Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:41:08.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Severe feed restriction increases permeability of mammary gland cell tight junctions and reduces ethanol stability of milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2013

M. T. Stumpf*
Affiliation:
Departmento de Pós Graduação em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, 91540-000 Porto Alegre, Brazil
V. Fischer
Affiliation:
Departmento de Pós Graduação em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, 91540-000 Porto Alegre, Brazil
C. M. McManus
Affiliation:
Departmento de Pós Graduação em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, 91540-000 Porto Alegre, Brazil
G. J. Kolling
Affiliation:
Departmento de Pós Graduação em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, 91540-000 Porto Alegre, Brazil
M. B. Zanela
Affiliation:
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa), Rodovia BR 392, Km 78, 96010-971 Pelotas, Brazil
C. S. Santos
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Agronomia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rua Gomes Carneiro, 1, 96010-610, Pelotas, Brazil
A. S. Abreu
Affiliation:
Departmento de Pós Graduação em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, 91540-000 Porto Alegre, Brazil
P. Montagner
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Centro de Biotecnologia/Campus Universitário s/n, 96010-900 Pelotas, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

A total of twelve lactating Jersey cows were used in a 5-week experiment to determine the effects of severe feed restriction on the permeability of mammary gland cell tight junctions (TJs) and its effects on milk stability to the alcohol test. During the first 2 weeks, cows were managed and fed together and received the same diet according to their nutritional requirements (full diet: 15 kg of sugar cane silage; 5.8 kg of alfalfa hay; 0.16 kg of mineral salt and 6.2 kg of concentrate). In the 3rd week, animals were distributed into two groups of six cows each. One group received the full diet and the other a restricted diet (50% of the full diet). In the 4th and 5th weeks, all animals received the full diet again. Milk composition and other attributes, such as titratable acidity, ethanol stability, pH, density and somatic cell count (SCC) were evaluated. Cortisol levels indicated the stress condition of the cows. Plasma lactose and milk sodium were measured to assess mammary TJ leakiness. Principal factor analysis (PFA) showed that the first two principal factors (PFs) contributed with 44.47% and 20.57% of the total variance in the experiment and, as feeding levels increased, milk stability to the ethanol test became higher and plasma lactose levels decreased, which indicates lower permeability of the mammary gland cell TJ. Correspondence analyses were consistent with PFA and also showed that lower feeding levels were related to reduced milk stability, high plasma lactose, high sodium in milk, low milk lactose (another parameter used to assess TJ permeability) and higher cortisol levels, indicating the stress to which animals were submitted. All observations were grouped in three clusters, with some of the above-mentioned patterns. Feeding restriction was associated with higher permeability of TJ, decreasing milk stability to the ethanol test.

Type
Physiology and functional biology of systems
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boumpa, T, Tsioulpas, A, Grandison, AS, Lewis, MJ 2008. Effects of phosphates and citrates on sediment formation in UHT goats’ milk. Journal of Dairy Research 75, 160166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chavez, MS, Negri, LM, Cuatrín, A 2004. Bovine milk composition parameters affecting the ethanol stability. Journal of Dairy Research 71, 20012006.Google Scholar
Fleet, IR, Peaker, M 1978. Mammary function and its control at the cessation of lactation in the goat. Journal of Physiology 279, 491507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guinard-Flament, J, Delamaire, E, Lamberton, P, Peyraud, JL 2007. Adaptations of mammary uptake and nutrient use to once-daily milking and feed restriction in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 50625072.Google Scholar
Horne, DS, Parker, TG 1981. Factors affecting the ethanol stability of bovine milk: the origin of the pH transition. Journal of Dairy Research 48, 285291.Google Scholar
Kamote, HI, Holmes, CW, Mackenzie, DDS, Holdaway, RJ, Wickham, BW 1994. Effects of once daily milking in later lactation on cows with either low or high initial somatic cell count. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 54, 285287.Google Scholar
Kuhn, N, Linzell, JL 1970. Measurement of the quantity of lactose passing into the mammary venous plasma and lymph in goats and in a cow. Journal of Dairy Research 37, 203208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy-Hulbert, SJ, Woolford, MW, Nicholas, GD, Prosser, CG, Stelwagen, K 1999. Effect of milking frequency and pasture intake on milk yield and composition of late lactation cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 12321239.Google Scholar
Leitner, G, Chaffer, M, Shamay, A, Shapiro, F, Merin, U, Ezra, E, Saran, A, Silanikove, N 2004. Changes in milk composition as affected by subclinical mastitis in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 4652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marques, LT, Fischer, V, Zanela, MB, Ribeiro, MER, Stumpf, W Jr, Manzke, N 2010. Supply of supplements with different levels of energy and protein to Jersey cows and their effects on milk instability. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 39, 27242730.Google Scholar
Marques, LT, Fischer, V, Zanela, MB, Ribeiro, MER, Stumpf, W Jr, Rodrigues, CM 2011. Milk yield, milk composition and biochemical blood profile of lactating cows supplemented with anionic salt. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 40, 10881094.Google Scholar
Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento 2011 . Alteração do caput da□Instrução Normativa MAPA n. 51, de 18 de setembro de 2002 (Instrução Normativa n°62). □Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Moussaoui, F, Vangroenweghe, F, Haddadi, K, Le Roux, Y, Laurent, F, Duchateau, L, Burvenich, C 2004. Proteolysis in milk during experimental Escherichia coli mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 29232931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council 2001. Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 381pp.Google Scholar
Oliveira, CAF, Lopes, LC, Franco, RC, Corassin, CH 2011. Composition and physical–chemical characteristics of unstable non-acid milk received in a dairy plant of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal 12, 508515.Google Scholar
Omoarukhe, ED, On-Nom, N, Grandison, AS, Lewis, MJ 2010. Effects of different calcium salts on properties of milk related to heat stability. International Journal of Dairy Technology 63, 504511.Google Scholar
Schneeberger, EE, Lynch, RD 1992. Structure, function and regulations of cellular tight junctions. American Journal of Physiology 262, 647661.Google Scholar
Smith, RR, Moreira, LVH, Latrille, LL 2002. Characterization of dairy productive systems in the Tenth Region of Chile using multivariate analysis. Agricultura Técnica 62, 375395.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute (SAS) 2008. Statistical analysis systems, version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Stelwagen, K, Davis, SR, Farr, VC, Eichler, SJ 1994. Effect of once daily milking and concurrent somatotropin on mammary tight junction permeability and yield of cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 29943001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelwagen, K, Hopstert, H, Van Der Werf, JTN, Blokhuist, HJ 2000. Short communication: effects of isolation stress on mammary tight junctions in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 4851.Google Scholar
Stelwagen, K, Van Espen, DC, Verkerk, GA, McFadden, HA, Farr, VC 1998a. Elevated plasma cortisol reduces permeability of mammary tight junctions in the lactating bovine mammary epithelium. Journal of Endocrinology 159, 173178.Google Scholar
Stelwagen, K, Mclaren, RD, Turner, SA, McFadden, HA, Prosser, CG 1998b. No evidence for basolateral milk protein secretion in the lactating goat mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 434437.Google Scholar
Tsioulpas, A, Grandison, AS, Lewis, MJ 2007. Changes in physical properties of bovine milk from the colostrum period to early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 50125017.Google Scholar
Verkerk, GA, Phipps, AM, Carragher, JF, Matthews, LR, Stelwagen, K 1998. Characterization of milk cortisol concentrations as a measure of short-term stress responses in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Welfare 7, 7786.Google Scholar
White, JCD, Davies, DT 1958. The relation between the chemical composition of milk and the stability of the caseinate complex: II. Coagulation by ethanol. Journal of Dairy Research 25, 255266.Google Scholar
Wildman, EE, Jones, GM, Wagner, PE, Boman, RL, Troutt, HF Jr, Lesch, TN 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 65, 495501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanela, MB, Fischer, V, Ribeiro, MER 2006. Unstable nonacid milk and milk composition of Jersey cows on feed restriction. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 41, 835840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zettl, KS, Sjaastad, MD, Riskin, PM, Parry, G, Machen, TE, Firestone, GL 1992. Glucocorticoid-induced formation of tight junctions in mouse mammary epithelial cell in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89, 90699073.Google Scholar