Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:48:49.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional value of white lupins (Lupinus albus) for broilers: apparent metabolisable energy, apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and production performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2011

C. L. Nalle ,
V. Ravindran  and
G. Ravindran
C. L. Nalle*
Affiliation:
Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
V. Ravindran*
Affiliation:
Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
G. Ravindran
Affiliation:
Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the nutritional value of three cultivars (Promore, Kiev mutant and Ultra) of white lupins (Lupinus albus L.) for broilers. In experiment 1, the apparent metabolisable energy (AME) and ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients of the three cultivars were determined. The cultivar effects were significant (P < 0.05) for AME, but the ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients were similar (P > 0.05) between cultivars. The AME value of Ultra cultivar was lower (P < 0.05) than those of Promore and Kiev mutant cultivars. In Experiment 2, using the AME and ileal digestible amino acid values determined in Experiment 1, diets containing 200 g/kg of lupin were formulated and the effects of feeding these diets on performance, digestive tract development and excreta quality of broiler starters were investigated. Weight gain, feed intake and feed per gain of broilers fed diets containing white lupins were similar (P > 0.05) to those fed the maize–soybean meal diet. The performance of birds fed diets containing different cultivars of white lupins was similar (P > 0.05). Several digestive tract parameters were influenced by the dietary inclusion of white lupins. In particular, the relative liver weight and the relative empty weights of small intestine and caeca in birds fed diets containing white lupins were higher (P < 0.05) than those fed the maize–soybean meal diet. No differences (P > 0.05) were observed in the excreta quality scores between the birds fed the maize–soybean meal diet and those fed diets containing white lupins.

Keywords

white lupinsapparent metabolisable energyamino acidsileal digestibilitybroilers
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , April 2012 , pp. 579 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2005. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Brenes, A, Marquardt, RR, Guenter, W, Rotter, BA 1993. Effect of enzyme supplementation on the nutritional value of raw, autoclaved and dehulled lupins (Lupinus albus) in chicken diets. Poultry Science 72, 2281–2293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenes, A, Marquart, RR, Guenter, W, Viveros, A 2002. Effect of enzyme addition on the performance and gastrointestinal tract size of chicks fed lupin seed and their fractions. Poultry Science 81, 670–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowling, WA, Huygbe, C, Swiecicki, W 1998. Lupin breeding. In Lupins as crop plants: biology, production and utilization (ed. JS Gladstones, CA Atkins and J Hamblin), pp. 93–120. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Edwards, AC, van Barneveld, RJ 1998. Lupins for livestock and fish. In Lupins as crop plants: biology, production and utilization (ed. JS Gladstones, CA Atkins and J Hamblin), pp. 385–410. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Gabriel, I, Lessire, M, Mallet, S, Guillot, JF 2006. Microflora of the digestive tract: critical factors and consequences for poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal 62, 499–511.Google Scholar
Gatel, F 1994. Protein quality of legume seeds for non ruminant animals: a literature review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 45, 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladstones, JS 1998. Distribution, origin, taxonomy, history and importance. In Lupins as crop plants: biology, production and utilization (ed. JS Gladstones, CA Atkins and J Hamblin), pp. 1–40. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, AG, Oram, RN 1983. Variability for protein and oil quality in Lupinus albus. Animal Feed Science and Technology 9, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, RJ, van Barneveld, RJ, Choct, M 1998. Factors influencing the nutritive value of lupins for broiler chickens. Chicken Meat Research Development Committee Final Report, Project no. DAS 10CM, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Jezierny, D, Mosenthin, R, Bauer, E 2010. The use of grain legumes as a protein source in pig nutrition: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 157, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, H, Zhao, XQ, Knudsen, KE, Eggum, BO 1996. The influence of dietary fibre source and level on the development of the gastrointestinal tract digestibility and energy metabolism in broiler chickens. British Journal of Nutrition 75, 379–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karunajeewa, H, Bartlett, BE 1985. The effects of replacing soybean meal in broiler starter diets with white lupin seed meal of high manganese content. Nutrition Reports International 31, 53–58.Google Scholar
Kocher, A, Choct, M, Hughes, RJ, Bros, J 2000. Effect of food enzymes on utilization of lupin carbohydrates by broilers. British Poultry Science 41, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemme, A, Ravindran, V, Bryden, WL 2004. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in feed ingredients for broilers. World's Poultry Science Journal 60, 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalle, CL, Ravindran, G, Ravindran, V 2010a. Nutritional value of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) for broilers: apparent metabolisable energy, ileal amino acid digestibility and production performance. Animal Feed Science and Technology 156, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalle, CL, Ravindran, G, Ravindran, V 2010b. Influence of dehulling on the apparent metabolisable energy and ileal amino acid digestibility of grain legumes for broilers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90, 1227–1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nalle, CL, Ravindran, G, Ravindran, V 2011. Nutritional value of peas (Pisum sativum L.) for broilers: apparent metabolisable energy, apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and production performance. Animal Production Science 51, 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olkowski, AA, Olkowski, BI, Amarowicz, R, Classen, HL 2001. Adverse effects of dietary lupine in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 80, 621–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olver, MD, Jonker, A 1997. Effect of sweet, bitter and soaked micronised bitter lupins on broiler performance. British Poultry Science 38, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petterson, DS, Sipsas, S, Mackintosh, JB 1997. The chemical composition and nutritive value of Australian pulses, 2nd edition. Grains Research & Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia, 64pp.Google Scholar
Ravindran, V, Blair, R 1992. Feed resources for poultry production in Asia and the Pacific. II. Plant protein sources. World's Poultry Science Journal 48, 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V, Bryden, WL 1999. Amino acid availability in poultry – in vitro and in vivo measurements. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V, Hew, LI, Ravindran, G, Bryden, WL 2005. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in dietary ingredients for broiler chickens. Animal Science 81, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V, Morel, PCH, Rutherfurd, SM, Thomas, DV 2009. Endogenous flow of amino acids in the avian ileum is increased by increasing dietary peptide concentrations. British Journal of Nutrition 101, 822–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS 1997. SAS/STAT® user's guide: statistics, version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Short, FJ, Gorton, P, Wiseman, J, Boorman, KN 1996. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Animal Feed Science and Technology 59, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, CHM, Annison, G 1996. Non-starch polysaccharides in broiler nutrition – towards a physiologically valid approach to their determination. World's Poultry Science Journal 52, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdebouze, P, Bergeron, E, Gaborit, T, Delort-Laval, J 1980. Content and distribution of trypsin inhibitors and haemagglutinins in some legume seeds. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 60, 695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveros, A, Centeno, C, Arija, I, Brenes, A 2007. Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary lupin (Lupinus albus var Multolupa) in chicken diets. Poultry Science 86, 2631–2638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, YB, Ravindran, V, Thomas, DG, Birtles, BJ, Hendriks, WH 2004. Influence of method of whole wheat inclusion and xylanase supplementation on the performance, apparent metabolisable energy, digestive tract measurements and gut morphology of broilers. British Poultry Science 45, 705–709.Google ScholarPubMed