Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:00:06.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Total mixed ration pellets for light fattening lambs: effects on animal health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2014

C. Blanco ,
F. J. Giráldez ,
N. Prieto ,
J. Benavides ,
S. Wattegedera ,
L. Morán ,
S. Andrés  and
R. Bodas
C. Blanco
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), E-24346 Grulleros, León, Spain
F. J. Giráldez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), E-24346 Grulleros, León, Spain
N. Prieto
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), E-24346 Grulleros, León, Spain
J. Benavides
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), E-24346 Grulleros, León, Spain
S. Wattegedera
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, Bush Loan, Penicuik, Midlothian, Scotland EH26 0PZ, UK
L. Morán
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), E-24346 Grulleros, León, Spain
S. Andrés
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), E-24346 Grulleros, León, Spain
R. Bodas*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), E-24346 Grulleros, León, Spain
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Fifty male Merino lambs (6 to 8 weeks, 14.1 kg; n=10 per group) were used to study the effect of feeding system: barley straw in long form and concentrate pellets in separate troughs (Control), ad libitum alfalfa supplemented with concentrate in separate troughs (Alfalfa) or including various levels of ground barley straw in concentrate pellets (B05, B15 and B25 for 50, 150 and 250 g barley straw/kg), on rumen characteristics, acid-base status, blood cell counts and lymphocyte stimulation. Alfalfa lambs had the heaviest digestive tract contents, highest rumen pH values, lowest volatile fatty acid concentration, highest papillae counts and best mucosa colour and the greatest blood pCO2 values, lowest sodium and chloride and highest potassium concentrations (P<0.05). Including ground barley straw in the concentrate pellet or providing straw in long form separately from the concentrate reduces rumen pH and darkens ruminal mucosa as compared with alfalfa-fed lambs, thus affecting acid-base status.

Keywords

rumenhaematologyconcentrateacidosissheep
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , February 2015 , pp. 258 - 266
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, MS 1997. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1447–1462.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Rodríguez, J, Sanz, A, Ripoll-Bosch, R and Joy, M 2010. Do alfalfa grazing and lactation length affect the digestive tract fill of light lambs? Small Ruminant Research 94, 109–116.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Rodríguez, J, Monleón, E, Sanz, A, Badiola, JJ and Joy, M 2012. Rumen fermentation and histology in light lambs as affected by forage supply and lactation length. Reseach Veterinary Science 92, 247–253.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2003. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Baldwin, RL 1999. Sheep gastrointestinal development in response to different dietary treatments. Small Ruminant Research 35, 39–47.Google Scholar
Baldwin, RL, El-Kadi, SW, McLeod, KR, Connor, EE and Bequette, BJ 2007. Intestinal and ruminal epithelial and hepatic metabolism regulatory gene expression as affected by forage to concentrate ratio in bulls. In Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition, EAAP Publication no 124 (ed. I Ortigues-Marty, N Miraux and W Brand-Williams), pp. 293–294. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Benavides, J, Martínez-Valladares, M, Tejido, ML, Giráldez, FJ, Bodas, R, Prieto, N, Pérez, V and Andrés, S 2013. Quercitin and flaxseed included in the diet of fattening lambs: effects on immune response, stress during road transport and ruminal acidosis. Livestock Science 158 (1–3), 84–90.Google Scholar
Blanco, C, Bodas, R, Prieto, N, Andrés, S, López, S and Giráldez, FJ 2014. Concentrate plus ground barley straw pellets can replace conventional feeding systems for light fattening lambs. Small Ruminant Research 116, 137–143.Google Scholar
Bodas, R, Giráldez, FJ, López, S, Rodríguez, AB and Mantecón, AR 2007. Inclusion of sugar beet pulp in cereal-based diets for fattening lambs. Small Ruminant Research 71, 250–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brossard, L, Martin, C and Michalet-Doreau, B 2003. Ruminal fermentative parameters and blood acido-basic balance changes during the onset and recovery of induced latent acidosis in sheep. Animal Research 52, 513–530.Google Scholar
Carrasco, S, Panea, B, Ripoll, G, Sanz, A and Joy, M 2009a. Influence of feeding systems on cortisol levels, fat colour and instrumental meat quality in light lambs. Meat Science 83, 50–56.Google Scholar
Carrasco, S, Ripoll, G, Sanz, A, Álvarez-Rodríguez, J, Panea, B, Revilla, R and Joy, M 2009b. Effect of feeding system on growth and carcass characteristics of Churra Tensina light lambs. Livestock Science 121, 56–63.Google Scholar
Carro, MD, Valdés, C, Ranilla, MJ and González, JS 2000. Effect of forage to concentrate ratio in the diet on ruminal fermentation and digesta flow kinetics in sheep offered food at a fixed and restricted level of intake. Animal Science 70, 127–134.Google Scholar
Ceroni, V, Turmalaj, L, Lika, E and Duro, S 2012. Haematological indicators affected by the subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 11, 927–930.Google Scholar
Commun, L, Mialon, MM, Martin, C, Baumont, R and Veissier, I 2009. Risk of subacute ruminal acidosis in sheep with separate access to forage and concentrate. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3372–3379.Google Scholar
Danscher, AM, Thoefner, MB, Heegaard, PMH, Ekstrøm, CT and Jacobsen, S 2011. Acute phase protein response during acute ruminal acidosis in cattle. Livestock Science 135, 62–69.Google Scholar
De Blas, C, Mateos, GG and García-Rebollar, P 2010. Tablas FEDNA de composición y valor nutritivo de alimentos para la fabricación de piensos compuestos, 3rd edition. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Emmett, M and Narins, RG 1977. Clinical use of the anion gap. Medicine 56, 38–54.Google Scholar
Enemark, J 2008. The monitoring, prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA): a review. The Veterinary Journal 176, 32–43.Google Scholar
Enemark, JMD, Jorgensen, RJ and Enemark, PS 2002. Rumen acidosis with special emphasis on diagnostic aspects of subclinical rumen acidosis: a review. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika 20, 16–29.Google Scholar
Farwell, WR and Taylor, EN 2010. Serum anion gap, bicarbonate and biomarkers of inflammation in healthy individuals in a national survey. Canadian Medical Association Journal 182, 137–141.Google Scholar
Giger-Reverdin, S, Duvaux-Ponter, C, Sauvant, D, Martin, O, Nunes do Prado, I and Müller, R 2002. Intrinsic buffering capacity of feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 96, 83–102.Google Scholar
Ha, JK, Emerick, RJ and Embry, LB 1983. In vitro effect of pH variations on rumen fermentation, and in vivo effects of buffers in lambs before and after adaptation to high concentrate diets. Journal of Animal Science 56, 698–706.Google Scholar
Hope, JC, Kwong, LS, Thom, M, Sopp, P, Mwangi, W, Brown, WC, Palmer, GH, Wattegedera, S, Entrican, G and Howard, CJ 2005. Development of detection methods for ruminant interleukin (IL)-4. Journal of Immunology Methods 301, 114–123.Google Scholar
Joy, M, Ripoll, G and Delfa, R 2008. Effects of feeding system on carcass and non-carcass composition of Churra Tensina light lambs. Small Ruminant Research 78, 123–133.Google Scholar
Kellum, JA, Song, M and Li, J 2004. Science review: extracellular acidosis and the immune response: clinical and physiologic implications. Critical Care 8, 331–336.Google Scholar
Kleen, JL, Hooijer, GA, Rehage, J and Noordhuizen, JPTM 2003. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA): a review. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A 50, 406–414.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, CR, Britton, RA, Harmon, DL, Wester, TJ and Stock, RA 1995. The effects of ruminal acidosis on volatile fatty acid absorption and plasma activities of pancreatic enzymes in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3111–3121.Google Scholar
Kume, S, Toharmat, T, Ridla, M, Nonaka, K, Oshita, T, Nakamura, M, Yamada, Y and Ternouth, J 2004. Effects of high potassium intake from alfalfa silage on mineral status in sheep and periparturient cows. Research Bulletin of the National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region 181, 1–14.Google Scholar
Mirzaei-Aghsaghali, A, Maheri-Sis, N, Mirza-Aghazadeh, A, Safaei, AR and Aghajanzadeh-Golshani, A 2008. Nutritional value of alfalfa varieties for ruminants with emphasis on different measuring methods: a review. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 3, 1227–1241.Google Scholar
Ndlovu, LR and Buchanan-Smith, JG 1985. Utilization of poor quality roughages by sheep: effects of alfalfa supplementation on ruminal parameters, fiber digestion and rate of passage from the rumen. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 65, 693–703.Google Scholar
Odongo, NE, AlZahal, O, Lindinger, MI, Duffield, TF, Valdes, EV, Terrell, SP and McBride, BW 2006. Effects of mild heat stress and grain challenge on acid-base balance and rumen tissue histology in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 447–455.Google Scholar
Owens, FN, Secrist, DS, Hill, WJ and Gill, DR 1998. Acidosis in cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 76, 275–286.Google Scholar
Papi, N, Mostafa-Tehrani, A, Amanlou, H and Memarian, M 2011. Effects of dietary forage-to-concentrate ratios on performance and carcass characteristics of growing fat-tailed lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 163, 93–98.Google Scholar
Penner, GA, Steele, MA, Aschenbach, JR and McBride, BW 2011. Ruminant Nutrition Symposium: molecular adaptation of ruminal epithelia to highly fermentable diets. Journal of Animal Science 89, 1108–1119.Google Scholar
Plaizier, JC, Khafipour, E, Li, S, Gozho, GN and Krause, DO 2012. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA), endotoxins and health consequences. Animal Feed Science and Technology 172, 9–21.Google Scholar
Poore, MH, Moore, JA and Swingle, RS 1990. Differential passage rates and digestion of neutral detergent fiber from grain and forages in 30, 60 and 90% concentrate diets fed to steers. Journal of Animal Science 68, 2965–2973.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, AB, Bodas, R, Prieto, N, Landa, R, Mantecón, AR and Giráldez, FJ 2008. Effect of sex and feeding system on feed intake, growth, and meat and carcass characteristics of fattening Assaf lambs. Livestock Science 116, 118–125.Google Scholar
Steele, MA, AlZahal, O, Hook, SE, Croom, J and McBride, BW 2009. Ruminal acidosis and the rapid onset of ruminal parakeratosis in a mature dairy cow: a case report. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 51, 39–44.Google Scholar
Steele, MA, Croom, J, Kahler, M, AlZahal, O, Hook, SE, Plaizier, K and McBride, BW 2011. Bovine rumen epithelium undergoes rapid structural adaptations during grain-induced subacute ruminal acidosis. American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 300, R1515–R1523.Google Scholar
Tufarelli, V, Khan, RU and Laudadio, V 2011. Feeding of wheat middlings in lamb total mixed rations: effects on growth performance and carcass traits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 170, 130–135.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Zhao, XH, Zhan, T, Xu, M and Yao, JH 2011. Effects of physically effective fiber on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and digestibility in goats. Journal of Animal Science 89, 501–509.Google Scholar