Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:19:28.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional sub-fertility in the dairy cow: towards improved reproductive management through a better biological understanding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2010

N. C. Friggens ,
C. Disenhaus  and
H. V. Petit
N. C. Friggens*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Aarhus, Research Centre Foulum, 8830 Tjele, Denmark UMR INRA-AgroParisTech Model Syst Nutr Rum, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris, France
C. Disenhaus
Affiliation:
Agrocampus Ouest UMR 1080 65 Rue St Brieuc, F-35042 Rennes, France et INRA UMR 1080 35570, Saint-Gilles
H. V. Petit
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Sherbrooke, QC J1M 1Z3, Canada
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There has been a significant decline in the reproductive performance of dairy cattle in recent decades. Cows, take longer time to return to the oestrus after calving, have poorer conception rates, and show fewer signs of oestrus. Achieving good reproductive performance is an increasing challenge for the dairy producer. In this study we focus on understanding the overall biological phenomena associated with nutritional sub-fertility rather than the underlying multiplicity of physiological interactions (already described in a number of recent studies). These phenomena are important because they represent the natural adaptations of the animal for dealing with variations in the nutritional environment. They can also be used to monitor and modulate reproductive performance on-farm. There is an underlying trade-off between two aspects of reproduction: investment in the viability of the current calf and investment in future offspring. As the investment in, and viability of, the current calf is related to maternal milk production, we can expect that level of milk production per se has effects on subsequent reproductive performance (investment in future offspring). Lactating cows have a lower proportion of viable embryos, which are of poorer quality, than do non-lactating cows. The same applies to high- compared to medium-genetic merit cows. Another important biological property is the adaptive use of body reserves in support of reproduction. Orchestrated endocrine changes in pregnancy and lactation facilitate the deposition of body lipid during pregnancy and mobilisation in early lactation. When the cow fails to accumulate the reserves she needs to safeguard reproduction she delays committing to further reproductive investment. But how does the cow ‘know’ that she is failing in energy terms? We argue that the cow does this by ‘monitoring’ both the body fat mobilisation and body fatness. Excessive body fat mobilisation indicates that current conditions are worse than expected. Body fatness indicates the future ability of the cow to safeguard her reproductive investment is compromised. Both delay further reproductive commitment. The relationship between reproductive performance and; milk production as an index of maternal investment, body fatness as an index of ability to safeguard reproductive investment, and body fat mobilisation as an index of the current nutritional environment – are examined. Nutritional strategies that seek to modulate body mobilisation and the endocrine environment by use of glucogenic and lipogenic diets, and the use of in-line progesterone profiles to monitor reproductive status are then discussed in this biological context.

Keywords

reproduction, milk production, body reserves, energy balance, trade-off
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 7: XIth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology (ISRP), 6–9 September, 2009 Clermont-Ferrand (France) , July 2010 , pp. 1197 - 1213
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abayasekara, DRE, Wathes, DC 1999. Effects of altering dietary FA composition on prostaglandin synthesis and fertility. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids 61, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamczewski, JZ, Fargey, PJ, Laarveld, B, Gunn, A, Flood, PF 1998. The influence of fatness on the likelihood of early-winter pregnancy in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Theriogenology 50, 605–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Gupta, S, Sharma, RK 2005. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 3, 28–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Saleh, RA, Bedaiwy, MA 2003. Role of reactive oxygen species in the pathophysiology of human reproduction. Fertility and Sterility 79, 829–843.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D, Kasyelic, JP, Corbett, R, Pitney, PA, Petit, HV, Small, JA, Zalkovic, P 2006. Lower pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows fed a diet enriched in alpha-linolenic acid. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3066–3074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, JB, Ridder, C, Larsen, T 2008. Priming the cow for mobilization in the periparturient period: effects of supplementing the dry cows with saturated fat or linseed. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 1029–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayad, A, Sousa, NM, Sulon, J, Hornick, JL, Watts, J, Lopez-Gatius, F, Iguer-Ouada, M, Beckers, JF 2007. Influence of progesterone concentrations on secretory functions of trophoblast and pituitary during the first trimester of pregnancy in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 67, 1503–1511.Google Scholar
Bauman, DE 2000. Regulation of nutrient partitioning during lactation: homeostasis and homeorhesis revisitied. In Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth and reproduction (ed. PB Cronjé), pp. 311–328. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Beerda, B, Wyszynska-Koko, J, te Pas, MFW, de Wit, AAC, Veerkamp, RF 2008. Expression profiles of genes regulating dairy cow fertility: recent findings, on-going activities and future possibilities. Animal 2, 1158–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, DP, Buckley, F, Dillon, P, Evans, RD, Rath, M, Veerkamp, RF 2003. Genetic relationships among body condition score, body weight, milk yield, and fertility in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2193–2204.Google Scholar
Berry, DP, Roche, JR, Coffey, MP 2008. Body condition score and fertility – more than just a feeling. In Fertility in dairy cows: bridging the gaps (ed. MD Royal, NC Friggens and RF Smith), pp. 107–118. British Society of Animal Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Blackburn, DG 1993. Lactation: historical patterns and potential for manipulation. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 3195–3212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanc, F, Agabriel, J 2008. Modelling the reproductive efficiency in a beef cow herd: effect of calving date, bull exposure and body condition at calving on the calving-conception interval and calving distribution. Journal of Agricultural Science 146, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, F, Bocquier, F, Agabriel, J, D’Hour, P, Chilliard, Y 2006. Adaptive abilities of the females and sustainability of ruminant livestock systems. A review. Animal Research 55, 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, F, Martin, GB, Bocquier, F 2001. Modelling reproduction in farm animals: a review. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 13, 337–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blevins, CA, Shirley, JE, Stevenson, JS 2006. Milking frequency, estradiol cypionate, and somatotropin influence lactation and reproduction in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4176–4187.Google Scholar
Boichard, D, Manfredi, E 1994. Genetic-analysis of conception rate in French Holstein cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science 44, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronson, FH 1989. Mammalian reproductive biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Bronson, FH, Manning, JM 1991. The energetic regulation of ovulation: a realistic role for body fat. Biology of Reproduction 44, 945–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broster, WH, Broster, VJ 1998. Body score of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 65, 155–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulman, DC, Lamming, GE 1978. Milk progesterone levels in relation to conception, repeat breeding and factors influencing acyclicity in dairy cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, PD, Engle, TE, Harris, MA, Enss, RM, Whittier, JC 2003. Effect of fish meal supplementation on plasma and endometrial fatty acid composition in nonlactating beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2840–2846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, WR 2000. Nutritional interactions with reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 60, 449–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, WR 2003. Energy balance relationships with follicular development, ovulation and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 83, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, WR, Everett, RW, Coppock, CE 1981. The relationships between energy balance, milk production and ovulation in postpartum Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Science 53, 742–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, WR, Smith, RD 1989. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 767–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagas, LM, Bass, JJ, Blache, D, Burke, CR, Kay, JK, Lindsay, DR, Lucy, MC, Martin, GB, Meier, S, Rhodes, FM, Roche, JR, Thatcher, WW, Webb, R 2007. New perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4022–4032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagas, LM, Rhodes, FM, Blache, D, Gore, PJS, Macdonald, KA, Verkerk, GA 2006. Precalving effects on metabolic responses and postpartum anestrus in grazing primiparous dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1981–1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childs, S, Lynch, CO, Hennessy, AA, Stanton, C, Wathes, DC, Sreenan, JM, Diskin, MG, Kenny, DA 2008. Effect of dietary enrichment with either n-3 or n-6 fatty acids on systemic metabolite and hormone concentration and ovarian function in heifers. Animal 2, 883–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilliard, Y, Ferlay, A, Faulconnier, Y, Bonnet, M, Rouel, J, Bocquier, F 2000. Adipose tissue metabolism and its role in adaptations to undernutrition in ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 59, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, DA, Phyn, CVC, Tong, MJ, Collis, SJ, Dalley, DE 2006. A systems comparison of once- versus twice-daily milking of pastured dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1854–1862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyral-Castel, S, Ramé, C, Fabre-Nys, C, Monniaux, D, Monget, P, Dupont, F, Eggen, A, Fritz, S, Malafosse, A, Faverdin, P, Disenhaus, C, Le Mézec, P, Dupont, J 2009. Characterization of dairy cows carrying “fertil +/+” or “fertil −/−” haplotype for one QTL of female fertility located on the chromosome 3. In Digestion, metabolism, and effects of nutrition on reproduction and welfare Proceedings XIth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology. Clermont-Ferrand (France) 6–9 September 2009, pp. 710–711. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Cutullic, E, Delaby, L, Causeur, D, Michel, G, Disenhaus, C 2009a. Hierarchy of factors affecting behavioural signs used for oestrus detection of Holstein and Normande dairy cows in a seasonal calving system. Animal Reproduction Science 113, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutullic, E, Delaby, L, Michel, G, Disenhaus, C 2009b. Consequence on reproduction of two feeding levels with opposite effects on milk yield and body condition loss in Holstein and Normande cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92 (E-suppl. 1), 355.Google Scholar
Darwash, AO, Lamming, GE, Woolliams, JA 1997. The phenotypic association between the interval to post-partum ovulation and traditional measures of fertility in dairy cattle. Animal Science 65, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechow, CD, Rogers, GW, Clay, JS 2002. Heritability and correlations among body condition score loss, body condition score, production and reproductive performance. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 3062–3070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delaby, L, Faverdin, P, Michel, G, Disenhaus, C, Peyraud, JL 2009. Effect of different feeding strategies on lactation performance of Holstein and Normande dairy cows. Animal 3, 891–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dieleman, SJ, Bevers, MM, Van Tol, HTM, Willemse, AH 1986. Peripheral plasma concentrations of oestradiol, progesterone, cortisol, LH and prolactin during the oestrous cycle in the cow, with emphasis on the peri-oestrous period. Animal Reproduction Science 10, 275–292.Google Scholar
Disenhaus, C, Cutullic, E, Blanc, F, Agabriel, J 2009. Breed comparison of post partum ovarian activity in cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92 (E-suppl. 1), 498.Google Scholar
Disenhaus, C, Kerbrat, S, Philipot, JM 2002. First 3 weeks milk yield is negatively related with postpartum ovarian cycles normality in dairy cows. In 9e Rencontres de Recherches Ruminants, Paris, France, pp. 147–150.Google Scholar
Diskin, MG, Mackey, DR, Roche, JF, Sreenan, JM 2003. Effects of nutrition and metabolic status on circulating hormones and ovarian follicle development in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 78, 345–370.Google Scholar
Diskin, MG, Murphy, JJ, Sreenan, JM 2006. Embryo survival in dairy cows managed under pastoral conditions. Animal Reproduction Science 96, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, H, Walker, SL, Morris, MJ, Routly, JE, Smith, RF 2008. Why is it getting more difficult to successfully artificially inseminate dairy cows? Animal 2, 1104–1111.Google Scholar
Drackley, JK 1999. Biology of dairy cows during the transition period: the final frontier? Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2259–2273.Google Scholar
Dransfield, MBG, Nebel, RL, Pearson, RE, Warnick, LD 1998. Timing of insemination for dairy cows identified in estrus by a radiotelemetric estrus detection system. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1874–1882.Google Scholar
Druet, TS, Fritz, S, Boussaha, M, Ben-Jemaa, S, Guillaume, F, Derbala, D, Zelnika, D, Lechner, D, Charon, C, Boichard, D, Gut, IG, Eggen, A, Gautier, M 2008. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting female fertility in dairy cattle on BTA03 using a dense single-nucleotide polymorphism map. Genetics 178, 2227–2235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etherton, TD, Bauman, DE 1998. Biology of somatotropin in growth and lactation of domestic animals. Physiological Reviews 78, 745–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faverdin, P, M’hamed, D, Verite, R 2003. Effects of metabolizable protein on intake and milk production of dairy cows independent of effects on ruminal digestion. Animal Science 76, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, FA, Britt, JH, McDaniel, BT, Wilk, JC, Rakes, AH 1983. Reproductive traits of Holsteins and Jerseys. Effects of age, milk yield, and clinical abnormalities on involution of cervix and uterus, ovulation, estrous cycles, detection of estrus, conception rate, and days open. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 1128–1147.Google Scholar
Fouladi-Nashta, AA, Gutierrez, CG, Garnsworthy, PC, Webb, R 2005. Effects of dietary carbohydrate source on oocyte/embryo quality and development in high-yielding, lactating dairy cattle. Biology of Reproduction, Special issue (2005), 135–136.Google Scholar
Fouladi-Nashta, AA, Gutierrez, CG, Gong, JG, Garnsworthy, PC, Webb, R 2007. Impact of dietary fatty acids on oocyte quality and development in lactating dairy cows. Biology of Reproduction 77, 9–17.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC 2003. Body lipid reserves and the reproductive cycle: towards a better understanding. Livestock Production Science 83, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friggens, NC, Andersen, JB, Larsen, T, Aaes, O, Dewhurst, RJ 2004a. Priming the dairy cow for lactation: a review of dry cow feeding strategies. Animal Research 53, 453–473.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Berg, P, Theilgaard, P, Korsgaard, IR, Ingvartsen, KL, Løvendahl, PL, Jensen, J 2007. Breed and parity effects on energy balance profiles through lactation: evidence for genetically driven body reserve change. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 5291–5305.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Bjerring, M, Ridder, C, Højsgaard, S, Larsen, T 2008. Improved detection of reproductive status in dairy cows using milk progesterone profiles. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 43, 113–121.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Chagunda, MGG 2005. Prediction of the reproductive status of cattle on the basis of milk progesterone measures: model description. Theriogenology 64, 155–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friggens, NC, Emmans, GC, Kyriazakis, I, Oldham, JD, Lewis, M 1998. Feed intake relative to stage of lactation for dairy cows consuming total mixed diets with a high or low ration of concentrate to forage. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2228–2239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friggens, NC, Ingvartsen, KL, Emmans, GC 2004b. Prediction of body lipid change in pregnancy and lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 988–1000.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Løvendahl, P 2008. The potential of on-farm fertility profiles: In-line progesterone and activity measurements. In Fertility in dairy cows: bridging the gaps (ed. MD Royal, NC Friggens and RF Smith), pp. 72–78. British Society of Animal Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Frisch, RE, Hegsted, DM, Yoshinaga, K 1977. Carcass components at first estrus of rats on high-fat and low-fat diets: body water, protein, and fat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 74, 379–383.Google Scholar
Garbarino, EJ, Hernandez, JA, Shearer, JK, Risco, CA, Thatcher, WW 2004. Effect of lameness on ovarian activity in postpartum Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 4123–4131.Google Scholar
Garcia-Ispierto, I, Lopez-Gatius, F, Santolaria, P, Yaniz, JL, Nogareda, C, Lopez-Bejar, M 2007. Factors affecting the fertility of high producing dairy herds in northeastern Spain. Theriogenology 67, 632–638.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, PC, Fouladi-Nashta, AA, Mann, GE, Sinclair, KD, Webb, R 2009. Effect of diet induced changes in plasma insulin concentrations during the early post partum period on pregnancy rate in dairy cows. Reproduction 137, 759–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnsworthy, PC, Lock, A, Mann, GE, Sinclair, KD, Webb, R 2008a. Nutrition, metabolism, and fertility in dairy cows: 1. dietary energy source and ovarian function. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3814–3823.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, PC, Lock, A, Mann, GE, Sinclair, KD, Webb, R 2008b. Nutrition, metabolism, and fertility in dairy cows: 2. dietary fatty acids and ovarian function. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3824–3833.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, PC, Sinclair, KD, Webb, R 2008c. Integration of physiological mechanisms that influence fertility in dairy cows. Animal 2, 1144–1152.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, PC, Topps, JH 1982. The effect of body condition of dairy cows at calving on their food intake and performance when given complete diets. Animal Production 35, 113–119.Google Scholar
Gong, JG, Lee, WJ, Garnsworthy, PC, Webb, R 2002. Effect of dietary-induced increases in circulating insulin concentrations during the early postpartum period on reproductive function in dairy cows. Reproduction 123, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimard, B, Disenhaus, C 2005. Les anomalies de reprise de la cyclicité après vêlage. Le Point Vétérinaire, 16-21.Grimard B, Disenhaus C, 2005. Anomalies de la reprise de cyclicité après vêlage chez la vache laitière, fréquence, facteurs de risque, diagnostic et traitement. Le Point Vétérinaire, Numéro spécial Reproduction des ruminants : maîtrise des cycles et pathologie, 16–21.Google Scholar
Gumen, A, Rastani, RR, Grummer, RR, Wiltbank, MC 2005. Reduced dry periods and varying prepartum diets alter postpartum ovulation and reproductive measures. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2401–2411.Google Scholar
Gunn, RG, Doney, JM, Russel, AJF 1972. Embryo mortality in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by body condition at mating and post mating nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science 79, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, CG, Gong, JG, Bramley, TA, Webb, R 2006. Selection on predicted breeding value for milk production delays ovulation independently of changes in follicular development, milk production and body weight. Animal Reproduction Science 95, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayssen, V 1993. Empirical and theoretical constraints on the evolution of lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 3213–3233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herdt, TH 1988. Fatty liver in dairy cows. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 4, 269–287.Google Scholar
Hoggard, N, Hunter, L, Trayhurn, P, Williams, LM, Mercer, JG 1998. Leptin and reproduction. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 57, 421–427.Google Scholar
Horan, B, Mee, JF, O’Connor, P, Rath, M, Dillon, P 2005. The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on postpartum ovarian function, animal production and conception rate to first service. Theriogenology 63, 950–971.Google Scholar
Huang, JC 2008. The role of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptors in the development and physiology of gametes and preimplantation embryos. PPAR Research, Vol. 2008, Article ID 732303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingvartsen, KL, Boisclair, Y 2001. Leptin and the regulation of food intake, energy homeostasis and immunity with special focus on periparturient ruminants. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 21, 215–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingvartsen, KL, Friggens, NC, Faverdin, P 1999. Food intake regulation in late pregnancy and early lactation. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. JD Oldham, G Simm, AF Groen, BL Nielsen, JE Pryce and TLJ Lawrence), pp. 37–54. British Society of Animal Science Occasional Publication 24, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
Jemaa, S, Fritz, S, Guillaume, F, Druet, TS, Denis, C, Eggen, A, Gautier, M 2008. Detection of quantitative trait loci affecting non-return rate in French dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 125, 280–288.Google Scholar
Kerbrat, S, Disenhaus, C 2004. A proposition for an updated behavioural characterisation of the oestrus period in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87, 223–238.Google Scholar
Kiso, Y 2004. Antioxidative roles of sesamin, a functional lignan in sesame seed, ant its effect on lipid- and alcohol-metabolism in the liver: a DNA microarray study. Biofactors 21, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, CH 2001. Lactation and gestation in dairy cows: flexibility avoids nutritional extremes. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 60, 527–537.Google Scholar
Knight, CH 2008. Extended lactation in dairy cows: could it work for European dairy farmers?. In Fertility in dairy cows: bridging the gaps (ed. MD Royal, NC Friggens and RF Smith), pp. 138–145. British Society of Animal Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Koenen, EPC, Veerkamp, RF, Dobbelaar, P, De Jong, G 2001. Genetic analysis of body condition score of lactating Dutch Holstein and red-and-white heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1265–1270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalman, DL, Williams, JE, Hess, BW, Thomas, MG, Keisler, DH 2000. Effect of dietary energy on milk production and metabolic hormones in thin, primiparous beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 78, 530–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeBlanc, SJ, Duffield, TF, Leslie, KE, Bateman, KG, Keefe, GP, Walton, JS, Johnson, WH 2002. Defining and diagnosing postpartum clinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2223–2236.Google Scholar
Leroy, JLMR, Opsomer, G, Van Soom, A, Goovaerts, IGF, Bols, PEJ 2008a. Reduced fertility in high-yielding dairy cows: are the oocyte and embryo in danger? part I – The importance of negative energy balance and altered corpus luteum function to the reduction of oocyte and embryo quality in high-yielding dairy cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 43, 612–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, JLMR, Van Soom, A, Opsomer, G, Bols, REJ 2008b. The consequences of metabolic changes in high-yielding dairy cows on oocyte and embryo quality. Animal 2, 1120–1127.Google Scholar
Leroy, JLMR, Van Soom, A, Opsomer, G, Goovaerts, IGF, Bols, PEJ 2008c. Reduced fertility in high-yielding dairy cows: are the oocyte and embryo in danger? part II – mechanisms linking nutrition and reduced oocyte and embryo quality in high-yielding dairy cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 43, 623–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leroy, JLMR, Vanholder, T, Mateusen, B, Christophe, A, Opsomer, G, de Kruif, A, Genicot, G, Van Soom, A 2005. Non-esterified fatty acids in follicular fluid of dairy cows and their effect on developmental capacity of bovine oocytes in vitro. Reproduction 130, 485–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessard, M, Gagnon, N, Petit, HV 2003. Immune response of postpartum dairy cows fed flaxseed. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2647–2657.Google Scholar
Lim, H, Gupta, RA, Ma, WG, Paria, BC, Moller, DE, Morrow, JD, DuBois, RN, Trzaskos, JM, Dey, SK 1999. Cyclo-oxygenase-2-derived prostacyclin mediates embryo implantation in the mouse via PPARdelta. Genes and Development 13, 1561–1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, H, Caraviello, DZ, Satter, LD, Fricke, PM, Wiltbank, MC 2005. Relationship between level of milk production and multiple ovulations in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2783–2793.Google Scholar
Lopez, H, Satter, LD, Wiltbank, MC 2004. Relationship between level of milk production and estrous behavior of lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 81, 209–223.Google Scholar
Lopez-Gatius, F, Hunter, RHF, Garbayo, JM, Santolaria, P, Yaniz, J, Serrano, B, Ayad, A, de Sousa, NM, Beckers, JF 2007. Plasma concentrations of pregnancy-associated glycoprotein-1 (PAG-1) in high producing dairy cows suffering early fetal loss during the warm season. Theriogenology 67, 1324–1330.Google Scholar
Løvendahl, P, Friggens, NC 2008. Opportunities for on-line monitoring of health and performance in dairy cows. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition 2008 (ed. PC Garnsworthy and J Wiseman), pp. 15–38. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC 2003. Mechanisms linking nutrition and reproduction in postpartum cows. Reproduction Supplement (Cambridge UK) 61, 415–427.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC 2007. Fertility in high-producing dairy cows: reasons for decline and corrective strategies for sustainable improvement. Reproduction Supplement (Cambridge UK) 64, 237–254.Google ScholarPubMed
Lucy, MC, Savio, JD, Badinga, L, De la Sota, RL, Thatcher, WW 1992. Factors that affect ovarian follicular dynamics in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3615–3626.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC, Verkerk, GA, Whyte, BE, Macdonald, KA, Burton, L, Cursons, RT, Roche, JR, Holmes, CW 2009. Somatotropic axis components and nutrient partitioning in genetically diverse dairy cows managed under different feed allowances in a pasture system. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 526–539.Google Scholar
Macdonald, KA, Verkerk, GA, Thorrold, BS, Pryce, JE, Penno, JW, McNaughton, LR, Burton, LJ, Lancaster, JAS, Williamson, JH, Holmes, CW 2008. a comparison of three strains of Holstein-Friesian grazed on pasture and managed under different feed allowances. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 1693–1707.Google Scholar
Manning, JM, Bronson, FH 1990. The effects of low temperature and food intake on ovulation in domestic mice. Physiological Zoology. 63, 938–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megahed, GA, Anwar, MM, Wasfy, SI, Hammadeh, ME 2008. Influence of heat stress on the cortisol and oxidant-antioxidants balance during oestrous phase in buffalo-cows (Bubalus bubalis): thermo-protective role of antioxidant treatment. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 43, 672–677.Google Scholar
Meikle, A, Kulcsar, M, Chilliard, Y, Febel, H, Delavaud, C, Cavestany, D, Chilibroste, P 2004. Effects of parity and body condition at parturition on endocrine and reproductive parameters of the cow. Reproduction 127, 727–737.Google Scholar
Metz, SHM, van den Bergh, SG 1977. Regulation of fat mobilization in adipose tissue of dairy cows in the period around parturition. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 25, 198–211.Google Scholar
Moreira, F, Risco, CA, Pires, MFA, Ambrose, JD, Drost, M, DeLorenzo, M, Thatcher, WW 2000. Effect of body condition on reproductive efficiency of lactating dairy cows receiving a timed insemination. Theriogenology 53, 1305–1319.Google Scholar
Nebel, RL, McGilliard, ML 1993. Interactions of high milk yield and reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 3257–3268.Google Scholar
Opsomer, G, Coryn, M, Deluyker, H, De Kruif, A 1998. An analysis of ovarian dysfunction in high yielding dairy cows after calving based on progesterone profiles. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 33, 193–204.Google Scholar
Opsomer, G, Grohn, YT, Hertl, J, Coryn, M, Deluyker, H, de Kruif, A 2000. Risk factors for post partum ovarian dysfunction in high producing dairy cows in Belgium: a field study. Theriogenology 53, 841–857.Google Scholar
Østergaard, S, Friggens, NC, Chagunda, MGG 2005. Technical and economic effects of an online progesterone indicator in a dairy herd estimated by stochastic simulation. Theriogenology 64, 819–843.Google Scholar
Palin, MF, Brochu-Gaudreau, K, Beaudry, D, Small, J, Petit, HV 2005. Effects of feeding flaxseed on cyclooxygenase 2 (Cox-2) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) delta and gamma mRNA levels at the time of maternal recognition of pregnancy in Holstein cows. Biology of Reproduction, Special Issue (2005), p. 142 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Pasqualotto, EB, Agarwal, A, Sharma, RK, Izzo, VM, Pinotti, JA, Joshi, NJ, Rose, BI 2004. Effect of oxidative stress in follicular fluid on the outcome of assisted reproductive procedures. Fertility and Sterility 81, 973–976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patton, J, Kenny, DA, Mee, JF, O’Mara, FP, Wathes, DC, Cook, M, Murphy, JJ 2006. Effect of milking frequency and diet on milk production, energy balance, and reproduction in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1478–1487.Google Scholar
Pedernera, M, Garcia, SC, Horagadoga, A, Barchia, I, Fulkerson, WJ 2008. Energy balance and reproduction on dairy cows fed to achieve low or high milk production on a pasture-based system. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3896–3907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersson, KJ, Berglund, B, Strandberg, E, Gustafsson, H, Flint, APF, Woolliams, JA, Royal, MD 2007. Genetic analysis of postpartum measures of luteal activity in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 427–434.Google Scholar
Petersson, KJ, Gustafsson, H, Strandberg, E, Berglund, B 2006. Atypical progesterone profiles and fertility in swedish dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2529–2538.Google Scholar
Petit, HV, Côrtes, C, Gagnon, N, Palin, MF, Tao, S, Benchaar, C, Lacasse, P 2009. Flax hulls and oil supplementation on the activity of antioxidant enzymes in dairy cows. In Digestion, metabolism, and effects of nutrition on reproduction and welfare. Proceedings XIth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology. Clermont-Ferrand (France) 6–9 September 2009, pp. 630–631. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Petit, HV, Dewhurst, RJ, Scollan, ND, Proulx, JG, Khalid, H, Haresign, W, Twagiramungu, H, Mann, GE 2002. Milk production and composition, ovarian function, and prostaglandin secretion of dairy cows fed omega-3 fats. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 889–899.Google Scholar
Petit, HV, Twagiramungu, H 2006. Conception rate and reproductive function of dairy cows fed different fat sources. Theriogenology 66, 1316–1324.Google Scholar
Pike, IH, Barlow, SM 2000. The fats of life: the role of fish. Lipid Technology 12, 58–60.Google Scholar
Pollott, GE, Coffey, MP 2008. The effect of genetic merit and production system on dairy cow fertility, measured using progesterone profiles and on-farm recording. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3649–3660.Google Scholar
Pond, CM 1977. The significance of lactation in the evolution of mammals. Evolution 31, 177–199.Google Scholar
Ponsart, C, Leger, T, Dubois, P, Charbonnier, G, Freret, S, Humblot, P 2006. Identification of body condition profiles in primiparous and multiparous Holstein cows and relationships with time interval between calving and first insemination. In 13e Rencontres Recherches Ruminants, Paris, France, 288pp.Google Scholar
Prasad, K 2000. Antioxidant activity of secoisolariciresinol diglucoside-derived metabolites, secoisolariciresinol, enterodiol, and enterolactone. International Journal of Angiology. 9, 220–225.Google Scholar
Pryce, JE, Coffey, MP, Brotherstone, S 2000. The genetic relationship between calving interval, body condition score and linear type and management traits in registered Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2664–2671.Google Scholar
Pryce, JE, Coffey, MP, Brotherstone, S, Woolliams, JA 2002. Genetic relationships between calving interval and body condition score conditional on milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1590–1595.Google Scholar
Pryce, JE, Harris, BL 2006. Genetics of body condition score in New Zealand dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4424–4432.Google Scholar
Pryce, JE, Nielsen, BL, Veerkamp, RF, Simm, G 1999. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 57, 193–201.Google Scholar
Rajesha, J, Kotamballi, N, Murthy, C, Kumar, MK, Madhusudhan, B, Ravishankar, GA 2006. Antioxidant potentials of flaxseed by in vivo model. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54, 3794–3799.Google Scholar
Rémond, B, Pomiès, D 2005. Once daily milking of dairy cows: a review of recent French experiments. Animal Research 54, 427–442.Google Scholar
Rhodes, FM, McDougall, S, Burke, CR, Verkerk, GA, Macmillan, KL 2003. Treatment of cows with an extended postpartum anestrous interval. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1876–1894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ringbom, T, Huss, U, Stenholm, Å, Flock, S, Skattebøl, A, Perera, P, Bohlin, L 2001. Cox-2 inhibitory effects of naturally occurring and modified fatty acids. Journal of Natural Products 64, 745–749.Google Scholar
Robinson, RS, Pushpakumara, PG, Peters, AR, Abayasekara, DRE, Wathes, DC 2002. Effects of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids on ovarian and uterine function in lactating dairy cows. Reproduction 124, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roche, JR, Berry, DP, Kolver, ES 2006. Holstein-Friesian strain and feed effects on milk production, body weight, and body condition score profiles in grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3532–3543.Google Scholar
Roche, JR, Berry, DP, Lee, JM, Macdonald, KA, Boston, RC 2007. Describing the body condition score change between successive calvings: a novel strategy generalizable to diverse cohorts. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4378–4396.Google Scholar
Roche, JR, Friggens, NC, Kay, JK, Fisher, MW, Stafford, KJ, Berry, DP 2009. Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5769–5801.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Martinez, H, Hultgren, J, Båge, R, Bergqvist, A-S, Svensson, C, Bergsten, C, Lidfors, L, Gunnarsson, S, Algers, B, Emanuelson, U, Berglund, B, Andersson, G, Håård, M, Lindhé, B, Stålhammar, H, Gustafsson, H 2008. Reproductive performance in high-producing dairy cows: can we sustain it under current practice?. In IVIS Reviews in Veterinary Medicine (www.ivis.org), Article ID R0108.1208. IVIS, Ithaca, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Royal, MD, Darwash, AO, Flint, APF, Webb, R, Woolliams, JA, Lamming, GE 2000. Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Animal Science 70, 487–501.Google Scholar
Royal, MD, Pryce, JE, Woolliams, JA, Flint, APF 2002. The genetic relationship between commencement of luteal activity and calving interval, body condition score, production, and linear type traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 3071–3080.Google Scholar
Rukkwamsuk, T, Geelen, MJH, Kruip, TAM, Wensing, T 2000. Interrelation of fatty acid composition in adipose tissue, serum, and liver of dairy cows during the development of fatty liver postpartum. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 52–59.Google Scholar
Santos, JEP, Thatcher, WW, Chebel, RC, Cerri, RLA, Galvao, KN 2004. The effect of embryonic death rates in cattle on the efficacy of estrus synchronization programs. Animal Reproduction Science 82, 513–535.Google Scholar
Schneider, JE, Wade, GN 2000. Inhibition of reproduction in service of energy balance. In Reproduction in context: social and environmental influences on reproductive physiology and behaviour (ed. K Wallen and JE Schneider), pp. 35–82. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Snijders, SE, Dillon, P, O’Callaghan, D, Boland, MP 2000. Effect of genetic merit, milk yield, body condition and lactation number on in vitro oocyte development in dairy cows. Theriogenology 53, 981–989.Google Scholar
Sørensen, AC, Lawlor, T, Ruiz, R 2008. A survey on fertility in the Holstein populations of the world. In Fertility in dairy cows: bridging the gaps (ed. MD Royal, NC Friggens and RF Smith), pp. 63–64. British Society of Animal Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Spicer, LJ 2001. Leptin: a possible metabolic signal affecting reproduction. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 21, 251–270.Google Scholar
Sreenan, JM, Diskin, MG, Morris, DG 2001. Embryo survival rate in cattle: a major limitation to the achievement of high fertility. In Fertility in the high producing dairy cow (ed. MG Diskin), pp. 93–105. British Society of Animal Science (Occasional Publication), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
Staples, CR, Burke, JM, Thatcher, WW 1998. Influence of supplemental fats on reproductive tissues and performance of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 856–871.Google Scholar
Staples, CR, Thatcher, WW, Clark, JH 1990. Relationship between ovarian activity and energy status during the early postpartum period of high producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 938–947.Google Scholar
Strang, BD, Bertics, SJ, Grummer, RR, Armentano, LE 1998. Effect of long-chain fatty acids on triglyceride accumulation, gluconeogenesis and ureagenesis in bovine hepatocytes. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 728–739.Google Scholar
Thatcher, WW, Bilby, TR, Bartolome, JA, Silvestre, FT, Staples, CR, Santos, JEP 2006. Strategies for improving fertility in the modern dairy cow. Theriogenology 65, 30–44.Google Scholar
Thatcher, WW, Binelli, M, Burke, JM, Staples, CR, Ambrose, JD, Coelho, S 1997. Antiluteolytic signals between conceptus and endometrium. Theriogenology 47, 131–140.Google Scholar
Theilgaard, P, Friggens, NC, Sloth, KH, Ingvartsen, KL 2002. The effect of breed, parity and body fatness on the lipolytic response of dairy cows. Animal Science 75, 209–219.Google Scholar
Trivers, RL 1974. Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist 14, 249–264.Google Scholar
van Knegsel, ATM, van den Branda, H, Dijkstra, J, Tamminga, S, Kemp, B 2005. Effect of dietary energy source on energy balance, production, metabolic disorders and reproduction in lactating dairy cattle. Reproduction Nutrition Development 45, 665–688.Google Scholar
van Knegsel, ATM, van den Brand, H, Dijkstra, J, Van Straalen, WM, Heetkamp, MJW, Tamminga, S, Kemp, B 2007a. Dietary energy source in dairy cows in early lactation: energy partitioning and milk composition. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1467–1476.Google Scholar
van Knegsel, ATM, van den Brand, H, Dijkstra, J, Van Straalen, WM, Jorritsma, R, Tamminga, S, Kemp, B 2007b. Effect of glucogenic vs. lipogenic diets on energy balance, blood metabolites, and reproduction in primiparous and multiparous dairy cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3397–3409.Google Scholar
van Knegsel, ATM, van den Brand, H, Graat, EAM, Dijkstra, J, Jorritsma, R, Decuypere, E, Tamminga, S, Kemp, B 2007c. Dietary energy source in dairy cows in early lactation: metabolites and metabolic hormones. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1477–1485.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, RF, Beerda, B, van der Lende, T 2003. Effects of genetic selection for milk yield on energy balance, levels of hormones, and metabolites in lactating cattle, and possible links to reduced fertility. Livestock Production Science 83, 257–275.Google Scholar
Vernon, RG, Denis, RGP, Sørensen, A 2001. Signals of adiposity. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 21, 197–214.Google Scholar
Villa-Godoy, A, Hughes, TL, Emery, RS, Enright, WJ, Ealy, AD, Zinn, SA, Fogwell, RL 1990. Energy balance and body condition influence luteal function in Holstein heifers. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 7, 135–148.Google Scholar
Wade, GN, Schneider, JE, Li, H-Y 1996. Control of fertility by metabolic cues. American Journal of Physiology Endocrinology and Metabolism 270, E1–E19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldmann, A 1993. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for milk progesterone using a monoclonal antibody. Animal Reproduction Science 34, 19–30.Google Scholar
Walsh, RB, Walton, JS, Kelton, DF, LeBlanc, SJ, Leslie, KE, Duffield, TF 2007. The effect of subclinical ketosis in early lactation on reproductive performance of postpartum dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 2788–2796.Google Scholar
Walsh, S, Buckley, F, Pierce, K, Byrne, N, Patton, J, Dillon, P 2008. Effects of breed and feeding system on milk production, body weight, body condition score, reproductive performance, and postpartum ovarian function. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4401–4413.Google Scholar
Webb, R, Garnsworthy, PC, Campbell, BK, Hunter, MG 2007. Intra-ovarian regulation of follicular development and oocyte comptence in farm animals. Theriogenology 68, S22–S29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltbank, MC, Lopez, H, Sartori, R, Sangsritavong, S, Gumen, A 2006. Changes in reproductive physiology of lactating dairy cows due to elevated steroid metabolism. Theriogenology 65, 17–29.Google Scholar
Windig, JJ, Beerda, B, Veerkamp, RF 2008. Relationship between milk progesterone profiles and genetic merit for milk production, milking frequency, and feeding regimen in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2874–2884.Google Scholar
Woodroffe, R 1995. Body condition affects implantation date in the European badger, Meles meles. Journal of Zoology (London) 236, 183–188.Google Scholar
Wright, IA, Rhind, SM, Whyte, TK, Smith, AJ 1992. Effects of body condition at calving and feeding level after calving on LH profiles and the duration of the post-partum anoestrus period in beef cows. Animal Production 55, 41–46.Google Scholar
Wright, IA, Rhind, SM, Whyte, TK, Smith, AJ, McMillen, SR, Prado, R 1990. Circulating concentrations of LH and FSH and pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in intact and ovariectomized suckled beef cows in two levels of body condition. Animal Production 51, 93–101.Google Scholar
Yan, T, Mayne, CS, Keady, TWJ, Agnew, RE 2006. Effects of dairy cow genotype with two planes of nutriton on energy partitioning between milk and body tissue. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1031–1042.Google Scholar
Yaniz, JL, Santolaria, P, Giribet, A, Lopez-Gatius, F 2006. Factors affecting walking activity at estrus during postpartum period and subsequent fertility in dairy cows. Theriogenology 66, 1943–1950.Google Scholar