Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T23:04:24.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prevalence and risk factors for gastric ulceration in pigs slaughtered at 170 kg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2017

F. Gottardo ,
A. Scollo ,
B. Contiero ,
M. Bottacini ,
C. Mazzoni  and
S. A. Edwards
F. Gottardo*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health-MAPS, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
A. Scollo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health-MAPS, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy Suivet s.n.c, Via Martiri della Bettola, 67/8, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
B. Contiero
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health-MAPS, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
M. Bottacini
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health-MAPS, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
C. Mazzoni
Affiliation:
Suivet s.n.c, Via Martiri della Bettola, 67/8, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
S. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Oesophago-gastric ulcers (OGU) are a production and welfare problem in pigs. Stomach condition was scored for 22 551 pigs in 228 batches over a 7-month period at an abattoir in Italy processing heavy pigs for ham production. Mild or severe ulceration was observed in 20.7% of pigs, of which 13% had scar tissue. Variation between batches was high (0% to 36% prevalence of severe ulcers) and showed a significant effect of farm of origin (P<0.001). Overnight lairage increased the prevalence of mild ulcers (P<0.001), but not severe or scarred ulcers. Scarred ulcers increased in the hottest summer months. Prevalence of ulcers showed only few and weak correlations at batch level with pathologies of the pleura, lungs and liver, but a strong correlation with on-farm mortality of the batch. Analysis of farm risk factors for OGU was assessed by questionnaire with a response rate of 17% of farms. Risk factors retained in a multivariable model included a protective effect of anthelmintic treatment (risk ratio (RR)=5.1, P=0.03), increased risk in farms using Mycoplasma vaccination (RR=5.6, P=0.04) and a tendency for association with type of flooring (P=0.06). Univariable analyses also highlighted possible influences of other stress-inducing factors including lack of enrichment objects and mixing of pigs during fattening, suggesting that the role of on-farm stressors merits further investigation. It is concluded that abattoir screening of OGU in future programmes for the assessment of well-being on farm should encompass only severe lesions and scarring, and results be returned to farmers to facilitate improvement of production and welfare.

Keywords

gastric ulcerhealthpigrisk factorstress
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 11 , November 2017 , pp. 2010 - 2018
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amory, JR, Mackenzie, AM and Pearce, GP 2006. Factors in the housing environment of finisher pigs associated with the development of gastric ulcers. Veterinary Record 158, 260–264.Google Scholar
Caswell, JL and Williams, KJ 2013. Respiratory system. In Jubb, Kennedy & Palmer’s pathology of domestic animals, volume 2, 6th edition (ed. I Maxie and M Grant), pp. 465–591. Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, USA.Google Scholar
Davies, PR, Grass, JJ, Marsh, WE, Bahnson, PB and Dial, GD 1994. Time of slaughter affects prevalence of lesions of the pars osephagea of pigs. In Proceedings of the 13th International Pig Veterinary Congress, 26–30 June, Bangkok, Thailand, 471pp.Google Scholar
Day, JEL, Spoolder, HAM, Burfoot, A, Chamberlain, HL and Edwards, SA 2002. The separate and interactive effects of handling and environmental enrichment on the behaviour and welfare of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, IC, Lambooij, E, Korte, SM, Blokhuis, HJ and Koolhaas, JM 1999. Mixing induces long-term hyperthermia in growing pigs. Animal Science 69, 601–605.Google Scholar
de Oliveira, SJ, Bernardi, RT, Vogt, FI, Scartezzini, M, Hepp, D and Lunge, VR 2010. Gastric ulcers in fattening pigs: isolation of Arcobacter spp. from stomachs with different severity of lesions. Acta Scientiae Veterinari 38, 351–356.Google Scholar
Di Martino, G, Capello, K, Scollo, A, Gottardo, F, Stefani, AL, Rampin, F, Schiavon, E, Marangon, S and Bonfanti, L 2013. Continuous straw provision reduces prevalence of oesophago-gastric ulcer in pigs slaughtered at 170 kg (heavy pigs). Research in Veterinary Science 95, 1271–1273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dottori, M, Nigrelli, AD, Bonilauri, P, Merialdi, G, Gozio, S and Cominotti, F 2007. Proposta per un nuovo sistema di punteggiatura delle pleuriti suine in sede di macellazione: La griglia SPES (slaughterhouse pleurisy evaluation system). Large Animal Review 13, 161–165.Google Scholar
Dybkjaer, L, Vraa-Andersen, L, Paisley, LG, Moller, K, Christensen, G and Agger, JF 1994. Associations between behaviour and stomach lesions in slaughter pigs. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 19, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geverink, NA, Schouten, WGP, Gort, G and Wiegant, VM 2003. Individual differences in behaviour, physiology and pathology in breeding gilts housed in groups or stalls. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, JH 2012. Internal parasites: helminths. In Diseases of swine, 10th edition (ed. JJ Zimmerman, LA Karriker, A Ramirez, KJ Schwartz and GW Stevenson), pp. 908–920. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Herskin, MS, Jensen, HE, Jespersen, A, Forkman, B, Jensen, MB, Canibe, N and Pedersen, LJ 2016. Impact of the amount of straw provided to pigs kept in intensive production conditions on the occurrence and severity of gastric ulceration at slaughter. Research in Veterinary Science 104, 200–206.Google Scholar
Hessing, MJC, Geudeke, MJ, Scheepens, CJM, Tielen, MJM, Schouten, WGP and Wiepkema, PR 1992. Mucosal lesions in the pars-oesophagea in pigs – prevalence and influence of stress. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 117, 445–450.Google Scholar
Jensen, KH, Pedersen, LJ, Nielsen, EK, Heller, KE, Ladewig, J and Jørgensen, E 1996. Intermittent stress in pigs: effects on behaviour, pituitary-adrenocortical axis, growth, and gastric ulceration. Physiology & Behavior 59, 741–748.Google Scholar
Lawrence, BV, Anderson, DB, Adeola, O and Cline, TR 1998. Changes in pars esophageal tissue appearance of the porcine stomach in response to transportation, feed deprivation, and diet composition. Journal of Animal Science 76, 788–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madec, F and Derrien, H 1981. Fréquence, intensité et localisation des lesions pulmonaires chez le porc charcutier: résultats d’une première série d’observations en abattoir. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 13, 231–236.Google Scholar
McNutt, LA, Wu, C, Xue, X and Hafner, JP 2003. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology 157, 940–943.Google Scholar
Melnichouk, SI 2002. Mortality associated with gastric ulceration in swine. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 43, 223–225.Google ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, EK and Ingvartsen, KL 2000. Effect of cereal type, disintegration method and pelleting on stomach content, weight and ulcers and performance in growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 66, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overmier, JB and Murison, R 2000. Anxiety and helplessness in the face of stress predisposes, precipitates, and sustains gastric ulceration. Behavioural Brain Research 110, 161–174.Google Scholar
Ramis, G, Gómez, S, Pallarés, FJ and Muñoz, A 2005. Comparison of the severity of esophagogastric, lung and limb lesions at slaughter in pigs reared under standard and enriched conditions. Animal Welfare 14, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, NA, Muggenburg, BA, Kowalczyk, T, Hoekstra, WG and Grummer, RH 1966. Effects of corn, wheat, oats and alfalfa leaf meal on the development of gastric ulcers in swine. Journal of Animal Science 25, 21–24.Google Scholar
Robertson, ID, Accioly, JM, Moore, KM, Driesen, SJ, Pethick, DW and Hampson, DJ 2002. Risk factors for gastric ulcers in Australian pigs at slaughter. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 53, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruis, MAW, de Groot, J, Te Brake, JHA, Ekkel, ED, van de Burgwal, JA, Erkens, JHF, Engel, B, Buist, WG, Blokhuis, HJ and Koolhaas, JM 2001. Behavioral and physiological consequences of acute social defeat in growing gilts: effects of the social environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70, 201–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, K, Chennells, DJ, Campbell, FM, Hunt, B, Armstrong, D, Taylor, L, Gill, BP and Edwards, SA 2006. The welfare of finishing pigs in two contrasting housing systems: fully slatted versus straw bedded accommodation. Livestock Science 103, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, K, Taylor, L, Gill, BP and Edwards, SA 2009. Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of finishing pigs in two different housing systems: 3. Hanging toy v. rootable toy of the same material. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, WJ and Edwards, SA 1996. Ulceration of the pars oesophagea – the role of a factor in wheat. Pig Journal 36, 194–200.Google Scholar
Straw, B, Henry, S, Nelsson, J, Doster, A, Moxley, R, Rogers, D and Webb, D 1994. Prevalence of gastric ulcers in normal, sick and feed-deprived pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72 (suppl.), 55.Google Scholar
Swaby, H and Gregory, NG 2012. A note on the frequency of gastric ulcers detected during post-mortem examination at a pig abattoir. Meat Science 90, 269–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, JR and Friendship, RM 2012. Digestive system. In Diseases of swine, 10th edition (ed. JJ Zimmerman, LA Karriker, A Ramirez, KJ Schwartz and GW Stevenson), pp. 208–211. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Wondra, KJ, Hancock, JD, Behnke, KC, Hines, RH and Stark, CR 1995. Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 73, 757–763.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gottardo supplementary material

Gottardo supplementary material 1

Download Gottardo supplementary material(File)
File 607.7 KB