Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:17:31.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review: welfare of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

G. Arnott ,
C. P. Ferris  and
N. E. O’Connell
G. Arnott*
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
C. P. Ferris
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough, BT26 6 DR, UK
N. E. O’Connell
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of continuous housing systems for dairy cows, with various reasons put forward to advocate such systems. However, the welfare of dairy cows is typically perceived to be better within pasture-based systems, although such judgements are often not scientifically based. The aim of this review was to interrogate the existing scientific literature to compare the welfare, including health, of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based systems. Although summarising existing work, knowledge gaps and directions for future research are also identified. The scope of the review is broad, examining relevant topics under three main headings; health, behaviour and physiology. Regarding health, cows on pasture-based systems had lower levels of lameness, hoof pathologies, hock lesions, mastitis, uterine disease and mortality compared with cows on continuously housed systems. Pasture access also had benefits for dairy cow behaviour, in terms of grazing, improved lying/resting times and lower levels of aggression. Moreover, when given the choice between pasture and indoor housing, cows showed an overall preference for pasture, particularly at night. However, the review highlighted the need for a deeper understanding of cow preference and behaviour. Potential areas for concern within pasture-based systems included physiological indicators of more severe negative energy balance, and in some situations, the potential for compromised welfare with exposure to unpredictable weather conditions. In summary, the results from this review highlight that there remain considerable animal welfare benefits from incorporating pasture access into dairy production systems.

Keywords

cattlecontinuous housingdairywelfare
Type
Review Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , February 2017 , pp. 261 - 273
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abade, CC, Fregonesi, JA, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM 2015. Dairy cow preference and usage of an alternative freestall design. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 960–965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AbuGhazaleh, AA, Felton, DO and Ibrahim, SA 2007. Milk conjugated linoleic acid response to fish oil and sunflower oil supplementation to dairy cows managed under two feeding systems. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4763–4769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agneessens, J, Claerebout, E, Dorny, P, Borgsteede, FHM and Vercruysse, J 2000. Nematode parasitism in adult dairy cows in Belgium. Veterinary Parasitology 90, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvasen, K, Mork, MJ, Sandgren, CH, Thomsen, PT and Emanuelson, U 2012. Herd-level risk factors associated with cow mortality in Swedish dairy herds.Journal of Dairy Science 95, 4352–4362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvasen, K, Roth, A, Mork, MJ, Sandgren, CH, Thomsen, PT and Emanuelson, U 2014. Farm characteristics related to on-farm cow mortality in dairy herds: a questionnaire study. Animal 8, 1735–1742.Google Scholar
Andersen, IL, Naevdal, E, Boe, KE and Bakken, M 2006. The significance of theories in behavioural ecology for solving problems in applied ethology: possibilities and limitations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, G and Elwood, RW 2008. Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Animal Behaviour 76, 529–542.Google Scholar
Arnott, G and Elwood, RW 2009. Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Animal Behaviour 77, 991–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, LG, O’Connell, NE, McCoy, MA, Keady, TWJ and Kilpatrick, DJ 2009. Effects of breed and production system on lameness parameters in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2174–2182.Google Scholar
Bargo, F, Muller, LD, Delahoy, JE and Cassidy, TW 2002. Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2948–2963.Google Scholar
Barkema, HW, Schukken, YH, Lam, TJGM, Beiboer, ML, Benedictus, G and Brand, A 1999. Management practices associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 1643–1654.Google Scholar
Barker, ZE, Amory, JR, Wright, JL, Mason, SA, Blowey, RW and Green, LE 2009. Risk factors for increased rates of sole ulcers, white line disease, and digital dermatitis in dairy cattle from twenty-seven farms in England and Wales. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 1971–1978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, ZE, Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Bell, NJ and Main, DCJ 2010. Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated risk factors in dairy herds in England and Wales. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 932–941.Google Scholar
Bendixen, PH, Vilson, B, Ekesbo, I and Astrand, DB 1986. Disease frequencies of tied zero-grazing dairy cows and of dairy cows on pasture during summer and tied during winter. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 4, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendixen, PH, Vilson, B, Ekesbo, I and Astrand, DB 1988. Disease frequencies in dairy cows in Sweden. 5. Mastitis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 5, 263–274.Google Scholar
Bennema, SC, Ducheyne, E, Vercruysse, J, Claerebout, E, Hendrickx, G and Charlier, J 2011. Relative importance of management, meteorological and environmental factors in the spatial distribution of Fasciola hepatica in dairy cattle in a temperate climate zone. International Journal for Parasitology 41, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennema, SC, Vercruysse, J, Morgan, E, Stafford, K, Hoglund, J, Demeler, J, von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G. and Charlier, J 2010. Epidemiology and risk factors for exposure to gastrointestinal nematodes in dairy herds in northwestern Europe. Veterinary Parasitology 173, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergen, RD, Kennedy, AD and Christopherson, RJ 2001. Effects of intermittent cold exposure varying in intensity on core body temperature and resting heat production of beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81, 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardi, F, Fregonesi, J, Winckler, C, Veira, DM, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM 2009. The stall-design paradox: neck rails increase lameness but improve udder and stall hygiene. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 3074–3080.Google Scholar
Boissy, A, Manteuffel, G, Jensen, MB, Moe, RO, Spruijt, B, Keeling, LJ, Winckler, C, Forkman, B, Dimitrov, I, Langbein, J, Bakken, M, Veisser, I and Aubert, A 2007. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiology and Behavior 92, 375–397.Google Scholar
Boken, SL, Staples, CR, Sollenberger, LE, Jenkins, TC and Thatcher, WW 2005. Effect of grazing and fat supplementation on production and reproduction of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 4258–4272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgsteede, FHM, Tibben, J, Cornelissen, JBWJ, Agneessens, J and Gaasenbeek, CPH 2000. Nematode parasites of adult dairy cattle in the Netherlands. Veterinary Parasitology 89, 287–296.Google Scholar
Breen, JE, Green, MJ and Bradley, AJ 2009. Quarter and cow risk factors associated with the occurrence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows in the United Kingdom. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2551–2561.Google Scholar
Brennan, ML, Kemp, R and Christley, RM 2008. Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 84, 242–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks-Pollock, E, Roberts, GO and Keeling, MJ 2014. A dynamic model of bovine tuberculosis spread and control in Great Britain. Nature 511, 228–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruun, J, Ersboll, AK and Alban, L 2002. Risk factors for metritis in Danish dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 54, 179–190.Google Scholar
Burow, E, Rousing, T, Thomsen, PT, Otten, ND and Sorensen, JT 2013a. Effect of grazing on the cow welfare of dairy herds evaluated by a multidimensional welfare index. Animal 7, 834–842.Google Scholar
Burow, E, Thomsen, PT, Rousing, T and Sorensen, JT 2013b. Daily grazing time as a risk factor for alterations at the hock joint integument in dairy cows. Animal 7, 160–166.Google Scholar
Burow, E, Thomsen, PT, Rousing, T and Sorensen, JT 2014. Track way distance and cover as risk factors for lameness in Danish dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 113, 625–628.Google Scholar
Burow, E, Thomsen, PT, Sorensen, JT and Rousing, T 2011. The effect of grazing on cow mortality in Danish dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 100, 237–241.Google Scholar
Butler, ST 2014. Nutritional management to optimize fertility of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. Animal 8, 15–26.Google Scholar
Chapinal, N, Barrientos, AK, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Galo, E and Weary, DM 2013. Herd-level risk factors for lameness in freestall farms in the northeastern United States and California. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 318–328.Google Scholar
Chapinal, N, Goldhawk, C, de Passille, AM, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Weary, DM and Rushen, J 2010. Overnight access to pasture does not reduce milk production or feed intake in dairy cattle. Livestock Science 129, 104–110.Google Scholar
Charlier, J, Claerebout, E, De Muelenaere, E and Vercruysse, J 2005. Associations between dairy herd management factors and bulk tank milk antibody levels against Ostertagia ostertagi . Veterinary Parasitology 133, 91–100.Google Scholar
Charlton, GL, Rutter, SM, East, M and Sinclair, LA 2011a. Preference of dairy cows: indoor cubicle housing with access to a total mixed ration vs. access to pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 130, 1–9.Google Scholar
Charlton, GL, Rutter, SM, East, M and Sinclair, LA 2011b. Effects of providing total mixed rations indoors and on pasture on the behavior of lactating dairy cattle and their preference to be indoors or on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3875–3884.Google Scholar
Charlton, GL, Rutter, SM, East, M and Sinclair, LA 2013. The motivation of dairy cows for access to pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 4387–4396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chirico, J, Jonsson, P, Kjellberg, S and Thomas, G 1997. Summer mastitis experimentally induced by Hydrotaea irritans exposed to bacteria. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 11, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, MS 1990. From an animal’s point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, 1–9.Google Scholar
De Vries, M, Bokkers, EAM, van Reenen, CG, Engel, B, van Schaik, G, Dijkstra, T and de Boer, IJM 2015. Housing and management factors associated with indicators of dairy cattle welfare. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 118, 80–92.Google Scholar
Drackley, JK and Cardoso, FC 2014. Prepartum and postpartum nutritional management to optimize fertility in high-yielding dairy cows in confined TMR systems. Animal 8, 5–14.Google Scholar
Ellis, KA, Innocent, GT, Mihm, M, Cripps, P, McLean, WG, Howard, CV and Grove-White, D 2007. Dairy cow cleanliness and milk quality on organic and conventional farms in the UK. Journal of Dairy Research 74, 302–310.Google Scholar
Ellis, KA, Billington, K, McNeil, B and McKeegan, DEF 2009. Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfare. Animal Welfare 18, 267–282.Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2009a. Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease, report of the panel on animal health and welfare. The EFSA Journal 1143, 1–284.Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2009b. Scientific opinion on the overall effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease, scientific opinion of the panel on animal health and animal welfare. The EFSA Journal 1143, 1–38.Google Scholar
Falk, AC, Weary, DM, Winckler, C and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2012. Preference for pasture versus freestall housing by dairy cattle when stall availability indoors is reduced. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6409–6415.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2006. Livestock’s long shadow. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.HTM.Google Scholar
Fell, GL, Robinson, KC, Mao, J, Woolf, CJ and Fisher, DE 2014. Skin β-endorphin mediates addiction to UV light. Cell 157, 1527–1534.Google Scholar
Fisher, AD, Verkerk, GA, Morrow, CJ and Matthews, LR 2002. The effects of feed restriction and lying deprivation on pituitary-adrenal axis regulation in lactating cows. Livestock Production Science 73, 255–263.Google Scholar
Fontaneli, RS, Sollenberger, LE, Littell, RC and Staples, CR 2005. Performance of lactating dairy cows managed on pasture-based or in freestall barn-feeding systems. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1264–1276.Google Scholar
Forbes, AB, Huckle, CA and Gibb, MJ 2004. Impact of eprinomectin on grazing behaviour and performance in dairy cattle with sub-clinical gastrointestinal nematode infections under continuous stocking management. Veterinary Parasitology 125, 353–364.Google Scholar
Forbes, AB, Vercruysse, J and Charlier, J 2008. A survey of the exposure to Ostertagia ostertagi in dairy cow herds in Europe through the measurement of antibodies in milk samples from the bulk tank. Veterinary Parasitology 157, 100–107.Google Scholar
Gibb, MJ, Huckle, CA and Forbes, AB 2005. Effects of sequential treatments with eprinomectin on performance and grazing behaviour in dairy cattle under daily-paddock stocking management. Veterinary Parasitology 133, 79–90.Google Scholar
Godfray, HCJ, Donnelly, CA, Kao, RR, Macdonald, W, McDonald, RA, Petrokofsky, G, Wood, JLN, Woodroffe, R, Young, DB and McLean, AR 2013. A restatement of the natural science evidence base relevant to the control of bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 280, 20131634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, JJ, Wildman, EE, Pankey, JW, Kunkel, JR, Howard, DB and Murphy, BM 1992. The influence of intensively managed rotational grazing, traditional continuous grazing, and confinement housing on bulk tank milk quality and udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 96–104.Google Scholar
Harding, EJ, Paul, ES and Mendl, M 2004. Animal behaviour: cognitive bias and affective state. Nature 427, 312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, PH, Gorman, S and Finlay-Jones, JJ 2011. Modulation of the immune system by UV radiation: more than just the effects of vitamin D? Nature Reviews Immunology 11, 584–596.Google Scholar
Haskell, MJ, Maslowska, K, Bell, DJ, Roberts, DJ and Langford, FM 2013. The effect of a view to the surroundings and microclimate variables on use of a loafing area in housed dairy cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 147, 28–33.Google Scholar
Haskell, MJ, Rennie, LJ, Bowell, VA, Bell, MJ and Lawrence, AB 2006. Housing system, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4259–4266.Google Scholar
Haufe, HC, Gygax, L, Wechsler, B, Stauffacher, M and Friedli, K 2012. Influence of floor surface and access to pasture on claw health in dairy cows kept in cubicle housing systems. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 105, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, PH, Barnett, JL, Beveridge, L and Matthews, LR 1995. The welfare of extensively managed dairy cattle: a review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42, 161–182.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Mendo, O, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Veira, DM and Weary, DM 2007. Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1209–1214.Google Scholar
Huxley, JN 2013. Impact of lameness and claw lesions in cows on health and production. Livestock Science 156, 64–70.Google Scholar
Hymoller, L and Jensen, SK 2012. 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol status in plasma is linearly correlated to daily summer pasture time in cattle at 56°N. British Journal of Nutrition 108, 666–671.Google Scholar
Ingvartsen, KL 2006. Feeding- and management-related diseases in the transition cow: physiological adaptations around calving and strategies to reduce feeding-related diseases. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126, 175–213.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, J and Saxholt, E 2009. Vitamin D metabolites in bovine milk and butter. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 22, 472–478.Google Scholar
Jensen, MB and Pedersen, LJ 2008. Using motivation tests to assess ethological needs and preferences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113, 340–356.Google Scholar
Jensen, MB, Pedersen, LJ and Munksgaard, L 2005. The effect of reward duration on demand functions for rest in dairy heifers and lying requirements as measured by demand functions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, J, McDonald, RA, Walker, N and Delahay, RJ 2011. Effectiveness of biosecurity measures in preventing badger visits to farm buildings. PLoS One 6, e28941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, JK, Roche, JR, Kolver, ES, Thomson, NA and Baumgard, LH 2005. A comparison between feeding systems (pasture and TMR) and the effect of vitamin E supplementation on plasma and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 72, 322–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, AD, Bergen, RD, Christopherson, RJ, Glover, ND and Small, JA 2005. Effect of once daily 5-h or 10-h cold-exposures on body temperature and resting heat production of beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 85, 177–183.Google Scholar
Kester, E, Holzhauer, M and Frankena, K 2014. A descriptive review of the prevalence and risk factors of hock lesions in dairy cows. The Veterinary Journal 202, 222–228.Google Scholar
Kilgour, RJ 2012. In pursuit of ‘normal’: a review of the behaviour of cattle at pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 138, 1–11.Google Scholar
Kirkden, RD and Pajor, EA 2006. Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animals’ feelings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100, 29–47.Google Scholar
Kolver, ES and Muller, LD 1998. Performance and nutrient intake of high producing Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1403–1411.Google Scholar
Laven, RA and Lawrence, KR 2006. An evaluation of the seasonality of veterinary treatments for lameness in UK dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3858–3865.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, SJ 2014. Reproductive tract inflammatory disease in postpartum dairy cows. Animal 8, 54–63.Google Scholar
Legrand, AL, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM 2009. Preference and usage of pasture versus free-stall housing by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 3651–3658.Google Scholar
Liu, D, Fernandez, BO, Hamilton, A, Lang, NN, Gallagher, JMC, Newby, DE, Feelisch, M and Weller, RB 2014. UVA irradiation of human skin vasodilates arterial vasculature and lowers blood pressure independently of nitric oxide synthase. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 134, 1839–1846.Google Scholar
Loberg, J, Telezhenko, E, Bergsten, C and Lidfors, L 2004. Behaviour and claw health in tied dairy cows with varying access to exercise in an outdoor paddock. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, R, Whay, HR, Klement, E and Nicol, CJ 2016. Invited review: environmental enrichment of dairy cows and calves in indoor housing. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 1695–1715.Google Scholar
March, MD, Haskell, MJ, Chagunda, MGG, Langford, FM and Roberts, DJ 2014. Current trends in British dairy management regimens. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 7985–7994.Google Scholar
Mee, JF 2012. Reproductive issues arising from different management systems in the dairy industry. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 47, 42–50.Google Scholar
Mee, JF, Geraghty, T, O’Neill, R and More, SJ 2012. Bioexclusion of diseases from dairy and beef farms: risks of introducing infectious agents and risk reduction strategies. The Veterinary Journal 194, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meerlo, P, Sgoifo, A and Turek, FW 2002. The effects of social defeat and other stressors on the expression of circadian rhythms. Stress 5, 15–22.Google Scholar
Miller, K and Woodgush, DGM 1991. Some effects of housing on the social behavior of dairy cows. Animal Production 53, 271–278.Google Scholar
Motupalli, PR, Sinclair, LA, Charlton, GL, Bleach, EC and Rutter, SM 2014. Preference and behavior of lactating dairy cows given free access to pasture at two herbage masses and two distances. Journal of Animal Science 92, 5175–5184.Google Scholar
Moustakas, A and Evans, MR 2015. Coupling models of cattle and farms with models of badgers for predicting the dynamics of bovine tuberculosis (TB). Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 29, 623–636.Google Scholar
National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) 2010. Dairy 2007. Facility characteristics and cow comfort on U.S. dairy operations 2007. Retrieved on 7 August 2015 from http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy07/Dairy07_ir_Facilities.pdf.Google Scholar
Nielsen, BH, Thomsen, PT and Sorensen, JT 2011. Identifying risk factors for poor hind limb cleanliness in Danish loose-housed dairy cows. Animal 5, 1613–1619.Google Scholar
O’Connell, J, Giller, PS and Meaney, W 1989. A comparison of dairy cattle behavioural patterns at pasture and during confinement. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 65–72.Google Scholar
Olmos, G, Boyle, L, Hanlon, A, Patton, J, Murphy, JJ and Mee, JF 2009a. Hoof disorders, locomotion ability and lying times of cubicle-housed compared to pasture-based dairy cows. Livestock Science 125, 199–207.Google Scholar
Olmos, G, Mee, JF, Hanlon, A, Patton, J, Murphy, JJ and Boyle, L 2009b. Peripartum health and welfare of Holstein-Friesian cows in a confinement-TMR system compared to a pasture-based system. Animal Welfare 18, 467–476.Google Scholar
Olson, BE and Wallander, RT 2002. Influence of winter weather and shelter on activity patterns of beef cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82, 491–501.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, DT 2014. Badger-cattle interactions in the rural environment: implications for bovine tuberculosis transmission. Report for Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Belfast, Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
Onyiro, OM and Brotherstone, S 2008. Genetic analysis of locomotion and associated conformation traits of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows managed in different housing systems. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 322–328.Google Scholar
Potterton, SL, Green, MJ, Harris, J, Millar, KM, Whay, HR and Huxley, JN 2011. Risk factors associated with hair loss, ulceration, and swelling at the hock in freestall-housed UK dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2952–2963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reijs, JW, Daatselaar, CHG, Helming, JFM, Jager, J and Beldman, ACG 2013. Grazing dairy cows in North-West Europe; Economic farm performance and future developments with emphasis on the Dutch situation. LEI Report 2013-001. LEI (Landbouw Economisch Instituut), Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Roca-Fernandez, AI, Ferris, CP and Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A 2013. Short communication. Behavioural activities of two dairy cow genotypes (Holstein-Friesian vs. Jersey x Holstein-Friesian) in two milk production systems (grazing vs. confinement). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 120–126.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Lainz, A, Melendez-Retamal, P, Hird, DW, Read, DH and Walker, RL 1999. Farm and host-level risk factors for papillomatous digital dermatitis in Chilean dairy cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 42, 87–97.Google Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y, Dougherty, RW and Cook, HM 1974. Jaw movements and rumen motility as criteria for measurement of deep sleep in cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research 35, 1309–1312.Google ScholarPubMed
Rushen, J and de Passille, AMB 1992. The scientific assessment of the impact of housing on animal welfare: a critical review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72, 721–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, KMD, Langford, FM, Jack, MC, Sherwood, L, Lawrence, AB and Haskell, MJ 2008. Hock injury prevalence and associated risk factors on organic and nonorganic dairy farms in the United Kingdom. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2265–2274.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J, Dohoo, I, Carrier, J and DesCoteaux, L 2004. A meta-analysis of the milk production response after anthelmintic treatment in naturally infected adult dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 63, 237–256.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J, Nodtvedt, A, Dohoo, I and DesCoteaux, L 2002. The effect of eprinomectin treatment at calving on reproduction parameters in adult dairy cows in Canada. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 56, 165–177.Google Scholar
Schreiner, DA and Ruegg, PL 2003. Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3460–3465.Google Scholar
Schuppli, CA, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM 2014. Access to pasture for dairy cows: responses from an online engagement. Journal of Animal Science 92, 5185–5192.Google Scholar
Schutz, KE, Clark, KV, Cox, NR, Matthews, LR and Tucker, CB 2010. Responses to short-term exposure to simulated rain and wind by dairy cattle: time budgets, shelter use, body temperature and feed intake. Animal Welfare 19, 375–383.Google Scholar
Schutz, KE and Cox, NR 2014. Effects of short-term repeated exposure to different flooring surfaces on the behavior and physiology of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 2753–2762.Google Scholar
Sheldon, IM, Lewis, GS, LeBlanc, S and Gilbert, RO 2006. Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology 65, 1516–1530.Google Scholar
Singh, SS, Ward, WR, Lautenbach, K, Hughes, JW and Murray, RD 1993. Behavior of 1st lactation and adult dairy cows while housed and at pasture and its relationship with sole lesions. Veterinary Record 133, 469–474.Google Scholar
Somers, JGCJ, Frankena, K, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN and Metz, JHM 2003. Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2082–2093.Google Scholar
Somers, JGCJ, Frankena, K, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN and Metz, JHM 2005. Risk factors for digital dermatitis in dairy cows kept in cubicle houses in the Netherlands. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 71, 11–21.Google Scholar
Thomsen, PT and Houe, H 2006. Dairy cow mortality. A review. Veterinary Quarterly 28, 122–129.Google Scholar
Thomsen, PT, Kjeldsen, AM, Sorensen, JT, Houe, H and Ersboll, AK 2006. Herd-level risk factors for the mortality of cows in Danish dairy herds. Veterinary Record 158, 622–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomsen, PT, Ostergaard, S, Houe, H and Sorensen, JT 2007b. Loser cows in Danish dairy herds: risk factors. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 79, 136–154.Google Scholar
Thomsen, PT, Ostergaard, S, Sorensen, JT and Houe, H 2007a. Loser cows in Danish dairy herds: definition, prevalence and consequences. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 79, 116–135.Google Scholar
Tolhurst, BA, Delahay, RJ, Walker, NJ, Ward, AI and Roper, TJ 2009. Behaviour of badgers (Meles meles) in farm buildings: opportunities for the transmission of Mycobacterium bovis to cattle? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 117, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, CB, Rogers, AR, Verkerk, GA, Kendall, PE, Webster, JR and Matthews, LR 2007. Effects of shelter and body condition on the behaviour and physiology of dairy cattle in winter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 105, 1–13.Google Scholar
Vance, ER, Ferris, CP, Elliott, CT, McGettrick, SA and Kilpatrick, DJ 2012. Food intake, milk production, and tissue changes of Holstein-Friesian and Jersey x Holstein-Friesian dairy cows within a medium-input grazing system and a high-input total confinement system. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 1527–1544.Google Scholar
Vanderstichel, R, Dohoo, I, Sanchez, J and Conboy, G 2012. Effects of farm management practices and environmental factors on bulk tank milk antibodies against gastrointestinal nematodes in dairy farms across Canada. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 104, 53–64.Google Scholar
Van Iaer, E, Moons, CPH, Sonck, B and Tuyttens, FAM 2014. Importance of outdoor shelter for cattle in temperate climates. Livestock Science 159, 87–101.Google Scholar
Veling, J, Wilpshaar, H, Frankena, K, Bartels, C and Barkema, HW 2002. Risk factors for clinical Salmonella enterica subsp enterica serovar Typhimurium infection on Dutch dairy farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 54, 157–168.Google Scholar
Ward, AI, Judge, J and Delahay, RJ 2010. Farm husbandry and badger behaviour: opportunities to manage badger to cattle transmission of Mycobacterium bovis? Preventive Veterinary Medicine 93, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Washburn, SP, White, SL, Green, JT and Benson, GA 2002. Reproduction, mastitis, and body condition of seasonally calved Holstein and Jersey cows in confinement or pasture systems. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 105–111.Google Scholar
Webster, JR, Stewart, M, Rogers, AR and Verkerk, GA 2008. Assessment of welfare from physiological and behavioural responses of New Zealand dairy cows exposed to cold and wet conditions. Animal Welfare 17, 19–26.Google Scholar
White, SL, Bertrand, JA, Wade, MR, Washburn, SP, Green, JT and Jenkins, TC 2001. Comparison of fatty acid content of milk from Jersey and Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 2295–2301.Google Scholar
White, SL, Benson, GA, Washburn, SP and Green, JT 2002. Milk production and economic measures in confinement or pasture systems using seasonally calved Holstein and Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 95–104.Google Scholar