. Bernués
A. García-Martínez
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain Centro Universitario Temascaltepec, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México
A. Olaizola
Affiliation:
Departamento de Agricultura y Economía Agraria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
A. Bernués*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In the last few decades, significant changes in livestock farming systems and land use were observed in European mountain areas with large implications for the sustainability of grazing agro-ecosystems. System dynamic studies become essential to understand these changes, identify the drivers involved and trying to anticipate what might happen in the future. The objectives of this study were as follows: (i) to analyse the main recent changes that occurred in mountain cattle farming in the Spanish Pyrenees; (ii) to typify diverse trajectories of evolution of these systems; and (iii) to establish drivers of change that might help understand the evolution of mountain agriculture. A constant sample of mountain cattle farms was analysed for the period 1990 to 2004. In total, 30% of farms have disappeared during this time interval. For the remaining farms, the most important general changes observed were as follows: increment of size; change of productive orientation from mixed beef-dairy to pure beef production; extensification of grazing management; reduction of family labour and increase of pluriactivity; reduction of unitary variable costs; and increase of labour productivity. After the elimination of common temporal effects between dates, multivariate techniques allowed for the identification of three patterns and six specific trajectories of evolution that are profiled in the text. Relationships between the patterns of evolution and other variables referring the farm, the household and the socio-economic environment were identified as drivers of change: (i) the specific location of the farm in relation to the capital village of the municipality and the evolution other sectors of the economy, in particular tourism; (ii) the size of the family labour, presence of successors and degree of dynamism of the farmer; and (iii) the initial orientation of production.

Keywords

farm dynamicsextensificationabandonmentsocio-economic environmentmountain agriculture
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 152 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldanondo, AM, Casanovas, O, Almansa, C 2007. Explaining farm succession: the impact of farm location and off-farm employment opportunities. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 214–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernués A 1994. Economía de la sanidad animal en áreas de montaña: interrelaciones entre los sistemas de explotación de vacuno y evaluación económica de programas sanitarios. PhD, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.Google Scholar
Bernués, A, Olaizola, A, Corcoran, K 2003. Extrinsic attributes of red meat as indicators of quality in Europe: an application for market segmentation. Food Quality and Preference 14, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernués, A, Riedel, JL, Asensio, MA, Blanco, M, Sanz, A, Revilla, R, Casasús, I 2005. An integrated approach to studying the role of grazing livestock systems in the conservation of rangelands in a protected natural park (Sierra de Guara, Spain). Livestock Production Science 96, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryden, J 1994. Interactions between farm household and the rural community: effects of non-agricultural elements in farm household decision making on farming systems. In Rural and farming system analysis: European perspectives (ed. JB Dent and MJ Mac Gregor), pp. 243–254. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Casasús, I, Bernués, A, Sanz, A, Villalba, D, Riedel, JL, Revilla, R 2007. Vegetation dynamics in Mediterranean forest pastures as affected by beef cattle grazing. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121, 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsi A 2006. Which Italian family farms will have a successor? Poster Paper presented at the 26th Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, Gold Coast, Australia, 12–18 August 2006, p. 16.Google Scholar
Dolédec, S, Chessel, D 1987. Seasonal successions and spatial variables in fresh-water environments. 1. Description of a complete two-way layout by projection of variables. Acta Oecologica-Oecologia Generalis 8, 403–426.Google Scholar
Flamant, JC, Béranger, C, Gibon, A 1999. Animal production and land use sustainability: an approach from the farm diversity at territory level. Livestock Production Science 61, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasson, R, Errington, A 1993. Objectives, goals and values in the family farm. In The farm family business (ed. R Gasson and A Errington), pp. 88–112. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Gellrich, M, Baur, P, Koch, B, Zimmermann, NE 2007. Agricultural land abandonment and natural forest re-growth in the Swiss mountains: a spatially explicit economic analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geoghegan, J, Wainger, LA, Bockstael, NE 1997. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics 23, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibon, A 2005. Managing grassland for production, the environment and the landscape. Challenges at the farm and the landscape level. Livestock Production Science 96, 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibon, A, Balent, G, Olaizola, A, Di Pietro, F 1999. Approache des variations communales des dynamiques rurales au moyen d′une typologie: cas du versant nord des Pyrénées Centrales. Options Méditerranéennes B27, 15–34.Google Scholar
Hair, JFJ, Black, WC, Babin, BJ, Anderson, RE, Tatham, RL 2006. Multivariate data analysis, 6th edition. Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
Köbrich, C, Rehman, T, Khan, M 2003. Typification of farming systems for constructing representative farm models: two illustrations of the application of multi-variate analyses in Chile and Pakistan. Agricultural Systems 76, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambin, EF, Turner, BL, Geist, HJ, Agbola, SB, Angelsen, A, Bruce, JW, Coomes, OT, Dirzo, R, Fischer, G, Folke, C, George, PS, Homewood, K, Imbernon, J, Leemans, R, Li, X, Moran, EF, Mortimore, M, Ramakrishnan, PS, Richards, JF, Skånes, H, Steffen, W, Stone, GD, Svedin, U, Veldkamp, TA, Vogel, C, Xu, J 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 11, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landais, E 1996. Typologies d’exploitations agricoles. Nouvelles questions, nouvelles méthodes. Économie Rurale 236, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasanta-Martínez, T, Vicente-Serrano, SM, Cuadrat-Prats, JM 2005. Mountain Mediterranean landscape evolution caused by the abandonment of traditional primary activities: a study of the Spanish Central Pyrenees. Applied Geography 25, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasanta-Martínez, T, Laguna, M, Vicente-Serrano, SM 2007. Do tourism-based ski resorts contribute to the homogeneous development of the Mediterranean mountains? A case study in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Tourism Management 28, 1326–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, C, Maxime, F, Mazé, A, Tichit, M 2003. Multifunctionality of agriculture and farm models. Économie Rurale 273/274, 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manrique, E, Olaizola, A, Bernués, A, Maza, MT, Saez, A 1999. Economic diversity of farming systems and possibilities of structural adjustment in mountain livestock farms. Options Méditerranéennes B27, 81–94.Google Scholar
Marin-Yaseli, ML, Lasanta-Martínez, T 2003. Competing for meadows – a case study on tourism and livestock farming in the Spanish Pyrenees. Mountain Research and Development 23, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, D, Cabtree, JR, Wiesinger, G, Dax, T, Stamou, N, Fleury, P, Gutierrez, JL, Gibon, A 2000. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management 59, 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mottet, A, Ladet, S, Coqué, N, Gibon, A 2006. Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: a case study in the Pyrenees. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114, 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olaizola A 1991. Viabilidad económica de sistemas ganaderos de montaña en condiciones de competencia en el uso de factores productivos. Análisis de la ganadería en un Valle Pirenaico característico mediante técnicas multivariantes y de optimización. PhD, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.Google Scholar
Olaizola, A, Manrique, E, Bernués, A, Maza, MT 1996. Incidence of programmes to discourage milk production on representative cattle farms in a less favoured area. Investigación Agraria: Economía 11, 355–376.Google Scholar
Rasul, G, Thapa, GB, Zoebisch, MA 2004. Determinants of land-use changes in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. Applied Geography 24, 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedel, JL, Casasús, I, Bernués, A 2007. Sheep farming intensification and utilization of natural resources in a Mediterranean pastoral agro-ecosystem. Livestock Science 111, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruben, R, Pender, J 2004. Rural diversity and heterogeneity in less-favoured areas: the quest for policy targeting. Food Policy 29, 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, C 2003. Gender role flexibility and smallholder survival. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 2, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, E, Giráldez, FJ, Lavín, P, Bernués, A, Ruiz-Mantecón, A 2004. The identification of homogeneous groups of cattle farms in the mountains of León, Spain. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2, 512–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strijker, D 2005. Marginal lands in Europe – causes of decline. Basic and Applied Ecology 6, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teruel, A, Bernués, A, Caudevilla, A 1995. The evolution of the tourism and livestock sectors in the Pyrennean region of Jacetania. In Animal production and rural tourism in Mediterranean regions (ed. JC Flamant, J Boyazoglu and A Nardone), EAAP Scientific Series 74, pp. 265–269. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Tirel, JC 1991. L′extensification: chance ou défi pour les exploitations agricoles. INRA Productions Animales 4, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veysset, P, Bebin, D, Lherm, M 2005a. Adaptation to Agenda 2000 (CAP reform) and optimisation of the farming system of French suckler cattle farms in the Charolais area: a model-based study. Agricultural Systems 83, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veysset, P, Lherm, M, Bebin, D 2005b. Évolutions, dispersions et déterminants du revenu en élevage bovin allaitant charolais. Étude sur 15 ans (1989–2003) à partir d’un échantillon constant de 69 exploitations. INRA Productions Animales 18, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar