Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:31:18.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of growing–finishing pigs fed diets containing Roundup Ready wheat (MON 71800), a non-transgenic genetically similar wheat, or conventional wheat varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

B. A. Peterson ,
Y. Hyun ,
E. P. Stanisiewski ,
G. F. Hartnell  and
M. Ellis
B. A. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Y. Hyun
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, St Louis, MO 63167, USA
E. P. Stanisiewski
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, St Louis, MO 63167, USA
G. F. Hartnell
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, St Louis, MO 63167, USA
M. Ellis*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare growth performance and carcass and meat quality characteristics of growing–finishing pigs fed diets containing Roundup Ready wheat (MON 71800), compared with the non-transgenic genetically similar parental control wheat (MON 71900), and four commercial varieties of non-transgenic wheat (HANK, Westbred 926, Express and Zeke). The study was carried out as a split-plot design with a 2 × 6 factorial arrangement of treatments (two genders and six wheat varieties). A three-phase dietary program was used; all diets were formulated with a fixed level of wheat inclusion (70%, 80% and 85% for the Grower, Finisher I and Finisher II phases, respectively). A total of 240 commercial hybrid pigs (equal numbers of barrows and gilts) were grown from 29.5 ± 0.29 to 114.5 ± 2.23 kg live weight in single-gender pens (barrows or gilts) of five pigs (eight pens per dietary treatment) with ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the study. At the end of each dietary phase and of the test period, ultrasound measurements were taken at the 10th rib. Animals from the transgenic (MON 71800) and non-transgenic (MON 71900) treatments were harvested at the end of the study and carcass and meat quality measurements were taken. Pigs fed the six wheat varieties had similar (P > 0.05) feed intake, live weight gain, gain : feed ratio and ultrasound measures of backfat thickness and longissimus muscle area. There was a wheat variety × gender interaction (P < 0.05) for longissimus fat content. Gilts fed the transgenic wheat had higher (P < 0.05) longissimus fat content than those fed the non-transgenic control wheat; however, for barrows there was no effect (P > 0.05) of wheat variety on longissimus fat content. However, there was no effect (P > 0.05) of wheat variety on other longissimus muscle quality or composition measures. Gilts had lower (P < 0.01) feed intake, growth rate and backfat thickness, and similar gain : feed ratio (P > 0.05) compared to barrows. This study, with growing–finishing swine, suggests that the Roundup Ready wheat (MON 71800) resulted in equivalent animal performance to conventional wheat.

Keywords

carcassgrowthpigstransgenic wheat
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 11 , November 2008 , pp. 1602 - 1609
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1995. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Cromwell, GL, Cline, TR, Crenshaw, JD, Crenshaw, TD, Ewan, RC, Hamilton, CR, Lewis, AJ, Mahan, DC, Miller, ER, Pettigrew, JE, Tribble, LF, Veum, TL 1993. The dietary protein and (or) lysine requirement of barrows and gilts. Journal of Animal Science 71, 1510–1519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cromwell, GL, Lindemann, MD, Randolph, JH, Parker, GR, Coffey, RD, Laurent, KM, Armstrong, CL, Mikel, WB, Stanisiewski, EP, Hartnell, GF 2002. Soybean meal from Roundup Ready or conventional soybeans in diets for growing-finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 80, 708–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaines, AM, Allee, GL, Ratliff, BW 2001. Swine digestible energy evaluations of Bt (MON 810) and Roundup Ready corn compared with commercial varieties. Journal of Animal Science 79 (suppl. 1), 109.Google Scholar
Hahn, J, Baker, DH 1995. Optimum ratio to lysine of threonine, tryptophan and sulfur amino acids for finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 73, 482–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, J, Biehl, RR, Baker, DH 1995. Ideal digestible lysine level for early- and late-finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 73, 773–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, BG, Vicini, JL, Hartnell, GF, Naylor, MW, Knight, CD, Robinson, EH, Fuchs, RL, Padgette, SR 1996. The feeding value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish, and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance. Journal of Nutrition 126, 717–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyun, Y, Ellis, M 2001. Effect of group size and feeder type on growth performance and feeding patterns in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79, 803–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyun, Y, Bressner, GE, Ellis, M, Lewis, AJ, Fischer, R, Stanisiewski, EP, Hartnell, GF 2004. Performance of growing-finishing pigs fed diets containing Roundup Ready® corn (event nk603), a non-transgenic genetically similar corn, or conventional corn lines. Journal of Animal Science 82, 571–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labroue, F, Gueblez, R, Sellier, P, Meunier-Salaun, MC 1994. Feeding behavior of group-housed Large White and Landrace pigs in French Central Test Stations. Livestock Production Science 40, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Pork Producers Council 1991. Procedures to evaluate market hogs. National Pork Producers Council, Des Moines, IA.Google Scholar
National Pork Producers Council 2000. Pork composition and quality assessment procedures. National Pork Producers Council, Des Moines, IA.Google Scholar
National Research Council 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Novakofski, J, Park, S, Bechtel, PJ, McKeith, FK 1989. Composition of cooked pork chops: effect of removing subcutaneous fat before cooking. Journal Food Science 54, 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidhu, RS, Hammond, BG, Fuchs, RL, Mutz, JN, Holden, LR, George, B, Olson, T 2000. Glyphosate-tolerant corn: the composition and feeding value of grain from glyphosate tolerant corn is equivalent to that of conventional corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 48, 2305–2312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanisiewski, EP, Hartnell, GF, Cook, DR 2001. Comparison of swine performance when fed diets containing Roundup Ready corn (GA21), parental line or conventional corn. Journal of Animal Science 79, 319.Google Scholar
Taylor, ML, Hartnell, GF, Riordan, SG, Nemeth, MA, Karunanandaa, K, George, B, Astwood, JD 2003a. Comparison of broiler performance when fed diets containing grain from Roundup Ready (NK 603), YieldGard × Roundup Ready (MON 810 × NK 603), non-transgenic control, or commercial corn. Poultry Science 82, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, ML, Hartnell, GF, Riordan, SG, Nemeth, MA, Karunanandaa, K, George, B, Astwood, JD 2003b. Comparison of broiler performance when fed diets containing grain from YieldGard (MON 810), YieldGard × Roundup Ready (GA21), non-transgenic control, or commercial corn. Poultry Science 82, 823–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed