Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:36:14.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil intake of lactating dairy cows in intensive strip grazing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2012

S. Jurjanz ,
C. Feidt ,
L. A. Pérez-Prieto ,
H. M. N. Ribeiro Filho ,
G. Rychen  and
R. Delagarde
S. Jurjanz*
Affiliation:
UR Animal et Fonctionnalités des Produits Animaux, INRA Nancy Université, 2 av. de la forêt de Haye, BP 172, 54505 Vandoeuvre cedex, France
C. Feidt
Affiliation:
UR Animal et Fonctionnalités des Produits Animaux, INRA Nancy Université, 2 av. de la forêt de Haye, BP 172, 54505 Vandoeuvre cedex, France
L. A. Pérez-Prieto
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1080 INRA-Agrocampus Ouest, Production du Lait, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
H. M. N. Ribeiro Filho
Affiliation:
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Av. Luiz de Camões, 2090 CEP 88520-000, Lages, SC, Brazil
G. Rychen
Affiliation:
UR Animal et Fonctionnalités des Produits Animaux, INRA Nancy Université, 2 av. de la forêt de Haye, BP 172, 54505 Vandoeuvre cedex, France
R. Delagarde
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1080 INRA-Agrocampus Ouest, Production du Lait, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Involuntary soil intake by cows on pasture can be a potential route of entry for pollutants into the food chain. Therefore, it appears necessary to know and quantify factors affecting soil intake in order to ensure the food safety in outside rearing systems. Thus, soil intake was determined in two Latin square trials with 24 and 12 lactating dairy cows. In Trial 1, the effect of pasture allowance (20 v. 35 kg dry matter (DM) above ground level/cow daily) was studied for two sward types (pure perennial ryegrass v. mixed perennial ryegrass–white clover) in spring. In Trial 2, the effect of pasture allowance (40 v. 65 kg DM above ground level/cow daily) was studied at two supplementation levels (0 or 8 kg DM of a maize silage-based supplement) in autumn. Soil intake was determined by the method based on acid-insoluble ash used as an internal marker. The daily dry soil intake ranged, between treatments, from 0.17 to 0.83 kg per cow in Trial 1 and from 0.15 to 0.85 kg per cow in Trial 2, reaching up to 1.3 kg during some periods. In both trials, soil intake increased with decreasing pasture allowance, by 0.46 and 0.15 kg in Trials 1 and 2, respectively. In Trial 1, this pasture allowance effect was greater on mixed swards than on pure ryegrass swards (0.66 v. 0.26 kg reduction of daily soil intake between medium and low pasture allowance, respectively). In Trial 2, the pasture allowance effect was similar at both supplementation levels. In Trial 2, supplemented cows ate much less soil than unsupplemented cows (0.20 v. 0.75 kg/day, respectively). Differences in soil intake between trials and treatments can be related to grazing conditions, particularly pre-grazing and post-grazing sward height, determining at least in part the time spent grazing close to the ground. A post-grazing sward height lower than 50 mm can be considered as a critical threshold. Finally, a dietary supplement and a low grazing pressure, that is, high pasture allowance increasing post-grazing sward height, would efficiently limit the risk for high level of soil intake, especially when grazing conditions are difficult. Pre-grazing and post-grazing sward heights, as well as faecal crude ash concentration appear to be simple and practical tools for evaluating the risk for critical soil intake in grazing dairy cows.

Keywords

soil intakedairy cowgrazingsupplementationpasture allowance
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 8 , August 2012 , pp. 1350 - 1359
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, PW, Steigmajer, J 2003. Soil ingestion by sheep grazing the metal enriched floodplain soils of Mid-Wales. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 25, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association Française de Normalisation 1992. Qualité des sols – Echantillonnage – Méthode de prélèvement d’échantillons de sol – NF X31-100. AFNOR Editions, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France.Google Scholar
Association Française de Normalisation 1997. Aliments des animaux – Dosage des cendres brutes – NF V18 – 101. AFNOR Editions, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France.Google Scholar
Allard, JH 2009. Pollution aux PCB à St Cyprien. Le Progrès – Loire (St Etienne), 26 May.Google Scholar
Aufrère, J, Michalet-Doreau, B 1988. Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresford, NA, Howard, BJ 1991. The importance of soil adhered to vegetation as a source of radionuclides ingested by grazing animals. The Science of the Total Environment 107, 237–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyer, NW, Connor, EE, Gerould, S 1994. Estimates of soil ingestion by wildlife. Journal of Wildlife Management 58, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, NW, Spann, J, Day, D 1999. Metal and sediment ingestion by dabbling ducks. The Science of the Total Environment 231, 235–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crout, NMJ, Beresford, NA, Howard, BJ 1993. Does soil adhesion matter when predicting radiocaesium transfer to animals? Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 20, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delagarde, R, Faverdin, P, Baratte, C, Peyraud, JL 2011. GrazeIn: a model of herbage intake and milk production for grazing dairy cows. 2. Prediction of intake under rotational and continuously stocked grazing management. Grass and Forage Science 66, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, BH, Emerick, RJ, Embry, LB 1979. Sodium bentonite and sodium bicarbonate in high-concentrate diets for lambs and steers. Journal of Animal Science 48, 764–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, GF, Marrow, GS, Snow, PA 1982. Soil ingestion by dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 65, 611–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, WB 1968. Ingestion of soil by dairy cows. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, WB, Ludwig, TG 1965. Wear of sheep's teeth. The role of ingested soil. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 737–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, WB, Cutress, TW, Michie, C 1967. Wear of sheep's teeth. Reduction of soil ingestion and tooth wear by supplementary feed. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurjanz, S, Germain, K, Juin, H, Jondreville, C 2011. Ingestion de sol et de végétaux par le poulet de chair sur des parcours enherbés ou arborés. In Proceedings of the 9th Biannual Meeting of the World Poultry Association, 29–30 March 2011, Tours, France, p. 53.Google Scholar
Kreulen, DA, Jager, T 1984. The significance of soil ingestion in the utilization of arid rangelands by large herbivores, with special references to natural licks on the Kalahari pans. In Herbivore nutrition in the subtropics and tropics (eds RI MacKie and FMC Gilchrist), pp. 204–221. Science Press, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Mamontova, EA, Tarascova, EN, Mamontov, AA, Kuzmin, MI, McLachlan, MS, Khomutova, MI 2007. The influence of soil contamination on the concentration of PCBs in milk in Siberia. Chemosphere 67, S71–S78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manz, M, Wenzel, KD, Dietze, U, Schüürmann, G 2001. Persistent organic pollutants in agricultural soils of Central Germany. The Science of the Total Environment 277, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayland, HF, Florence, AR, Rosenau, RC, Lazar, VA, Turner, HA 1975. Soil ingestion by cattle on semiarid range as reflected by titanium analysis of feed. Journal of Range Management 28, 448–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouachem, D, Nouicer, F 2006. L'argile, source biologique améliorant le métabolisme du rumen. Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants 13, 113.Google Scholar
Penning, PD 2004. Animal based techniques for estimating herbage intake. In Herbage intake handbook (ed PD Penning), pp. 53–93. British Grassland Society, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
Pérez-Prieto, LA, Peyraud, JL, Delagarde, R 2011. Substitution rate and milk response to corn silage supplementation of late lactating dairy cows grazing low mass pasture at two daily allowances in autumn. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3592–3604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Ramírez, E, Peyraud, JL, Delagarde, R 2012. N-alkanes v. ytterbium/faecal index as two methods for estimating herbage intake of dairy cows fed on diets differing in the herbage:maize silage ratio and feeding level. Animal 6, 232–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro Filho, HMN, Delagarde, R, Peyraud, JL 2005. Herbage intake and milk yield of dairy cows grazing perennial ryegrass swards at low- and medium herbage allowances. Animal Feed Science and Technology 119, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute 2004. Statistical analysis systems, version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Thébault, A 2005. Analyse des déterminants de la contamination en dioxines et furanes (PCB non compris) des œufs issus d’élevage de volailles en plein-air des particuliers. Note technique AFSSA, AQR/ATH2005-203. AFSSA, Maisons-Alfort, France.Google Scholar
Thornton, I, Kinniburgh, D 1978. Intake of lead, copper and zinc by cattle from soil and pasture. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Trace Element Metabolism in Man and Animals (ed. M. Kirchgessner), p. 499. Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.Google Scholar
Thornton, I, Abrahams, P 1983. Soil ingestion – a major pathway of heavy metals into livestock grazing contaminated land. The Science of the Total Environment 28, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Keulen, J, Young, BA 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestion studies. Journal of Animal Science 44, 282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar