Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:15:11.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of feeding prebiotics on nutrient digestibility, faecal microbiota composition and short-chain fatty acid concentrations in dogs: a meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

A. K. Patra
A. K. Patra*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, 37 K. B. Sarani, Belgachia, Kolkata, 700037, India
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effects of prebiotics on digestibility, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations and bacterial populations in the faeces and immunity in dogs were evaluated by meta-analyses. Overall, data from 15 published studies containing 65 different treatment means of 418 observations from different breeds of dogs were included in the data set. Feeding of prebiotics to dogs did not affect the nutrient intake (P > 0.10), nor did prebiotics change (P > 0.10) the digestibility of dry matter (DM) and fat. However, crude protein (CP) digestibility tended to decrease quadratically (P = 0.06) with increasing dosages of prebiotics, although the degree of prediction was low (R2 = 0.33). The concentration of total SCFA (P = 0.08; R2 = 0.90) tended to increase linearly, whereas concentration of acetate (R2 = 0.25), propionate (R2 = 0.88) and butyrate (R2 = 0.85) increased quadratically with increasing dosage of prebiotics in the faeces of dogs. The numbers of beneficial bifidobacteria (P < 0.01; R2 = 0.62) increased quadratically, but lactobacilli (P < 0.01; R2 = 0.66) increased linearly with increasing supplementation of prebiotics. The changes in healthy bacterial numbers were affected by the interaction of initial bacterial numbers and dose of prebiotics; bacterial numbers increased relatively more when initial bacterial numbers were low. Dietary composition did not influence the response of prebiotics on lactobacilli and bifidobacterial numbers in this study. The numbers of pathogenic Clostridium perfringens and Escherichia coli were not affected by prebiotics. Prebiotics did not affect the serum immunoglobulin (Ig) concentrations such as IgG, IgA and IgM in dogs. Although prebiotics may tend to have an adverse effect on CP digestibility, prebiotics at doses up to 1.40% food intake (DM basis) might increase the beneficial bacterial populations and SCFA concentrations in the faeces of dogs. Thus, the feeding of prebiotics has a great prospective to improve the intestinal health of dogs.

Keywords

dogprebioticsdigestibilityfatty acid concentrationsfaecal microbiota
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 11 , 26 September 2011 , pp. 1743 - 1750
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beynen, AC, Baas, JC, Hoekemeijer, PE, Kappert, HJ, Bakker, MH, Koopman, JP, Lemmens, AG 2002. Faecal bacterial profile, nitrogen excretion and mineral absorption in healthy dogs fed supplemental oligofructose. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 89, 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkholder, KM, Thompson, KL, Einstein, ME, Applegate, TJ, Patterson, JA 2008. Influence of stressors on normal intestinal microbiota, intestinal morphology, and susceptibility to Salmonella enteritidis colonization in broilers. Poultry Science 87, 1734–1741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummings, JH, Antoine, J-M, Azpiroz, F, Bourdet-Sicard, R, Brandtzaeg, P, Calder, PC, Gibson, GR, Guarner, F, Isolauri, E, Pannemans, D, Shortt, C, Tuijtelaars, S, Watzl, B 2004. PASSCLAIM – gut health and immunity. European Journal of Nutrition 43 (suppl. 2), II/118–II/173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diez, M, Hornick, JL, Baldwin, P, Van Eenaeme, C, Istasse, L 1998. The influence of sugar-beet fibre, guar gum and inulin on nutrient digestibility, water consumption and plasma metabolites in healthy beagle dogs. Research in Veterinary Science 64, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, CJ, McBurmey, AMI, Massimino, S, Hayek, MG, Sunvold, GD 1999. The fermentable fibre content of the diet alters the function and composition of canine gut associated lymphoid tissue. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 72, 325–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flickinger, EA, Schreijen, EMWC, Patil, AR, Hussein, HS, Grieshop, CM, Merchen, NR, Fahey, GC Jr 2003. Nutrient digestibilities, microbial populations, and protein catabolites as affected by fructan supplementation of dog diets. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2008–2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, GR, Roberfroid, MB 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition 125, 1401–1412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, GR, McCartney, AL, Rastall, RA 2005. Prebiotics and resistance to gastrointestinal infections. British Journal of Nutrition 93 (suppl. 1), S31–S34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, GR, Probert, HM, van Loo, J, Rastall, RA, Roberfroid, MB 2004. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutrition Research Reviews 17, 259–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grieshop, CM, Flickinger, EA, Fahey, GC Jr 2002. Oral administration of arabinogalactan affects immune status and fecal microbial populations in dogs. Journal of Nutrition 132, 478–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grieshop, CM, Flickinger, EA, Bruce, KJ, Patil, AR, Czarnecki-Maulden, GL, Fahey, GC Jr 2004. Gastrointestinal and immunological responses of senior dogs to chicory and mannan-oligosaccharides. Archives of Animal Nutrition 58, 483–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guarner, F 2005. Inulin and oligofructose: impact on intestinal diseases and disorders. British Journal of Nutrition 93 (suppl. 1), S61–S65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesta, M, Roosen, W, Janssens, GPJ, Millet, S, De Wilde, R 2003. Prebiotics affect nutrient digestibility but not faecal ammonia in dogs fed increased dietary protein levels. British Journal of Nutrition 90, 1007–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, MJ, Sharp, R, Macfarlane, GT 2001. Age and disease related changes in intestinal bacterial populations assessed by cell culture, 16S rRNA abundance and community cellular fatty acid profiles. Gut 48, 198–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, PT, Blaza, SE, Holme, DW 1982. Assessment of endogenous nitrogen output in adult dogs of contrasting size using a protein-free diet. Journal of Nutrition 112, 1281–1286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsay, JO, Whelan, K, Stagg, AJ, Gobin, P, Al-Hassi, HO, Rayment, N, Kamm, MA, Knight, SC, Forbes, A 2006. Clinical, microbiological, and immunological effects of fructo-oligosaccharide in patients with Crohn's disease. Gut 55, 348–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macfarlane, GT, Steed, H, Macfarlane, S 2008. Bacterial metabolism and health-related effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and other prebiotics. Journal of Applied Microbiology 104, 305–344.Google ScholarPubMed
Middelbos, IS, Godoy, MR, Fastinger, ND, Fahey, GC Jr 2007a. A dose-response evaluation of spray-dried yeast cell wall supplementation of diets fed to adult dogs: effects on nutrient digestibility, immune indices, and fecal microbial populations. Journal of Animal Science 85, 3022–3032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Middelbos, IS, Fastinger, ND, Fahey, GC Jr 2007b. Evaluation of fermentable oligosaccharides in diets fed to dogs in comparison to fiber standards. Journal of Animal Science 85, 3033–3044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouwehand, AC, Makelainen, H, Tiihonen, K, Rautonen, N 2006. Digestive health. In Sweeteners and sugar alternatives in food technology, 1st edition (ed. H Mitchell), pp. 44–53. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patra, AK 2009. Responses of intake, digestibility and nitrogen utilization in goats fed low-quality roughages supplementing with tree foliages. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89, 1462–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patra, AK 2010. Aspects of nitrogen utilization in sheep fed mixed diets containing foliages from trees and browses. British Journal of Nutrition 103, 1319–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool-Zobel, B, Van Loo, J, Rowland, I, Roberfroid, MB 2002. Experimental evidences on the potential of prebiotic fructans to reduce the risk of colon cancer. British Journal of Nutrition 87 (suppl. 2), S273–S281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Propst, EL, Flickinger, EA, Bauer, LL, Merchen, NR, Fahey, GC 2003. A dose-response experiment evaluating the effects of oligofructose and inulin on nutrient digestibility, stool quality, and faecal protein catabolites in healthy adult dogs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3057–3066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, KR, Saxton, AM, Southern, LL 2006. Estimation of nutrient requirements using broken-line regression analysis. Journal of Animal Science 84 (E. suppl.), E155–E165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, WEW 1995. The place of short-chain fatty acids in colonocyte metabolism in health and ulcerative colitis: the impaired colonocyte barrier. In Physiological and clinical aspects of short-chain fatty acids(ed. JH Cummings, JL Rombeau and T Sakata), pp. 337–351. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2001. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8, 2nd edition. SAS, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P, Daudin, JJ, St-Pierre, NR 2008. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal 2, 1203–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiffrin, EJ, Rochat, F, Link-Amster, H, Aeschlimann, JM, Donnet-Hughes, A 1995. Immunomodulation of human blood cells following the ingestion of lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 491–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, DH, Shi, CR, Chen, JJ, Yu, SY, Wu, Y, Yan, WB 2009. Detection of intestinal bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in patients with Hirschsprung's disease associated enterocolitis. World Journal of Pediatrics 5, 201–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
St-Pierre, NR 2001. Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 741–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strickling, JA, Harmon, DL, Dawson, KA, Gross, KL 2000. Evaluation of oligosaccharide addition to dog diets: influences on nutrient digestion and microbial populations. Animal Feed Science and Technology 86, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchodolski, JS 2011. Microbes and gastrointestinal health of dogs and cats. Journal of Animal Science 89, 1520–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, KS, Grieshop, CM, Flickinger, EA, Bauer, LL, Chow, J, Wolf, BW, Garleb, KA, Fahey, GC Jr 2002a. Fructooligosaccharides and Lactobacillus acidophilusmodify gut microbial populations, total tract nutrient digestibilities and fecal protein catabolite concentrations in healthy adult dogs. Journal of Nutrition 132, 3721–3731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, KS, Grieshop, CM, Flickinger, EA, Bauer, LL, Healy, HP, Dawson, KA, Merchen, NR, Fahey, GC Jr 2002b. Supplemental fructooligosaccharides and mannanoligosaccharides influence immune function, ileal and total tract nutrient digestibilities, microbial populations and concentrations of protein catabolites in the large bowel of dogs. Journal of Nutrition 132, 980–989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, KS, Grieshop, CM, Flickinger, EA, Healy, HP, Dawson, KA, Merchen, NR, Fahey, GC Jr 2002c. Effects of supplemental fructo-oligosaccharides plus mannan-oligosaccharides on immune function and ileal and fecal microbial populations in adult dogs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 56, 309–318.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ 1988. Effect of environment and quality of fiber on the nutritive value of crop residues. In Plant breeding and the nutritive value of crop residues (ed. JD Reed, BS Capper and PJH Neate), Proceedings of a workshop at International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, 7–10 December, 1987, pp. 71–96.Google Scholar
Verlinden, A, Hesta, M, Hermans, JM, Janssens, GPJ 2006. The effects of inulin supplementation of diets with or without hydrolysed protein sources on digestibility, faecal characteristics, haematology and immunoglobulins in dogs. British Journal of Nutrition 96, 936–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zentek, J, Marquart, B, Pietrzak, T 2002. Intestinal effects of mannan-oligosaccharides, transgalactooligosaccharides, lactose and lactulose in dogs. Journal of Nutrition 132, 1682S–1684S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar