Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:07:11.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-time visual/near-infrared analysis of milk-clotting parameters for industrial applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2011

G. Leitner*
Affiliation:
National Mastitis Reference Center, Kimron Veterinary Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, PO Box 12, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
U. Merin
Affiliation:
Department of Food Quality and Safety, Agricultural Research Organization, the Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
L. Lemberskiy-Kuzin
Affiliation:
S.A.E. Afikim, Afikim, Israel
D. Bezman
Affiliation:
S.A.E. Afikim, Afikim, Israel
G. Katz
Affiliation:
S.A.E. Afikim, Afikim, Israel
*
Get access

Abstract

The economical profitability of the dairy industry is based on the quality of the bulk milk collected in the farms, therefore it was based on the herd level rather than on the individual animals at real time. Udder infection and stage of lactation are directly related to the quality of milk produced on the herd level. However, improvement of milk quality requires testing each animal's milk separately and continuously. Recently, it was postulated that online equipment can estimate milk quality according to its clotting parameters, and thus result in better economical return for cheese making. This study further investigated the potential application of the AfiLab™ equipment to provide real-time analysis of milk-clotting parameters for cheese manufacture and cheese yield on quarter (1018) and individual cow (277) levels. Days in milk, lactose, log SCC and udder infection were found to have a significant effect on curd firmness and cheese properties and yield. The results clearly indicate that: (a) the parameter Afi-CF determined with the AfiLab™ is suitable for assessing milk quality for its clotting parameters, a value which is not provided by merely measuring fat and protein content on the gland and the cow levels; (b) bacterial type is the single major cause of reduced milk quality, with variations depending on the bacterial species; and (c) early and late lactation also had negative effects on milk-clotting parameters. Cheese made from the various milk samples that were determined by the Afilab™ to be of higher quality for cheese making resulted in higher yield and better texture, which were related mainly to the bacterial species and stage of lactation.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auldist, MJ, Coats, S, Sutherland, BJ, Mayes, JJ, McDowell, GH 1996. Effects of somatic cell count and stage of lactation on raw milk composition and the yield and quality of Cheddar cheese. Journal of Dairy Research 63, 269280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbano, DM, Rasmussen, RR, Lynch, JM 1991. Influence of milk somatic cell count and milk age on cheese yield. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 369388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudry, C, de Cremoux, R, Chartier, C, Perrin, G 1997. Impact of mammary gland inflammation on milk yield and composition in goats. Veterinary Research 28, 277286.Google ScholarPubMed
Bynum, DG, Olson, NF 1982. Influence of curd firmness at cutting on Cheddar cheese yield and recovery of milk constituents. Journal of Dairy Science 65, 22812290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulon, JB 1994. Effect of physiological stage and season on dairy milk composition and coagulation properties. Recueil de Medecine Veterinaire 170, 367374.Google Scholar
Davis, SR, Farr, VC, Stelwagen, K 1999. Regulation of yield loss and milk composition during once-daily milking: a review. Livestock Science 59, 7794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons, DB, Binns, M 1990. Cheese yield experiments and proteolysis by milk-clotting enzymes. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 20282043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons, DB, Modler, HW 2010. A commentary on predictive cheese yield formulas. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 55175537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, DB, Dube, C, Modler, HW 2003. Transfer of protein from milk to cheese. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 469485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, DB, Ernstrom, CA, Lacroix, CA, Verret, P 1990. Predictive formulas for yield of cheese from composition of milk: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 13651394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons, DB, Ernstrom, CA, Lacroix, CA, Verret, P 1993. Yield formulae. In Factors affecting the yield of cheese (ed. DB Emmons). International Dairy Federation Special Issue No. 9301, I.D.F., Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Fantuz, F, Plidori, F, Cheli, F, Baldi, A 2001. Plasminogen activation system in goat milk and its relation with composition and coagulation properties. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 17861790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenelon, MA, Guinee, TP 1999. The effect of milk fat on Cheddar cheese yield and its prediction, using modifications of the Van Slyke cheese yield formula. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 22872299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsbäck, L, Lindmark-Månsson, H, Andrén, A, Åkerstedt, M, Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2009. Udder quarter milk composition at different levels of somatic cell count in cow composite milk. Animal 3, 710717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsbäck, L, Lindmark-Månsson, H, Andrén, A, Åkerstedt, M, Andrée, L, Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2010. Day-to-day variation in milk yield and milk composition at the udder-quarter level. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 35693577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalo, C, Carriedo, JA, Baro, JA, Primitivo, FS 1994. Factors influencing variations of test-day milk yield, somatic-cell count, fat and protein in dairy sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 15371542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikonen, T, Ahlfors, K, Kempe, R, Ojala, M, Routtinen, O 1999. Genetic parameters for the milk coagulation properties and prevalence of noncoagulating milk in Finnish dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 205214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikonen, T, Morri, S, Tyrisevä, AM, Ruottinen, O, Ojala, M 2004. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between milk coagulation properties, milk production traits, somatic cell count, casein content, and pH of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 458467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, G, Arazi, A, Pinsky, N, Halachmi, I, Schmilovitz, Z, Aizinbud, E, Maltz, E 2007. Current and near term technologies for automated recording of animal data for precision dairy farming. Journal of Animal Science 85 (suppl. 1), 377.Google Scholar
Kosikowski, FV, Mistry, VV 1997. Cheddar cheese and related types. In Cheese and fermented milk foods, (ed. FV Kosikowski and VV Mistry) pp. 90107. FV Kosikowski, L.L.C., Westport, CT, USA.Google Scholar
Le Roux, Y, Laurent, F, Moussaoui, F 2003. Polymorphonuclear proteolytic activity and milk composition change. Veterinary Research 34, 629645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leigh, JA, Lincoln, RA 1997. Streptococcus uberis acquires plasmin activity following growth in the presence of bovine plasminogen through the action of its specific plasminogen activator. FEMS Microbiology Letters 154, 123129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, G, Krifucks, O, Merin, U, Lavi, Y, Silanikove, N 2006. Interactions between bacteria type, proteolysis of casein and physico-chemical properties of bovine milk. International Dairy Journal 16, 648654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, G, Chaffer, M, Shamay, A, Shapiro, F, Merin, U, Ezra, E, Saran, A, Silanikove, N 2004a. Changes in milk composition as affected by subclinical mastitis in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 4652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, G, Merin, U, Silanikove, N 2004b. Changes in milk composition as affected by subclinical mastitis in goats. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 17191726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, G, Merin, U, Silanikove, N 2011a. Effects of glandular bacterial infection and stage of lactation on milk clotting parameters: comparison among cows, goats and sheep. International Dairy Journal 21, 279285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, G, Lavi, Y, Merin, U, Lemberskiy-Kuzin, L, Katz, G 2011b. On-line evaluation of milk quality according to coagulation properties for its optimal distribution for industrial applications. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 29232932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malacarne, M, Summer, A, Fossa, E, Formaggioni, P, Franceschi, P, Pecorari, M, Mariani, P 2006. Composition, coagulation properties and Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese yield of Italian Brown and Italian Friesian herd milks. Journal of Dairy Research 73, 171177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melilli, C, Lynch, JM, Caprino, S, Barbano, DM, Licitra, G, Cappa, A 2002. An empirical method for prediction of cheese yield. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 26992704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merin, U, Fleminger, G, Komanovsky, J, Silanikove, N, Bernstein, S, Leitner, G 2008. Subclinical udder infection with Streptococcus dysgalactiae impairs milk coagulation, properties: the emerging role of proteose-petones. Dairy Science and Technology 88, 407419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moussaoui, F, Vangroenweghe, F, Haddadi, K, Le Roux, Y, Laurent, F, Duchateau, L, Burvenich, C 2004. Proteolysis in milk during experimental Escherichia coli mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 29232931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ISO 2002. Milk-determination of the casein nitrogen content. ISO/DIS 17997/IDF 29. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Oliver, SP, Gonzalez, RN, Hogan, JS, Jayarao, BM, Owens, WE 2004. Microbiological procedures for the diagnosis of bovine udder infection and determination of milk quality, 4th edition. The National Mastitis Council, Inc., Verona, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Penasa, M, Cassandro, M, Pretto, D, De Marchi, M, Comin, A, Chessa, S, Dal Zotto, R, Bittante, G 2010. Influence of composite casein genotypes on additive genetic variation of milk production traits and coagulation properties in Holstein-Friesian cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 33463349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitkälä, A, Haveri, M, Pyörälä, S, Myllys, V, Honkanen-Buzalski, T 2004. Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001 – prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 24332441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riddell-Lawrence, S, Hicks, CL 1989. Effect of curd firmness on stirred curd cheese yield. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 313321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampimon, O, Barkema, HW, Berends, I, Sol, J, Lam, T 2009. Prevalence of intramammary infection in Dutch dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Research 76, 129136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute 2000. JMP user's guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Silanikove, N, Shapiro, F, Leitner, G 2005. Role of xanthine oxidase, lactoperoxidase and NO in the innate immune system of mammary secretion during active involution in dairy cows: manipulation with casein hydrolysates. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 38, 11391151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silanikove, N, Shapiro, F, Shinder, D 2009. Acute heat stress brings down milk secretion in dairy cows by up-regulating the activity of the milk-borne negative feedback regulatory system. BMC Physiology 9, 13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vallas, M, Bovenhuis, H, Kaart, T, Pärna, K, Kiiman, H, Pärna, E 2010. Genetic parameters for milk coagulation properties in Estonian Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 37893796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Berg, MG, van den Berg, G, van Boekel, MAJS 1996. Mass transfer processes involved in Gouda cheese manufacture, in relation to casein and yield. Netherland Milk and Dairy Journal 50, 501540.Google Scholar
Verdier-Metz, I, Coulon, JB, Pradel, P 2001. Relationship between milk fat and protein contents and cheese yield. Animal Research 50, 365371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedholm, A, Larsen, LB, Lindmark-Månsson, H, Karlsson, AH, Andrén, A 2006. Effect of protein composition on the cheese-making properties of milk from individual dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 32963305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed