Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:38:58.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction of enteric methane emissions from Holstein dairy cows fed various forage sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2015

D. E. Rico
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, 2425 rue de l’Agriculture, Québec, QC, Canada, G1V 0A6
P. Y. Chouinard
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, 2425 rue de l’Agriculture, Québec, QC, Canada, G1V 0A6
F. Hassanat
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, 2000 College Street, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, J1M 0C8
C. Benchaar
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, 2000 College Street, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, J1M 0C8
R. Gervais*
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, 2425 rue de l’Agriculture, Québec, QC, Canada, G1V 0A6
*
Get access

Abstract

Milk fatty acid (FA) profile has been previously used as a predictor of enteric CH4 output in dairy cows fed diets supplemented with plant oils, which can potentially impact ruminal fermentation. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationships between milk FA and enteric CH4 emissions in lactating dairy cows fed different types of forages in the context of commonly fed diets. A total of 81 observations from three separate 3×3 Latin square design (32-day periods) experiments including a total of 27 lactating cows (96±27 days in milk; mean±SD) were used. Dietary forages were included at 60% of ration dry matter and were as follows: (1) 100% corn silage, (2) 100% alfalfa silage, (3) 100% barley silage, (4) 100% timothy silage, (5) 50 : 50 mix of corn and alfalfa silages, (6) 50 : 50 mix of barley and corn silages and (7) 50 : 50 mix of timothy and alfalfa silages. Enteric CH4 output was measured using respiration chambers during 3 consecutive days. Milk was sampled during the last 7 days of each period and analyzed for components and FA profile. Test variables included dry matter intake (DMI; kg/day), NDF (%), ether extract (%), milk yield (kg/day), milk components (%) and individual milk FA (% of total FA). Candidate multivariate models were obtained using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and Least-Angle Regression methods based on the Schwarz Bayesian Criterion. Data were then fitted into a random regression using the MIXED procedure including the random effects of cow, period and study. A positive correlation was observed between CH4 and DMI (r=0.59, P<0.001), whereas negative associations were observed between CH4 and cis9-17:1 (r=−0.58, P<0.001), and trans8, cis13-18:2 (r=−0.51, P<0.001). Three different candidate models were selected and the best fit candidate model predicted CH4 with a coefficient of determination of 0.84 after correction for cow, period and study effects and was: CH4 (g/day)=319.7−57.4×15:0−13.8×cis9-17:1−39.5×trans10-18:1−59.9×cis11-18:1−253.1×trans8, cis12-18:2−642.7×trans8, cis13-18:2−195.7×trans11, cis15-18:2+16.5×DMI. Overall and linear prediction biases of all models were not significant (P>0.19). Milk FA profile and DMI can be used to predict CH4 emissions in dairy cows across a wide range of dietary forage sources.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauman, DE and Griinari, JM 2001. Regulation and nutritional manipulation of milk fat: low-fat milk syndrome. Livestock Production Science 70, 1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benchaar, C, Hassanat, F, Gervais, R, Chouinard, PY, Petit, HV and Masse, DI 2014. Methane production, digestion, ruminal fermentation, nitrogen balance, and milk production of cows fed corn silage- or barley silage-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 961974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benchaar, C, Rivest, J, Pomar, C and Chiquette, J 1998. Prediction of methane production from dairy cows using existing mechanistic models and regression equations. Journal of Animal Science 76, 617627.Google Scholar
Bibby, J and Toutenburg, H 1977. Prediction and improved estimation in linear models. John Wiley & Sons, London, UK.Google Scholar
Boivin, M, Gervais, R and Chouinard, PY 2013. Effect of grain and forage fractions of corn silage on milk production and composition in dairy cows. Animal 7, 245254.Google Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals, vol. 1, 2nd edition, Chapter IV. Farm animal facilities and environment (ed. ED Olfert, BM Cross and AA McWilliam), pp. 6569. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
Castro-Montoya, JM, Bhagwat, AM, Peiren, N, De Campeneere, S, De Baets, B and Fievez, V 2011. Relationships between odd- and branched-chain fatty acid profiles in milk and calculated enteric methane proportion for lactating dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 596602.Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Martin, C, Rouel, J and Doreau, M 2009. Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed whole crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil, and their relationship with methane output. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 51995211.Google Scholar
Chouinard, PY, Lévesque, J, Girard, V and Brisson, GJ 1997. Dietary soybeans extruded at different temperatures: milk composition and in situ fatty acid reactions. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 29132924.Google Scholar
Chung, YH, He, ML, McGinn, SM, McAllister, TA and Beauchemin, KA 2011. Linseed suppresses enteric methane emissions from cattle fed barley silage, but not from those fed grass hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 321329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, J, van Zijderveld, SM, Apajalahti, JA, Bannink, A, Gerrits, WJJ, Newbold, JR, Perdok, HB and Berends, H 2011. Relationships between methane production and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 590595.Google Scholar
Efron, B, Johnstone, I, Hastie, T and Tibshirani, R 2004. Least angle regression. Annals of Statistics 32, 407499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fievez, V, Colman, E, Castro-Montoya, JM, Stefanov, I and Vlaeminck, B 2012. Milk odd- and branched-chain fatty acids as biomarkers of rumen function – an update. Animal Feed Science and Technology 172, 5165.Google Scholar
Fievez, V, Vlaeminck, B, Dhanoa, MS and Dewhurst, RJ 2003. Use of principal component analysis to investigate the origin of heptadecenoic and conjugated linoleic acids in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 40474053.Google Scholar
French, EA, Bertics, SJ and Armentano, LE 2012. Rumen and milk odd- and branched-chain fatty acid proportions are minimally influenced by ruminal volatile fatty acid infusions. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 20152026.Google Scholar
Fuentes, MC, Calsamiglia, S, Cardozo, PW and Vlaeminck, B 2009. Effect of pH and level of concentrate in the diet on the production of biohydrogenation intermediates in a dual-flow continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 44564466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemeister, H, Franzen, M, Barth, CA and Precht, D 1991. α-Linolenic acid transfer into milk fat and its elongation by cows. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 93, 387391.Google Scholar
Hassanat, F, Gervais, R, Julien, C, Masse, DI, Lettat, A, Chouinard, PY, Petit, HV and Benchaar, C 2013. Replacing alfalfa silage with corn silage in dairy cow diets: effects on enteric methane production, ruminal fermentation, digestion, N balance, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 45534567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassanat, F, Gervais, R, Masse, DI, Petit, HV and Benchaar, C 2014. Methane production, nutrient digestion, ruminal fermentation, N balance, and milk production of cows fed timothy silage- or alfalfa silage-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 64636474.Google Scholar
Jensen, RG 2002. The composition of bovine milk lipids: January 1995 to December 2000. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 295350.Google Scholar
Johnson, KA and Johnson, DE 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 24832492.Google Scholar
Kebreab, E, Johnson, KA, Archibeque, SL, Pape, D and Wirth, T 2008. Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from United States dairy and feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86, 27382748.Google Scholar
Kramer, JK, Hernandez, M, Cruz-Hernandez, C, Kraft, J and Dugan, ME 2008. Combining results of two GC separations partly achieves determination of all cis and trans 16:1, 18:1, 18:2 and 18:3 except CLA isomers of milk fat as demonstrated using Ag-ion SPE fractionation. Lipids 43, 259273.Google Scholar
Lourenço, M, Ramos-Morales, E and Wallace, RJ 2010. The role of microbes in rumen lipolysis and biohydrogenation and their manipulation. Animal 4, 10081023.Google Scholar
Maia, MR, Chaudhary, LC, Figueres, L and Wallace, RJ 2007. Metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids and their toxicity to the microflora of the rumen. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 91, 303314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, R, McGinn, SM and Beauchemin, KA 2011. Prediction of enteric methane output from milk fatty acid concentrations and rumen fermentation parameters in dairy cows fed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 60576068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, AR, Jouany, JP and Newbold, J 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annales de Zootechnie 49, 231253.Google Scholar
Patra, AK 2013. The effect of dietary fats on methane emissions, and its other effects on digestibility, rumen fermentation and lactation performance in cattle: a meta-analysis. Livestock Science 155, 244254.Google Scholar
Precht, D, Molkentin, J, McGuirre, MA, Jensen, RG and McGuire, MK 2001. Overestimates of oleic and linoleic acid contents in materials containing trans fatty acids and analyzed with short packed gas chromatographic columns. Lipids 36, 213216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiu, X, Eastridge, ML, Griswold, KE and Firkins, JL 2004. Effects of substrate, passage rate, and pH in continuous culture on flows of conjugated linoleic acid and trans C18:1. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 34733479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramin, M and Huhtanen, P 2013. Development of equations for predicting methane emissions from ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 24762493.Google Scholar
Rico, DE and Harvatine, KJ 2013. Induction of and recovery from milk fat depression occurs progressively in dairy cows switched between diets that differ in fiber and oil concentration. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 66216630.Google Scholar
Sauer, FD, Fellner, V, Kinsman, R, Kramer, JK, Jackson, HA, Lee, AJ and Chen, S 1998. Methane output and lactation response in Holstein cattle with monensin or unsaturated fat added to the diet. Journal of Animal Science 76, 906914.Google Scholar
St-Pierre, NR 2003. Reassessment of biases in predicted nitrogen flows to the duodenum by NRC 2001. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 344350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibshirani, R 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 58, 267288.Google Scholar
van Lingen, HJ, Crompton, LA, Hendriks, WH, Reynolds, CK and Dijkstra, J 2014. Meta-analysis of relationships between enteric methane yield and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 71157132.Google Scholar
Vlaeminck, B and Fievez, V 2005. Milk odd and branched chain fatty acids to predict ruminal methanogenesis in dairy cows. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences 70, 4347.Google ScholarPubMed
Vlaeminck, B, Fievez, V, Cabrita, ARJ, Fonseca, AJM and Dewhurst, RJ 2006. Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131, 389417.Google Scholar
Weimer, PJ, Stevenson, DM and Mertens, DR 2010. Shifts in bacterial community composition in the rumen of lactating dairy cows under milk fat-depressing conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 265278.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rico supplementary material S1

Rico supplementary material

Download Rico supplementary material S1(File)
File 222.3 KB