Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:18:28.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sedation or anaesthesia decrease the stress response to electroejaculation and improve the quality of the collected semen in goat bucks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2018

S. Abril-Sánchez ,
N. Crosignani ,
A. Freitas-de-Melo ,
A. Terrazas ,
J. P. Damián ,
F. Beracochea ,
P. Silveira  and
R. Ungerfeld
S. Abril-Sánchez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
N. Crosignani
Affiliation:
Departamento de Farmacología, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
A. Freitas-de-Melo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Molecular y Celular, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
A. Terrazas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cautitlán Izcalli, Edo. México, 547114, México
J. P. Damián
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Molecular y Celular, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
F. Beracochea
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
P. Silveira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
R. Ungerfeld*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Electroejaculation (EE) is stressful and probably painful; thus the administration of anaesthesia is recommended to decrease those negative effects. However, anaesthesia has a direct risk of provoking death, but sedation is less risky than anaesthesia. At the same time, α2-adrenergic agonists may improve semen quality. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the physiological and behavioural responses indicative of stress and possibly pain, and the semen quality in electroejaculated untreated, anaesthetised or sedated goat bucks. Semen was collected from eight bucks using three different procedures in all them (EE in untreated bucks, EE under sedation or EE under general anaesthesia). The number of vocalizations during EE and the behavioural pattern before and after procedures were recorded. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was also determined during EE. Rectal temperature, heart rate, serum cortisol concentration, biochemical and haematological parameters were measured before and after each procedure, and sperm characteristics were determined. Bucks vocalised more often when untreated than sedated or anaesthetised (P<0.02). The pain VAS score was greater when bucks were untreated than sedated or anaesthetised (P<0.002). The rectal temperature, heart rate, total protein, albumin and haemoglobin concentrations were greater when bucks were untreated than anaesthetised or sedated (P<0.02). Serum cortisol increased after EE (P=0.0006), without differences between procedures. The frequency and duration of lying down after EE were greater when bucks were anaesthetised than sedated or untreated (P<0.05), and were also greater when bucks were sedated than untreated (P<0.05). The number of times that the animal tried to stand up after EE was greater when bucks were anaesthetised than sedated or untreated (P<0.02). The sperm mass motility was greater when bucks were anaesthetised or sedated than when they were untreated (P=0.048). When animals were sedated, the ejaculate contained more spermatozoa with functional plasma membrane (P=0.03) and morphologically normal (P=0.05) than when they were untreated. In conclusion, general anaesthesia and sedation decreased the stress and probably the pain response provoked by EE and especially sedation improved the quality of the semen collected.

Keywords

animal welfareanimal wellbeingdistressketaminexylazine
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 12 , December 2018 , pp. 2598 - 2608
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abril-Sanchez, S, Freitas-de-melo, A, Damián, JP, Giriboni, J, Villagrá-García, A and Ungerfeld, R 2017. Ejaculation does not contribute to the stress response to electroejaculation in sheep. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 52, 403–408.Google Scholar
Aktas, M, Auguste, D, Lefebvre, HP, Toutain, PL and Braun, JP 1993. Creatine kinase in the dog: A review. Veterinary Research Communications 17, 353–369.Google Scholar
Al-Qarawi, AA and Ali, BH 2005. Isolation stress in desert sheep and goats and the influence of pretreatment with xylazine or sodium betaine. Veterinary Research Communications 29, 81–90.Google Scholar
Anil, SS, Anil, L and Deen, J 2002. Challenges of pain assessment in domestic animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 220, 313–319.Google Scholar
Bath, G 1998. Management of pain in production animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 59, 147–156.Google Scholar
Beracochea, F, Gil, J, Sestelo, A, Garde, JJ, Santiago-Moreno, J, Fumagalli, F and Ungerfeld, R 2014. Sperm characterization and identification of sperm sub-populations in ejaculates from pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus). Animal Reproduction Science 149, 224–230.Google Scholar
Bille, C, Auvigne, V, Libermann, S, Bomassi, E, Durieux, P and Rattez, E 2012. Risk of anaesthetic mortality in dogs and cats: an observational cohort study of 3546 cases. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 39, 59–68.Google Scholar
Brodbelt, DC, Blissitt, KJ, Hammond, RA, Neath, PJ, Young, LE, Pfeiffer, DU and Wood, JLN 2008. The risk of death: the confidential enquiry into perioperative small animal fatalities. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 35, 365–373.Google Scholar
Busso, JM, Ponzio, MF, Chiaraviglio, M, Fiol De Cuneo, M and Ruiz, RD 2005. Electroejaculation in the Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera): effects of anesthesia on seminal characteristics. Research in Veterinary Science 78, 93–97.Google Scholar
Campbell, RC, Dott, HM and Glover, TD 1956. Nigrosin eosin as a stain for differentiating live and dead spermatozoa. The Journal of Agricultural Science 48, 1–8.Google Scholar
Carroll, GL and Hartsfield, SM 1996. General anesthetic techniques in ruminants. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 12, 627–661.Google Scholar
Damián, JP and Ungerfeld, R 2011. The stress response of frequently electroejaculated rams to electroejaculation: hormonal, physiological, biochemical, haematological and behavioural parameters. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 46, 646–650.Google Scholar
Dooley, MP, Pineda, MH, Hopper, JG and Hsu, WH 1990. Retrograde flow of spermatozoa into the urinary bladder of dogs during ejaculation or after sedation with xylazine. American Journal of Veterinary Research 51, 1574–1579.Google Scholar
Dooley, MP, Pineda, MH, Hopper, JG and Hsu, WH 1991. Retrograde flow of spermatozoa into the urinary bladder of cats during electroejaculation, collection of semen with an artificial vagina, and mating. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52, 687–691.Google Scholar
Evans, G and Maxwell, WMC 1987. Salamon’s artificial insemination of sheep and goats. Butterworths, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Falk, AJ, Waldner, CL, Cotter, BS, Gudmundson, J and Barth, AD 2001. Effects of epidural lidocaine anesthesia on bulls during electroejaculation. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 42, 116–120.Google Scholar
Firth, AM and Haldane, SL 1999. Development of a scale to evaluate postoperative pain in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 214, 651–659.Google Scholar
Fumagalli, F, Damián, J and Ungerfeld, R 2015. Vocalizations during electroejaculation in anaesthetized adult and young pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) males. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 50, 321–326.Google Scholar
Grandin, T 1997. Assessment of stress during handling and transport. Journal of Animal Science 75, 249–257.Google Scholar
Ismail, ZB, Jawasreh, K and Al-Majali, A 2010. Effects of xylazine-ketamine-diazepam anesthesia on blood cell counts and plasma biochemical values in sheep and goats. Comparative Clinical Pathology 19, 571–574.Google Scholar
Jennings, DJ 2007. The effect of chemical immobilization on dominance rank in the fallow deer. Animal Behaviour 74, 1107–1110.Google Scholar
Jeyendran, RS, Van der Ven, HH, Perez-Pelaez, M, Crabo, BG and Zaneveld, LJD 1984. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. Journal of reproduction and fertility 70, 219–228.Google Scholar
Knight, TW 1974. A qualitative study of factors affecting the contractions of the epididymis and ductus deferens of the ram. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 40, 19–29.Google Scholar
McDonnell, SM 2001. Oral imipramine and intravenous xylazine for pharmacologically-induced ex copula ejaculation in stallions. Animal Reproduction Science 68, 153–159.Google Scholar
Mcdonnell, SM and Love, C 1991. Xylazine-induced ex copula ejaculation in stallions. Theriogenology 36, 73–76.Google Scholar
McLennan, KM, Rebelo, CJB, Corke, MJ, Holmes, MA, Leach, MC and Constantino-Casas, F 2016. Development of a facial expression scale using footrot and mastitis as models of pain in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 176, 19–26.Google Scholar
Moberg, GP 2000. Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In The biology of animal stress (ed. GP Moberg and JA Mench), pp 1–21. CAB International, Wallingford, UK and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Orihuela, A, Aguirre, V, Hernandez, C, Flores-Perez, I and Vazquez, R 2009a. Effect of anesthesia on welfare aspects of hair sheep (Ovis aries) during electro-ejaculation. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8, 305–308.Google Scholar
Orihuela, A, Aguirre, V, Hernandez, C, Flores-Perez, I and Vazquez, R 2009b. Breaking down the effect of electro-ejaculation on the serum cortisol response, heart and respiratory rates in hair sheep (Ovis aries). Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8, 1968–1972.Google Scholar
Palmer, CW 2005. Welfare aspects of theriogenology: investigating alternatives to electroejaculation of bulls. Theriogenology 64, 469–479.Google Scholar
Patt, A, Gygax, L, Wechsler, B, Hillmann, E, Palme, R and Keil, NM 2013. Factors influencing the welfare of goats in small established groups during the separation and reintegration of individuals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 144, 63–72.Google Scholar
Pelletier, F, Hogg, JT and Festa-Bianchet, M 2004. Effect of chemical immobilization on social status of bighorn rams. Animal Behaviour 67, 1163–1165.Google Scholar
Pursel, VG and Johnson, LA 1974. Glutaraldehyde fixation of boar spermatozoa for acrosome evaluation. Theriogenology 1, 63–68.Google Scholar
Price, EO and Thos, J 1980. Behavioral responses to short-term social isolation in sheep and goats. Applied Animal. Ethology 6, 331–339.Google Scholar
Provenza, FD, Lynch, JJ and Nolan, JV 1994. Food aversion conditioned in anesthetized sheep. Physiology & Behavior 55, 429–432.Google Scholar
Prunier, A, Mounier, L, Le Neindre, P, Leterrier, C, Morméde, P, Paulmier, V, Prunet, P, Terlouw, C and Guatteo, R 2013. Identifying and monitoring pain in farm animals: a review. Animal 7, 998–1010.Google Scholar
Rushen, J 2000. Some issues in the interpretation of behavioural responses to stress. In The biology of animal stress (ed. GP Moberg and JA Mench), pp 23–42. CAB International, Wallingford, UK and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 2016. SAS® University Edition. https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/university-edition.html.Google Scholar
Seddighi, R and Doherty, TJ 2016. Field sedation and anesthesia of ruminants. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 32, 553–570.Google Scholar
Smith, GM, Fry, JM, Allen, JG and Costa, ND 1994. Plasma indicators of muscle damage in a model of nutritional myopathy in weaner sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 71, 12–17.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ 1995. Electroejaculation: a welfare issue. Surveillance 22, 15–17.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ, Spoorenberg, J, West, DM, Vermunt, JJ, Petrie, N and Lawoko, CR 1996. The effect of electro-ejaculation on aversive behaviour and plasma cortisol concentration in rams. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 44, 95–98.Google Scholar
Taylor, PM 1991. Anaesthesia in sheep and goats. In Practice 22, 126–135.Google Scholar
Watson, PF 1976. Electroejaculation, semen characteristics and semen preservation of the brindled gnu. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 47, 123–126.Google Scholar
Wewers, ME and Lowe, NK 1990. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing & Health 13, 227–236.Google Scholar
Whitlock, BK, Coffman, EA, Coetzee, JF and Daniel, JA 2012. Electroejaculation increased vocalization and plasma concentrations of cortisol and progesterone, but not substance P, in beef bulls. Theriogenology 78, 737–746.Google Scholar
Zambelli, D, Cunto, M, Prati, F and Merlo, B 2007. Effects of ketamine or medetomidine administration on quality of electroejaculated sperm and on sperm flow in the domestic cat. Theriogenology 68, 796–803.Google Scholar