Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:44:31.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preference by sheep for endophyte-infected tall fescue grown adjacent to or at a distance from alfalfa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2014

M. A. Friend ,
F. D. Provenza  and
J. J. Villalba
M. A. Friend
Affiliation:
Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW DPI and Charles Sturt University), Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
F. D. Provenza
Affiliation:
Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5230, USA
J. J. Villalba*
Affiliation:
Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5230, USA
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to assess preference by sheep for endophyte-infected tall fescue growing in monoculture at least 5 m away from alfalfa (fescue-middle (FM)) over endophyte-infected tall fescue growing adjacent (0.2 to 1 m; fescue–alfalfa (FA)) to alfalfa (FA), and the effect of legume scent on preference for endophyte-infected tall fescue. In Experiment 1, 10 six-month-old lambs were offered for 12 days a choice of freshly harvested FA and FM. On days 13 and 14, lambs were offered the same choice, except cages (to allow access only to scent) containing freshly harvested alfalfa were put in the feeders containing FA, whereas cages containing freshly harvested FM were included with the feeders containing FM. Forage intake was measured 1 h after feeding and at three consecutive 2-h intervals thereafter. FA contained greater (P<0.002) concentrations of the alkaloid ergovaline (360±27 ppm) and CP (8±0.4%) than FM (219±27 ppm and 6±0.4%, respectively). Lambs preferred (P<0.05) FA to FM during the 1st hour of feeding, but the differences became smaller and disappeared in later feeding periods (P<0.005). Lambs offered FA with alfalfa scent or FM with FM scent preferred (P<0.05) FA but only on the 2nd day. In Experiment 2, 10 six-month-old lambs were offered a choice of FM with cages (to allow access only to scent) containing freshly harvested alfalfa or FM for 8 days. During the following 4 days, FM in the cages was replaced with freshly harvested sainfoin. Preference was greater (P<0.05) for FM offered with alfalfa scent than for FM offered with FM scent only on days 4 and 8. When lambs were offered FM with alfalfa or sainfoin in cages, they preferred (P<0.05) tall fescue with sainfoin scent over fescue with alfalfa scent, but intake was variable across hours and days (P<0.001). It is concluded that (1) lambs adjusted their intake of and preference for FA and FM over successive feeding bouts within each day, likely owing to an attempt to balance intakes of nutrients and alkaloids and (2) olfactory cues influenced preference, but to a lesser extent than nutrients and alkaloids in endophyte-infected tall fescue.

Keywords

ergovalinesainfoinsheepdiet selectionpreference
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , March 2015 , pp. 516 - 525
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, CG, Paterson, JA, Tate, JL and Kerley, MS 1993a. The effects of endophyte-infected tall fescue consumption on diet utilization and thermal regulation in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 71, 164–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aldrich, CG, Rhodes, MT, Miner, JL, Kerley, MS and Paterson, JA 1993b. The effects of endophyte-infected tall fescue consumption and use of a dopamine antagonist on intake, digestibility, body temperature, and blood constituents in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 71, 158–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arechavaleta, M, Bacon, CW, Plattner, RD, Hoveland, CS and Radcliffe, DE 1992. Accumulation of ergopeptide alkaloids in symbiotic tall fescue grown under deficits of soil water and nitrogen fertilizer. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58, 857–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atsatt, PR and O’Dowd, DJ 1976. Plant defense guilds. Science 193, 24–29.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official methods of analysis, vol. 1, AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Augner, M and Bernays, E 1998. Plant defence signals and Batesian mimicry. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 667–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, A, Villalba, JJ and Ipharraguerre, IR 2012. Interactions between mild nutrient imbalance and taste preferences in young ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1015–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacon, CW and Siegel, MR 1988. Endophyte parasitism of tall fescue. Journal of Production Agriculture 1, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, CW, Porter, JK, Robbins, JD and Luttrell, ES 1977. Epichloe typhina from toxic tall fescue grasses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 34, 576–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazely, DR and Ensor, CV 1989. Discrimination learning in sheep with cues varying in brightness and hue. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, M, Maughan, B and Villalba, JJ 2013. Preference for tannin-containing supplements by sheep consuming endophyte-infected tall fescue hay. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3445–3456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, JP, Chapin, FS III and Klein, DR 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40, 357–368.Google Scholar
Burns, JC and Chamblee, DS 1979. Adaptation. In Tall fescue, American Society of Agronomy Monographs. 20 (ed. RC Buckner and LP Bush), pp. 9–30. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Catanese, F, Distel, RA and Villalba, JJ 2014. Effects of supplementing endophyte-infected tall fescue with sainfoin and polyethylene glycol on the physiology and ingestive behavior of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 92, 744–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clay, K 1988. Fungal endophytes of grasses: a defensive mutualism between plants and fungi. Ecology 69, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearing, MD, Mangione, AM and Karasov, WH 2001. Plant secondary compounds as diuretics: an overlooked consequence. American Zoologist 41, 890–901.Google Scholar
Duncan, AJ, Hartley, SE and Iason, GR 1994. Fine scale discrimination of forage quality by sheep offered a soya-bean meal or barley supplement while grazing a nitrogen-fertilized heather (Calluna vulgaris) mosaic. The Journal of Agricultural Science 123, 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, S and Loudon, A 1987. Effects of monoterpene odors on food selection by red deer calves (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Chemical Ecology 13, 1343–1349.Google Scholar
Estell, RE 2010. Coping with shrub secondary metabolites by ruminants. Small Ruminant Research 94, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favreau-Peigné, A, Baumont, R and Ginane, C 2013. Food sensory characteristics: their unconsidered roles in the feeding behaviour of domestic ruminants. Animal 7, 806–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foley, WJ, McLean, S and Cork, SJ 1995. Consequences of biotransformation of plant secondary metabolites on acid-base metabolism in mammals – a final common pathway. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 721–743.Google Scholar
Ginane, C and Dumont, B 2011. Do sheep (Ovis aries) categorize plant species according to botanical family? Animal Cognition 14, 369–376.Google Scholar
Goatcher, WD and Church, DC 1970. Taste responses in ruminants. 3. Reactions of pygmy goats, normal goats, sheep and cattle to sucrose and sodium chloride. Journal of Animal Science 31, 364–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hovermale, JT and Craig, AM 2001. Correlation of ergovaline and lolitrem B levels in endophyte-infected perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 13, 323–327.Google Scholar
Hubbard, CL 1995. Responses of sheep to variation in endo-phyte infection of Festuca rubra. MS Thesis, York University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Hutchings, MR, Judge, J, Gordon, IJ, Athanasiadou, S and Kyriazakis, I 2006. Use of trade-off theory to advance understanding of herbivore–parasite interactions. Mammalian Reviews 36, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illius, AW and Jessop, NS 1995. Modeling metabolic costs of allelochemical ingestion by foraging herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 693–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaussaud, J, Durix, A, Videmann, B, Vigie, A and Bony, S 1998. Rapid analysis of ergovaline in ovine plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection. Journal of Chromatography A 8, 147–153.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I and Oldham, JD 1993. Diet selection in sheep: the ability of growing lambs to select a diet that meets their crude protein (nitrogen x 6.25) requirements. British Journal of Nutrition 69, 617–629.Google Scholar
Launchbaugh, KL and Provenza, FD 1993. Can plants practice mimicry to avoid grazing by mammalian herbivores? Oikos 66, 501–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, T, Provenza, FD and Villalba, JJ 2008. Sheep foraging behavior in response to interactions among alkaloids, tannins and saponins. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88, 824–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, TD, Provenza, FD, Villalba, JJ and Wiedmeier, RD 2012. Phytochemical complementarities among endophyte-infected tall fescue, reed canarygrass, birdsfoot trefoil, and alfalfa affect cattle foraging. Animal 6, 676–682.Google Scholar
Mayland, HF, Flath, RA and Shewmaker, GE 1997. Volatiles from fresh and air-dried vegetative tissues of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.): relationship to cattle preference. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 45, 2204–2210.Google Scholar
Merchen, NR and Bourquin, LD 1994. Processes of digestion and factors influencing digestion and forage-based diets by ruminants. In Forage quality. Evaluation and utilization (ed. GC Fahey), pp. 564–612. ASA CSSA SSSA, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Owens, J, Provenza, FD, Wiedmeier, RD and Villalba, JJ 2012. Supplementing endophyte-infected tall fescue or reed canarygrass with alfalfa or birdsfoot trefoil increases forage intake and digestibility by sheep. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 92, 987–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, CW, Grigsby, KN, Aldrich, CG, Paterson, JA, Lipsey, RJ, Kerley, MS and Garner, GB 1992. Performance, forage utilization, and ergovaline consumption by beef cows grazing endophyte fungus infected tall fescue, endophyte tall fescue, or orchardgrass pastures. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1550–1561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfister, JA, Provenza, FD, Manners, GD, Gardner, DR and Ralphs, MH 1997. Tall larkspur ingestion: can cattle regulate intake below toxic levels? Journal of Chemical Ecology 23, 759–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popay, AJ 2009. Insect herbivory and defensive mutualisms between plants and fungi. In Defensive mutualism in microbial symbiosis (ed. JF Jr White and MS Torres), pp. 347–366. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
Popay, AJ, Jensen, JG and Cooper, BM 2005. The effect of non-toxic endophytes in tall fescue on two major insect pests. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 67, 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenza, FD 1996. Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2010–2020.Google Scholar
Provenza, FD and Balph, DF 1990. Applicability of five diet-selection models to various foraging challenges ruminants encounters. In Behavioural mechanisms of food selection, NATO ASI Series G: Ecological Sciences, vol. 20 (ed. RN Hughes), pp. 423–459. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenza, FD, Kimball, BA and Villalba, JJ 2000. Role of odor, taste, and toxicity in the food preferences of lambs: implications for mimicry in plants. Oikos 88, 424–432.Google Scholar
Provenza, FD, Ortega-Reyes, L, Scott, CB, Lynch, JJ and Burritt, EA 1994. Antiemetic drugs attenuate food aversions in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 72, 1989–1994.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S, Parsons, AJ, Bassett, S, Christensen, MJ, Hume, DE, Johnson, LJ, Johnson, RD, Simpson, WR, Stacke, C, Voisey, CR, Xue, H and Newman, JA 2007. High nitrogen supply and carbohydrate content reduce fungal endophyte and alkaloid concentration in Lolium perenne . New Physiologist 173, 787–797.Google Scholar
Rottinghaus, GE, Garner, GB, Cornell, CN and Ellis, JL 1991. HPLC method for quantitating ergovaline in endophyte-infested tall fescue: seasonal variation of ergovaline levels in stems with leaf sheaths, leaf blades, and seed heads. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 39, 112–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scehovic, J, Poisson, C and Gillet, M 1985. Palatability and organoleptic characteristics of grasses. I.Comparison between ryegrass and tall fescue. Agronomie 5, 347–354.Google Scholar
Squires, VR 1988. Water and its functions, regulation and comparative use by ruminant livestock. In The ruminant animal. Digestive physiology and nutrition (ed. DC Church), pp. 217–226. Waveland Press Inc., Prospect Heights, IL, USA.Google Scholar
van Santen, E 1992. Animal preference of tall fescue during reproductive growth in the spring. Agronomy Journal 84, 979–982.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ 1994. Nutritional ecology of the rumiannt. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 476pp.Google Scholar
Villalba, JJ and Provenza, FD 1997. Preference for flavored foods by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administrations of nitrogen. British Journal of Nutrition 78, 545–561.Google Scholar
Villalba, JJ and Provenza, FD 1999. Nutrient-specific preferences by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch, casein, and water. Journal of Animal Science 77, 378–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, JJ and Provenza, FD 2000. Roles of novelty, generalization and postingestive feedback in the recognition of foods by lambs. Journal of Animal Science 78, 3060–3069.Google Scholar
Vilallba, JJ and Provenza, FD 2005. Foraging in chemically diverse environments: energy, protein, and alternative foods influence ingestion of plant secondary metabolites by lambs. Journal of Chemical Ecology 31, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD and Banner, RE 2002a. Influence of macronutrients and activated charcoal on utilization of sagebrush by sheep and goats. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2099–2109.Google Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD and Bryant, JP 2002b. Consequences of the interaction between nutrients and plant secondary metabolites on herbivore selectivity: benefits or detriments for plants? Oikos 97, 282–292.Google Scholar
Vilallba, JJ, Provenza, FD and Hall, JO 2008. Learned appetites for calcium, phosphorus, and sodium in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 86, 738–747.Google Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD, Clemensen, AK, Larsen, R and Juhnke, J 2011. Preference for diverse pastures by sheep in response to intraruminal administrations of tannins, saponins and alkaloids. Grass and Forage Science 66, 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar