Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:50:00.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-weaning feed efficiency decreased in progeny of higher milk yielding beef cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

J. T. Mulliniks ,
S. R. Edwards ,
J. D. Hobbs ,
Z. D. McFarlane  and
E. R. Cope
J. T. Mulliniks*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 38571, USA
S. R. Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 38571, USA
J. D. Hobbs
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 38571, USA
Z. D. McFarlane
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 38571, USA
E. R. Cope
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 38571, USA
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Current trends in the beef industry focus on selecting production traits with the purpose of maximizing calf weaning weight; however, such traits may ultimately decrease overall post-weaning productivity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of actual milk yield in mature beef cows on their offspring’s dry matter intake (DMI), BW, average daily gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and residual feed intake (RFI) during a ~75-day backgrounding feeding trial. A period of 24-h milk production was measured with a modified weigh-suckle-weigh technique using a milking machine. After milking, cows were retrospectively classified as one of three milk yield groups: Lower (6.57±1.21 kg), Moderate (9.02±0.60 kg) or Higher (11.97±1.46 kg). Calves from Moderate and Higher milk yielding dams had greater (P<0.01) BW from day 0 until day 75 at the end of the backgrounding feeding phase; however, day 75 BW were not different (P=0.36) between Lower and Moderate calves. Body weight gain was greater (P=0.05) for Lower and Moderate calves from the day 0 BW to day 35 BW compared with Higher calves. Overall DMI was lower (P=0.03) in offspring from Lower and Moderate cows compared with their Higher milking counterparts. With the decreased DMI, FCR was lower (P=0.03) from day 0 to day 35 in calves from Lower and Moderate milk yielding dams. In addition, overall FCR was lower (P=0.02) in calves from Lower and Moderate milk yielding dams compared with calves from Higher milk yielding dams. However, calving of Lower milk yielding dams had an increased (P=0.04) efficiency from a negative RFI value compared with calves from Moderate and Higher milking dams. Results from this study suggest that increased milk production in beef cows decreases feed efficiency during a 75-day post-weaning, backgrounding period of progeny.

Keywords

beef cattlefeed efficiencyfeed intakemilk productionpost-weaning growth
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , February 2018 , pp. 275 - 279
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansotegui, RP, Havstad, KM, Wallace, JD and Hallford, DM 1991. Effects of milk intake on forage intake and performance of suckling range calves. Journal of Animal Science 69, 899–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, RL, Mcleod, KR, Klotz, JL and Heitmann, RN 2004. Rumen development, intestinal growth and hepatic metabolism in the pre- and postweaning ruminant. Journal of Dairy Science 87, E55–E65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdon, RM and Brinks, JS 1987. Simulated efficiency of range beef production. I. Growth and milk production. Journal of Animal Science 65, 943–955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, MA and Dinkel, CA 1982. Efficiency to slaughter of calves from Angus, Charolais and reciprocal cross crows. Journal of Animal Science 51, 304–315.Google Scholar
Buskirk, DD, Faulkner, DB and Ireland, FA 1995. Increased postweaning gain of beef heifers enhances fertility and milk production. Journal of Animal Science 73, 937–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverdale, JA, Tyler, HD, Quigley, JD III and Brumm, JA 2004. Effect of various levels of forage and form of diet on rumen development and growth of calves. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 2554–2562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, ME, Rutledge, JJ, Cundiff, LV and Hauser, ER 1983a. Life cycle efficiency of beef production: I. Cow efficiency ratios for progeny weaned. Journal of Animal Science 57, 832–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, ME, Rutledge, JJ, Cundiff, LV and Hauser, ER 1983b. Life cycle efficiency of beef production: II. Relationship of cow efficiency ‘ratios to traits of the dam and progeny weaned. Journal of Animal Science 57, 852–866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillon, P, Berry, DP, Evan, RD, Buckley, F and Horan, B 2006. Consequences of genetic selection for increased milk production in European seasonal pasture based systems of milk production. Livestock Science 99, 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, SR, Hobbs, JD and Mulliniks, JT 2017. High milk production decreases cow-calf productivity within a highly available feed resource environment. Translational Animal Science 1, 54–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrell, CL and Jenkins, TG 1984. Energy utilization by mature, nonpregnant, nonlactating cows of different types. Journal of Animal Science 58, 234–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrell, CL and Jenkins, TG 1985. Cow type and the nutritional environment: nutritional aspects. Journal of Animal Science 61, 725–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamada, T, Maeda, S and Kameoka, K 1976. Factors influencing growth of rumen, liver, and other organs in kids weaned from milk replacers to solid foods. Journal of Dairy Science 59, 1110–1118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgson, J, Tayler, JC and Lonsdale, CR 1971. The relationship between intensity of grazing and the herbage consumption and growth of calves. Journal of the British Grassland Society 26, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, AJ, Faulkner, DB, Knipe, RK, Strohbehm, DR, Parrett, DF and Berger, LL 2001. Critical control points for profitability in the cow-calf enterprise. Professional Animal Scientist 17, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, SP, Wilton, JW and Pfeiffer, WC 1999. Effects of milk yield on biological efficiency and profit of beef production from birth to slaughter. Journal of Animal Science 77, 344–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montaño-Bermudez, M and Nielsen, MK 1990. Biological efficiency to weaning and to slaughter of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk. Journal of Animal Science 68, 2297–2309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulliniks, JT, Kemp, ME, Cox, SH, Hawkins, DE, Cibils, AF, VanLeeuwen, DM and Petersen, MK 2011. The effect of increasing amount of glucogenic precursors on reproductive performance in young postpartum range cows. Journal of Animal Science 89, 2932–2943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neville, WE and McCullough, ME 1969. Calculated energy requirements of lactating and non-lactating Hereford cows. Journal of Animal Science 29, 823–829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oijen, M, Montano-Bermudez, M and Nielsen, MK 1993. Economical and biological efficiencies of beef cattle differing in level of milk production. Journal of Animal Science 71, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tedeschi, LO and Fox, DG 2009. Predicting milk and forage intake of nursing calves. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3380–3391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, XZ, Brown, MA, Gao, FQ, Wu, JP, Lalman, DL and Liu, WJ 2009a. Relationships of milk production of beef cows to postweaning gain of the calves. Professional Animal Scientist 25, 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, YJ, Ko, M, Holligan, S, McBride, BW, Fan, MZ and Swanson, KC 2009b. Effect of dry matter intake on visceral organ mass, cellularity, and protein expression of ATP synthase, Na+/K+-ATPase, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and ubiquitin in feedlot steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 89, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterman, RC, Geary, TW, Petersen, MK and MacNeil, MD 2017. Effects of reduced in utero and post-weaning nutrition on milk yield and composition in primiparous beef cows. Animal 11, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyatt, RD, Knori, L, Gould, MB and Totusek, R 1976. Effects of two milk intake levels on performance of two calf types. Oklahoma Agriculture Experiment Station Animal Research Report No. 38, Stillwater.Google Scholar